Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Debate's Round 2 goes to 'lucky' Obama

  • Print

When two U.S. presidential candidates battle roughly to a tie in a debate, is there a winner?

Did President Obama win on Tuesday simply because he was able to hold his own this time on the debate stage with Mitt Romney? Did Romney win because the momentum he had built during the last two weeks wasn't completely reversed?

The pressure on the president was greater, of course, because of his disastrous showing in the first debate two weeks ago, when Romney seized control and Obama barely registered a coherent objection. A second loss would have been disastrous for the president's campaign.

But this time, a different Obama showed up. The president was feisty, assertive and energized. He questioned Romney's arithmetic; he attacked his opponent's honesty; he reminded voters of the severely conservative positions Romney took during his long quest for the GOP nomination, and he rebutted Republican attacks on his record.

"Governor Romney doesn't have a five-point plan," Obama charged. "He has a one-point plan -- and that plan is to make sure folks at the top play by a different set of rules."

And yet, for all that, the Long Island town meeting wasn't a knockout for Obama. The relentlessly on-message Romney who surprised Obama in Denver showed up again on Tuesday, and scored plenty of the same points.

"The president's policies haven't put people back to work," he said. "We don't have to live like this. ...My priority is jobs. I know how to make that happen.

"If you elect President Obama, you know what you're going to get. You're going to get a repeat of the last four years," he said.

The central exchanges of the debate played out like a slugfest between two boxers with very different styles but roughly equal strength. Romney attacked Obama's record, especially on the economy; Obama responded by attacking Romney's credibility.

So where does that leave us? Just about where we expected to be at this point, with an extremely close election.

Partisans will score the bout according to their tastes. Democrats will hail it as the revival of their champion in his current populist persona. Republicans will argue that Romney eviscerated the Obama record, and that the president didn't present much of a program to show how his second term might improve on the first.

And both sides, oddly, will be mostly right. The candidates' second debate confirmed what polls were already telling us: The campaign has returned to its pre-convention deadlock, a race that's within a single percentage point nationwide and too close to call in battleground states such as Ohio and Virginia.

For that reason, if I had to call the debate, I'd give it to Obama -- not on substance but on what it did for his prospects.

For a week or so, it appeared that Romney was gaining momentum above and beyond the bump he got from his upset victory in the first debate. Enthusiasm was leaching out of Democratic ranks at the very moment they needed to rally volunteers to hector their voters to the polls. That erosion has probably now been stopped.

And Obama had good moments on at least two important issues.

The president largely won an exchange over equal pay for women -- the quintessential swing voters in this election -- noting that he signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act into law over the opposition of many Republicans. Romney argued that his record as governor of Massachusetts, when he took pains to include women in his cabinet and get them home in time for dinner, was female-friendly, but it sounded distinctly second-best.

And Obama used a tough question about inadequate security at the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, to man up. "I'm the president and I'm always responsible," he said, adding that the suggestion that his administration was playing politics with the issue "when we lost four of our own... (was) offensive."

The president capitalized, as well, on a rash decision by Romney to volunteer that contrary to popular belief, "I care about 100 per cent of the American people."

That gave Obama the opening he needed, in the final moments of the debate, to remind voters of Romney's disastrous assertion that 47 per cent of Americans are dependent on the government and short on personal responsibility.

"Think about who he was talking about," Obama said. "Folks on social security. Veterans who have sacrificed for their country. ...I want to fight for them."

An ancient rule of politics holds that it is better to be lucky than smart. In Tuesday's debate, both candidates turned in smart performances -- but Obama was also lucky. His campaign can only hope that was an omen for the remaining three weeks of the campaign.

Doyle McManus is a columnist

for The Los Angeles Times.

--McClatchy Tribune Services

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 18, 2012 A10

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Gary Lawless & Tim Campbell on the Jets' inconsistency - Jets This Week Oct. 16

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A baby Red Panda in her area at the Zoo. International Red Panda Day is Saturday September 15th and the Assiniboine Park Zoo will be celebrating in a big way! The Zoo is home to three red pandas - Rufus, Rouge and their cub who was born on June 30 of this year. The female cub has yet to be named and the Assiniboine Park Zoo is asking the community to help. September 14, 2012  BORIS MINKEVICH / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS
  • Goslings with some size head for cover Wednesday afternoon on Commerce Drive in Tuxedo Business Park - See Bryksa 30 Goose Challenge- Day 12- May 16, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Are you still on the Bombers' and Jets' bandwagons?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google