4°c A few clouds
18°c Sunny
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Christmas Tree Vibrator was considered a shocker
A 1947 patent for a "Christmas Tree Vibrator" turns out to be more confusing than risqué.
The inventor, Leo R. Smith, argued a vibrating tree was a way to make ornaments look prettier. The vibratory unit "for attachment to decorated trees" would "transmit a highly pleasing two-dimensional vibration thereto without interference with the decorations."
Smith thought Christmas trees, already beautiful, could please both ear and eye if they vibrated. "Normally shining light-weight Christmas decorations, such as tinsel, spun glass, tinfoil strips, mica particles, ornaments, etc." would "sparkle profusely." Meanwhile, decorations would emit a "pleasant rustling sound," "similar to the sound of sleet falling upon packed snow."
Although Smith's idea might seem eccentric, it must have sold at least a few units, as John W. Greer filed an updated patent for an Electronically Powered Apparatus for Imparting Vibratory Forces on a Tree in 1983. Greer observed that electrically powered tree vibrators such as Smith's had a drawback: "It requires the use of household current, which could produce an electrical shock or a fire-igniting spark if a defect exists in the motor or electric cord." Greer proposed to manufacture a unit with a battery-powered motor, to eliminate this hazard.
The invention, Greer argued, could save the homeowner not only worry but money. A vibrating tree could "cause the tinsel and ornaments on the tree to reflect the room or natural light, thus eliminating the need for Christmas tree lights."
Thanks to Penne L. Restad, author of Christmas in America: A History, for the tip.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 20, 2012 A14
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 34 articles for this week)
BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
1:00 AM 0What a difference a year has made for BlackBerry.
Twelve months ago, the company's annual conference was a gloomy, mournful affair, ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- This summer, check out health care elsewhere
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- How to make another bad winter for honeybees better
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Why we assume the worst
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Ice roads, airships could work together
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.