Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Colonel should reload -- with facts

  • Print

When Veterans Ombudsman Pat Stogran took to the stage this week with bitter complaints about shabby treatment for injured Canadian soldiers, I assumed it was a story that would carry on for a few days, at least.

It turned out to be a one-day flash-in-the pan because the story immediately morphed into a condemnation of the Harper government and the way it muzzles civil servants and gets rid of those it doesn't like.

As far as I could tell, no one was examining Stogran's allegations. Was he a loose cannon, or a hero? The answer really depends on the facts. Part of the problem, as I discovered after a few days of trying to get a response from Veterans Affairs, is that the issues are complicated and about as interesting as an actuarial table.

It didn't help that Stogran, a former lieutenant colonel who served in Afghanistan, did not do a very good job of making his case. He also weakened it when he said Remembrance Day was just a smokescreen for Ottawa's neglect, a bizarre comment that suggests his judgment has been clouded by his passion for the soldiers he no longer commands.

The government, also, wasn't interested in the details, preferring to accuse Stogran of sour grapes because his appointment was not being renewed. Harper told a press conference his government didn't believe in life-long appointments, but he had nothing to say about the ombudsman's allegations. True or false? He didn't seem to know or care.

And frankly, that seems to be the attitude of most Canadians. Beyond a handful of online comments and letters to the editor, the question of whether injured Canadian soldiers are being treated justly was forgotten as quickly as it was raised.

Stogran raised a smorgasbord of complaints, some of which are before the courts, but the leading irritant for ex-soldiers today is the compensation provisions of the Veterans Charter, which became law four years ago.

The new charter switched the emphasis from long-term disability pensions, that enabled veterans to do nothing, to a program similar to workers compensation, where rehabilitation and a return to the workforce are the guiding principles.

Prior to 2006, a soldier who lost a leg would receive a permanent pension of $1,678 a month and be sent on his or her way. Today, the same soldier would receive a lump sum of $193,000, which is less than the old monthly pension over a long period of time. More severe injuries are entitled to a larger payment, up to a maximum of $276,000, indexed annually.

The difference, however, is that the injured soldier would be entitled to a suite of medical, rehabilitation and vocational services that were not previously available. He or she would also receive 75 per cent of their military income during this period of recovery and adjustment. There are also programs for family members which also were not previously available. Soldiers who are permanently disabled are entitled to additional benefits. The list of compensation benefits is quite extensive, depending on the level of need, but veterans are right when they say it might add up to less hard cash than they used to receive.

In designing the specific programs, Veterans Affairs considered the approaches in other countries and by workers compensation boards, as well as how the courts deal with compensation, the department said in a written statement.

"More fundamentally, the department was guided by modern principles of disability management that focus on such concepts as early intervention, wellness, return to work where that is possible, and longer term supports where it is not."

The lump sum, the department said, "is more than is typical with workers compensation programs, and reasonably comparable to court awards."

If true, it means that injured Canadian soldiers probably don't have too much to complain about, unless you believe they are entitled to remarkable considerations because their injuries were sustained in the course of selfless and heroic sacrifice on behalf of Canadians.

Some people might see it that way, but they would be at least partially incorrect. Since the new charter was invoked, Veterans Affairs has taken on 23,364 new cases of soldiers who suffered some kind of injury. Obviously, many of these would be ordinary workplace accidents or cases of workplace stress unrelated to combat.

But maybe there should be two standards of compensation, one for combat and one for everything else? It's a questionable principle that would be a sharp deviation from past practice. Veterans of the Second World War, for example, were compensated equally, regardless if they were injured in battle or not, or even if they remained in Canada during the war.

Stogran said he intends to spend his last three months as ombudsman carrying the flag for veterans, but hopefully he will load his magazine with real arguments and not emotional appeals.

His initial volley suggests he never really retired his uniform.

 

dave.obrien@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 21, 2010 A18

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

In the Key of Bart: Can’t It Be Nice This Time?

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Marc Gallant/Winnipeg Free Press. Local/Standup- BABY BISON. Fort Whyte Centre's newest mother gently nudges her 50 pound, female bull calf awake. Calf born yesterday. 25 now in herd. Four more calfs are expected over the next four weeks. It is the bison's second calf. June 7, 2002.
  • A Great Horned Owl that was caught up in some soccer nets in Shamrock Park in Southdale on November 16th was rehabilitated and returned to the the city park behind Shamrock School and released this afternoon. Sequence of the release. December 4, 2012  BORIS MINKEVICH / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you support a proposed ban on tanning beds for youth under 18?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google