Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Cross my heart and hope to die...
Telling lies is a pervasive human trait and most people fail to detect they are being lied to, research shows.
For most people, telling nose-stretchers is daily behaviour. According to researcher Aldert Vrij of the University of Portsmouth, on average people lie to 34 per cent of everyone with whom they have contact, about two fibs a day. Studies show 83 per cent of job applicants provide untruthful information; 90 per cent of people lie to get a date. Married individuals lie in one-of-ten interactions with spouses.
According to Jeffrey Hancock of Cornell University, 37 per cent of lies are told during phone conversations, 27 per cent face-to-face and 21 per cent via instant messaging.
E-mails are the vehicle of choice for many liars. Research by Zachary Birchmeier at Miami University indicates "bogus self-representation" is especially common in Internet communications, and that "high status" people are most likely to fib in e-mails.
"Liars want to be able to assure themselves and others that there is something honest about what they are saying...some wisp of truth," explained researcher Bella de Paulo of the University of California. "The best liars are people who don't feel badly about (lying)."
That is why 75 per cent of liars say they would repeat their lies under the same circumstances.
A propensity to lie is "an evolved feature of the human mind," says David Smith of the New England Institute for Cognitive Science and Evolutionary Biology.
Telling lies works because most people cannot detect when they are being told untruths. Research by de Paulo and Charles Bond of Texas Christian University shows people can correctly detect about 54 per cent of the lies they are told.
"Rates of detection vary little from study to study," the researchers agree. "In particular, people regard their interactions with partners as honest."
De Paulo attributes minimal lie-detection capabilities to a lack of "polygraphs, brain sensors or other bells or whistles to help them figure (lies) out."
Several studies show police officers and others with experience in interviewing people are better at ferreting out liars. A 2002 study showed police officers, on average, detect liars about 65 per cent of the time; some individual officers detect 90 per cent of all lies they are told, others only 30 per cent.
Research by Maureen O'Sullivan of the University of San Francisco indicates about one person in 1,000 is a natural lie-detection "wizard", capable of discovering fibs "almost every time" by means of a combination of cues.
According to Vrij, liars often have one or more of the following traits: speech hesitations, changes in voice pitch, blinking, scratching or rubbing body parts, finger gestures, shrugging and shifting body position.
Liars often give fewer details, and use fewer words (often one-word answers) in replying to questions.
Lies vary in magnitude: "white" lies, self-serving lies, actual blatant deceit and concealing-of-information lies.
According to studies at Queen's University, people most often tell self-serving lies to strangers and "harsh truths" are most often given by e-mail.
"False positive" lies, such as those regarding compliments on clothing or food quality, are up to 20 times more prevalent than lies regarding guilt, the research shows.
Robert Alison is a zoologist
based in Victoria, B.C.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 27, 2010 H6
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Shocking exclusion
- Will stereotype perceptions of crack cocaine go to pot?
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Flat-rate property tax tabled
- Airports belong to Canadian taxpayers
- Vancouver water cheap, unmetered
- Boston bomber love-bombed by fangirls
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- How to humble wing nuts
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Shocking exclusion
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Flat-rate property tax tabled
- Shocking exclusion
- How to humble wing nuts
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Manitoba showed that a 'Senate' can be abolished
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Female chiefs needed
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- 'Longevity pensions' a promising idea
- Fisher could have been paid $16,000 for his 'wasted fish'
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.