Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 22/12/2016 (186 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
Manitoba’s child-care system is struggling to meet the needs of parents and children, and recent signs give little confidence the new provincial government will respond effectively.
More than a dozen community groups who are ready to proceed with building not-for-profit child-care spaces have had their promised provincial capital grants abruptly frozen, halting all expansion. Wait lists for child care in Manitoba are at an all-time high at over 15,000 names, up from 12,000 just two years ago.
A lack of child care has serious economic consequences for parents and employers. A recent poll found 41 per cent of new parents had delayed returning to work and 30 per cent reported turning down a job because of problems finding child care. More than one in 10 had quit a job due to problems with child care.
Across Canada, child-care fees are skyrocketing; a recent study from the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives found rates increased by five per cent on average, or five times the rate of inflation, this past year. In Manitoba, innovative public policy has meant fees have been relatively stable and remain the second-lowest in the country.
Nevertheless, half of Manitoba parents report that child-care fees are a "strain" or "unaffordable." The subsidy system is badly out of date: just one in four families using child care qualifies today for any subsidy. In real terms, out-of-pocket child-care costs for a low-income Manitoba family are higher than in many other provinces.
Manitoba has just 34,285 licensed child-care spaces. Most parents cannot find a child-care space when they need it, and wait times of 14 to 20 months are common. Half of all Manitoba centres operate with conditional licences because they cannot recruit and retain trained and qualified staff due to poor wages.
Long waits and high fees are puzzling, since research shows the positive economic return on government investment in child care. Child care has positive economic impacts all across Canada. In Quebec, which spends $1.6 billion annually on its $7-a-day child-care plan, economists have found that public child care is actually "profitable," once the new taxes paid by newly working mothers are factored in. So it is curious that the Manitoba Progressive Conservatives are eschewing such economic growth.
Minister of Families Scott Fielding seems to be banking on creating spaces in family homes to close Manitoba’s child-care gap. About nine per cent of Manitoba’s child-care spaces are in private homes, a share that has been falling for years. Although a recent poll shows that 75 per cent of parents want centre-based care, family homes are preferred by the Progressive Conservatives.
Why? Homes may appear to be the less expensive option since there are virtually no capital costs associated with licensing a home for up to eight children. Moreover, no early childhood education credential is required, since a provincial licence can be given to anyone who completes a 40-hour introductory course within the first year of opening.
There are significant and longstanding problems in the private family home child-care sector, however. Many home-based daycares do not stay open long: half of Manitoba’s family homes close in four years or less, throwing families out of care when they close down. While some new homes open every year, existing homes also shut their doors: Manitoba has a net closure rate of 13.7 per cent, similar to rates researchers have found in B.C. Churning in the family home sector varies across the province, and is higher in rural areas: for example, a home in the Eastman region is 72 per cent less likely to remain open than a home in Winnipeg.
Other factors compound the problem. Close to one-third of family homes do not accept provincial funding, resulting in higher fees that shut out low-income subsidized families as well as children with additional support needs. Homes where the provider is taking care of her own children close at higher rates than homes where the provider’s own children are not present. Compared to centres, family homes are disproportionately over-represented in quality breaches such as licensing orders and suspensions.
The evidence shows that current private family home child-care policy is not successful in creating reliable, quality and stable services for children and parents. Family home child-care does not generate long-term, decent-paying jobs with benefits and pensions for providers, who are overwhelmingly women.
Contemporary families struggle to reconcile work and family and child-care services offer them a much needed resource — giving children good places to play, grow and learn while their parents are at work or school, promoting gender equity, facilitating employment and schooling and enhancing social inclusion.
In January 2016, the Manitoba Early Learning and Child Care Commission released its report. The Commission laid out a realistic set of recommendations for universal services. Investing in Manitoba’s child-care system is more than worth the costs.
History shows the value of redesigning public services. Beginning in 1890, under the Public Schools Act, Manitoba began to transform a rag-tag system of one-room schoolhouses into a provincially funded education system. Premier Brian Pallister’s government should apply the same provincewide thinking today to ensure all parents and children have the child-care services they need.
Susan Prentice is professor of sociology at the University of Manitoba and a CCPA Manitoba research associate.