22°c Partly cloudy
18°c Cloudy periods
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Cancer society makes common cause with tobacco giants
WHEN venerable anti-tobacco groups such as the American Cancer Society and cigarette-makers such as Altria align in opposition to a policy, it's got to be pretty bad, right? But, when it comes to whether health-insurance companies can charge higher premiums from smokers, the fact that these mortal enemies oppose the idea doesn't mean policy-makers should throw it out.
When U.S. President Barack Obama's 2010 health-care law kicks in next year, there will be only a few things for which insurance companies can charge you more -- your age, your location and whether you smoke. Smokers could face premiums that are up to 50 per cent higher than those of non-smokers. You'd think that anti-tobacco activists would cheer. In fact, The Post's Sarah Kliff reports, they have aligned with tobacco companies that want to eliminate the provision. Smokers are disproportionately low-income, and public-health groups worry that their premiums would be so expensive that many would choose to buy no insurance at all. That means a high-risk population would forgo needed disease screening and treatment, not to mention access to smoking-cessation coverage. Younger, healthier smokers would be more likely to opt out than would older, sicker ones, which could even raise insurance costs for everyone else. The Institute for Health Policy Solutions calculates that a married couple of older, low-income smokers could face premiums that equal as much as 48 per cent of total income.
Yet, as the institute's study also notes, there are also good reasons to charge smokers more. Their behaviour makes them prone to serious illnesses that are expensive to treat. If they don't pay for their smoking-related medical care, non-smokers would have to finance a big chunk of the cost for that treatment. It's also possible, though not proven, that higher insurance premiums would encourage smokers to quit.
These reasons alone wouldn't justify pricing a cohort of low-income Americans out of the health-insurance market. But policy-makers don't need to eliminate the rules entirely -- only refine them. By next year, that can happen at the state or federal level, and it should probably occur at both.
For example, the federal government has already proposed to grant smokers in group insurance plans relief from the surcharge if they participate in smoking-cessation programs. Federal policy-makers should seek to broaden that to the individual market. At the same time, they should make clearer what cessation products and techniques the government will require insurance companies to cover.
Individual states, meanwhile, can adjust the size of the maximum surcharge within their borders in various ways, ensuring a lower financial barrier to coverage. Though doing so could result in some smokers paying premiums that aren't quite high enough to reflect the health risks they are taking, they would still have to chip in more for their health-care costs, without driving them to give up on insurance.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 22, 2013 A9
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 6 articles for today)
Electronic footprints in a Google age
2:30 PM 0View Related
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Electronic footprints in a Google age
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Iran’s president-elect a glimmer of hope
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Firm sues governments over intellectual property
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Elijah Harper changed my world
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- That will be $90,000 down, please
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Erdogan — a Chavez-style strongman who gets results
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.