12°c Overcast
11°c Cloudy with clear breaks
Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
Too much secrecy around mileage claims
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency won’t tell the public specifics about the problems involving auto mileage estimates from the two automakers. (TYLER BROWNBRIDGE / POSTMEDIA NEWS ARCHIVES)
The mileage claims made by automakers play a key role in a multibillion-dollar industry that deserves close government scrutiny. But what happens when the regulators fall down on the job?
The federal Environmental Protection Agency has failed consumers with its abysmal handling of a controversy involving the fuel efficiency of some recent Hyundai and Kia vehicles.
As detailed in The Kansas City Star on Sunday, the EPA won’t tell the public specifics about the problems involving auto mileage estimates from the two automakers.
The EPA also won’t comment when asked about how well the annual fuel economy standard tests are overseen by the government these days.
Finally, it’s extremely disappointing that environmental groups had to pressure the EPA for many months to even do its job and check into complaints about lower-than-expected mileage for certain vehicles.
The entire episode amounts to a shocking dereliction of duty by the EPA. It also, unfortunately, gives critics in Congress ammunition to attack the agency, which has important roles to play when it comes to cleaning up air and water.
For decades, the public has come to believe that the EPA essentially endorses whatever mileage statements are made by General Motors, Ford, Chrysler, Toyota, Honda and other carmakers.
But the controversy involving Hyundai and Kia tarnishes those two companies and the EPA. Plus, other major auto manufacturers such as GM are left to wonder whether the public will now distrust their estimates, too.
So were the recent errors honest mistakes? No one knows because the carmakers have not disclosed exactly what might have gone wrong.
Another problem: The EPA reportedly does not hire an outside expert to randomly check vehicles on the accuracy of their stated mileage claims using the same test that apparently brought to light the latest problems. Why did the agency stop such monitoring? Will it restart the program?
Cue up the once-again mum EPA officials who, as The Star noted, also refused to provide documents about the entire matter.
So much for being a public watchdog. In this case, the EPA seems more like an apologist for bad behaviour by parts of the auto industry.
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- 'Fried chicken' is no more a joke than the N-word
- Will stereotype perceptions of crack cocaine go to pot?
- Shocking exclusion
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Don’t confuse money with quality hospital care
- Vancouver water cheap, unmetered
- How to humble wing nuts
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- How to humble wing nuts
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- Shocking exclusion
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- How to humble wing nuts
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Housing homeless tackled
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Female chiefs needed
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- 'Longevity pensions' a promising idea
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.