17°c Partly cloudy
22°c Thundershowers
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Courts should decide fate of permanent residents
When Canadian citizens are convicted of a crime, they can face penalties that include jail time. When permanent residents are convicted of a crime, they also can face the possibility of deportation because they are not Canadian citizens. If deported, non-Canadians can face permanent removal from Canada.
Last month, the Supreme Court of Canada heard a case that will decide how criminal courts should treat permanent residents who break the law. The question the Supreme Court will decide is how the possibility of deportation should be considered when a permanent resident is being sentenced.
Because deportation is an additional penalty for permanent residents, they should be treated differently when being sentenced. This does not mean, however, that permanent residents should always be treated more leniently. In certain cases, judges should sentence permanent residents more harshly to increase the possibility of deportation.
It might seem unfair to treat non-Canadians differently than Canadians. Since Canadians cannot be deported from Canada, however, judges need to take this additional penalty into account.
In many cases, deportation is a more significant penalty than jail. Deportation can result in a person losing their ability to live in Canada. Deportees might lose their homes, jobs and the ability to be close to their families.
As a result, it is fair for judges to take this into account when sentencing permanent residents who commit crimes.
In some cases, judges should sentence a permanent resident more leniently because of the possibility of deportation.
For instance, if a permanent resident is convicted of a first offence that could result in deportation but that person has been living in Canada for 30 years, has a spouse and children here, has a good job, and has tried to turn his or her life around between the time of arrest and the time of trial, they might be deserving of a sentence that reduces the possibility of deportation.
If a permanent resident, however, has a history of violence, has a long criminal record, has a history of substance abuse, has only been in Canada for a few years, and has no family or job in Canada, a much harsher sentence that would hasten deportation may be appropriate.
Currently, the law does not let criminal courts decide if a person should be deported.
These decisions are made by a separate tribunal, known as the Immigration and Refugee Board, months and sometimes years after the original criminal conviction. The question is: why not let criminal courts decide if a person should be deported?
In my view, a criminal court is a better place to assess this. Criminal court judges have the advantage of hearing all of the evidence of the crime and also they hear directly from victims during sentencing.
In addition, if criminal court judges are given these powers, decisions on deportations would be made much more quickly.
In the present system, the Immigration and Refugee Board typically only reviews the criminal court's paper file. The board usually does not hear directly from the witnesses who were at court, nor does it often hear from victims.
In order for justice to be done, the judge who hears from the police, victims, witnesses, and the convicted criminal should be the one who makes a decision on the appropriate penalty.
If criminal court judges are given this power, these matters will be addressed in one process as opposed to piece-meal. Society and the convicted criminal deserve a quick answer to this question.
Currently, a law is going through Parliament that could increase the possibility of deportation for permanent residents sentenced to six months or more in jail. If this law passes, it will be increasingly important for criminal court judges to have the power to decide whether a permanent resident should be deported or not.
R. Reis Pagtakhan is an immigration lawyer with Aikins Law in Winnipeg.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 8, 2013 A8
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 33 articles for this week)
Crazy Pete's an off-the-wall way of life
3:18 AM 0THOMPSON -- Ask Peter Zaworonok what the weirdest thing he sells is and he needs some clarification.
"It depends what you ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- The Brazilian middle class awakens
- Hidden no more
- Hike to PST will bite Manitobans hard
- Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Bernanke averted a global depression
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Firm sues governments over intellectual property
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- The Brazilian middle class awakens
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Hidden no more
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Hidden no more
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.