Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Armstrong owes cancer 'heroes' the truth
Since Lance Armstrong was stripped of his seven Tour de France titles, outrage, shock and anger have proliferated. Amid that commentary, some have urged the public to look beyond Lance's denials about his systematic doping and focus instead on the hope and support he has provided for cancer patients.
I saw up close the positive effect Lance Armstrong had on the cancer community, when my health-care public relations firm Spectrum worked with him on behalf of our client Bristol-Myers Squibb between 1999 and 2005 -- the time he is now accused of doping and deceiving the public, including millions of cancer survivors who consider him a hero.
Now, however, Lance's cancer advocacy efforts sour me on the idea we need big names to gain support for causes and diseases. Perhaps it's not "heroes" like Lance to whom we should turn for inspiration. Instead, everyday cancer survivors are the ones who really earn and deserve accolades.
Spectrum conceived of and managed a program called the Tour of Hope, which featured Lance riding across the country with dozens of other skilled but amateur cyclists affected by cancer, whether survivors, researchers, caregivers or loved ones.
We organized this event as Lance claimed his final (former) Tour de France crowns, so his star was burning brightly. We knew his compelling story depended on his significant credibility and we won comprehensive media attention and attendance by thousands of cancer survivors, their families and friends to large and small events staged across the 5,000-kilometre route.
People who witnessed the Tour of Hope were star-struck by Lance's presence and he effectively used the national platform to encourage public attention to cancer clinical trials, to rally for more research funding from Congress and to promote patient compliance with cancer therapies. He also provided hope and inspiration for many cancer patients and survivors.
No miles nor words were wasted on the way. Taking cancer to task was the finish line. But once those crowds gathered, we noticed that, remarkably, the spotlight shifted.
It was the simple, heartwarming stories of the other riders that really touched people. Not many people could identify with larger-than-life Lance but many women could imagine the fear sports management professor Mary Kreis felt when she was pregnant and diagnosed with melanoma.
Darren Mullen's story of his wife's breast-cancer diagnosis and eventual death from the disease rang true for hundreds in attendance.
And when the Tour of Hope stopped at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, the biggest signs and loudest cheers were for Richard Shaffer, who had moved there to undergo treatment for esophageal cancer. It was a homecoming for Dick and the staff who cared for him welcomed him and rejoiced in his good health and his compelling story. Sadly, they were among the hundreds who mourned his death a year later, when Dick was remembered for both his passion for life and for finding a cure for cancer.
The Tour of Hope made spokespeople and advocates out of these everyday lives touched by cancer.
Lance Armstrong always delivered for cancer survivors. In hundreds of interviews, he stayed on message: If he can beat cancer and win the races, there's no limit to what cancer survivors anywhere can do.
Like many cycling fans and cancer survivors, I believed Lance when he tirelessly maintained he'd never failed a drug or doping test.
But here's the question for today: Why does the world need superstars, whether real or exposed later as fakes, to champion cancer or any other disease? Everyday cancer survivors are heroes enough for me. You don't have to cheat to win the race against cancer. You just need to do your best with the help of friends, caregivers and therapies based on legitimate science.
Those cancer survivors who were inspired by Lance particularly deserve to know the whole truth. Perhaps that is what he intends to finally deliver when he speaks to Oprah Winfrey this week. The history is clear: The American people forgive if you come clean. But if Lance continues to lash out and then hide and obfuscate, he will do a disservice to millions who looked up to him. This kind of betrayal will not be soon forgotten by cancer survivors who enthusiastically put their faith in him and his story. I'm not sure he wants to perpetuate the legacy of liar.
It's time to come clean, Lance -- if not for your former sponsors and cycling fans, then for Mary Kreis, Darren Mullen, Dick Shaffer and millions more who embraced you as a symbol of hope and true conquest.
John J. Seng is founder and president of the public relations firm Spectrum.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 14, 2013 A11
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 32 articles for this week)
The number of words MPs speak in House counts
1:00 AM 0As a measure of gauging the volume or quality of work of Canada's members of Parliament, a series of calculations ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- Japan's PM risks bankruptcy
- How to humble wing nuts
- Canada's super energy potential
- When Harper spoke, it was wise to listen
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- The number of words MPs speak in House counts
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- How to humble wing nuts
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Housing homeless tackled
- Why we assume the worst
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Female chiefs needed
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.