Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Beauty products should pass smell tests for hazards

  • Print

The makers of cosmetics are experts in the art of cover-up.

Researchers say the $60-billion beauty industry often fails to disclose the use of potentially dangerous ingredients in its products, including lead, phthalates, formaldehyde and triclosan -- and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration does not test or approve cosmetics before they go to market. Manufacturers are on the honour system, and that invites abuse, since most people tend to think things like makeup have been certified as safe.

Fortunately, big-box retailers Target and Walmart are pressuring manufacturers for safer cosmetics. But politicians should give the FDA power to recall products that are found to be potentially dangerous.

Target is leading the movement for transparency. It announced a policy last week that will push makers of beauty supplies, as well as household cleaners, to remove harmful chemicals from their products.

Target will work with consumer activists and a coalition of environmental and health organizations to create safety standards for rating cosmetics and cleaning products on a scale from zero to 100. Beginning in 2014, the ratings will appear on labels, educating consumers and encouraging manufacturers to avoid dangerous chemicals that will lower their ratings. Target said it would give preference in shelf placement to higher-rated products.

Walmart announced last month it would require suppliers to eliminate certain hazardous chemicals, which it has yet to specify, or it would stop selling their products. Together, these stores account for a huge share of the market, so they should make a difference.

The beauty industry argues its products are safe, noting fewer than 200 adverse reactions were reported last year to the 11 billion products sold. But in a 2012 study, the FDA found 380 of 400 lipsticks tested contained lead at more than 0.1 parts per million, the FDA's limit allowed in candy. Lipstick made by such popular brands as Maybelline and L'Oreal had 70 times more lead than the FDA's candy limit.

Congress has enacted a permanent ban on three types of phthalates in amounts greater than 0.1 per cent in children's toys and child care products. But phthalates are commonly used in perfumes, body sprays and colognes to hold scent. The FDA says the threat to adults is unclear, but there is evidence phthalates disrupt hormones in the human reproductive system, possibly causing infertility in males and early-onset of menopause in females. People would report a skin rash to a cosmetic company, but they would never think of these conditions as possibly related to their choice of cologne.

In any case, there is no good reason to refuse to list ingredients instead of categorizing a whole array of chemicals as "scent." Clearer labelling will make for more beauty in the eye of the beholder.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 24, 2013 A13

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Jets fans decibel level through roof for first playoff game at MTS Centre

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Marc Gallant/Winnipeg Free Press. Local- Peregrine Falcon Recovery Project. Baby peregrine falcons. 21 days old. Three baby falcons. Born on ledge on roof of Radisson hotel on Portage Avenue. Project Coordinator Tracy Maconachie said that these are third generation falcons to call the hotel home. Maconachie banded the legs of the birds for future identification as seen on this adult bird swooping just metres above. June 16, 2004.
  • A monarch butterfly looks for nectar in Mexican sunflowers at Winnipeg's Assiniboine Park Monday afternoon-Monarch butterflys start their annual migration usually in late August with the first sign of frost- Standup photo– August 22, 2011   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos


Do you think the Jets will win Game 4 on Wednesday?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google