Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Editorial unfairly attacks Winnipeg's thin blue line
A Free Press editorial (Bottom, not blue line thin, Jan. 28) dismissing our concerns about the current operational review of the Winnipeg Police Service is inconsistent with the goal of protecting taxpayers' wallets without diminishing efforts to protect citizens.
The Winnipeg Police Association along with a Canadian expert the city recently hired have stated that, with the imminent establishment of a new police oversight board and the hiring of a new chief, hiring an outside consultant is redundant and a waste of taxpayer's money.
Further concerns arise when the outcome of this examination by the U.S. firm Matrix Consulting is so transparently predetermined. Everyone should share the association's concerns rather than be suspicious of them.
Why, for example, have civic politicians openly declared that tens of millions of dollars will be saved? Such clairvoyance ought to be questioned.
On the other hand, if such knowledge exists before the review commences, should not the details be revealed along with the apparent conclusions?
Police officers have been open to participate in any sincere examination of police operations in order to do our jobs more efficiently. The association, in fact, recently publicized four concrete suggestions that would undoubtedly result in significant savings. (Available at winnipegpoliceassociation.ca.)
We have made clear and concrete suggestions toward improving public safety and have taken tangible steps to illustrate our commitment to serving the citizens we are sworn to protect. Our cadet program, the envy of many other police services, permits officers to concentrate on other urgent and serious matters.
The standard claim that policing costs 26 per cent of the civic budget is dubious at best. More than 160 police positions (10 per cent) are externally funded. Those funds are put directly back into city coffers.
Other cost-recovery mechanisms such as the civil-forfeiture unit also reduce the real bottom line.
The editorial focused on homicides when discussing efficiencies. We wish a slightly deeper examination of the facts had been conducted.
When it comes to safety on our streets, the public's sense of insecurity goes beyond mere perception. In recent years, data clearly illustrate that Winnipeg is by far the leader in virtually every violent-crime category.
In 2010, in a nationwide comparison of major cities, Winnipeg police solved homicides at a greater rate and at about half the cost of most others examined.
For their efficiency, our homicide investigators are repeatedly rewarded with a substantially greater frequency of audits than any other unit within the police service.
In 2011, Winnipeg had the most homicides per capita of any Canadian city since such record-keeping began.
How does any sensible person propose police managers mitigate the alarming rate at which some stick a knife in another's rib cage or blow a hole in another's chest with fewer resources?
Police are merely one aspect of an entire justice system. We must constantly adapt to meet pressures and expectations imposed upon us by others with greater political influence inside the system.
It is somewhat demoralizing to be the subject of less-than-subtle insinuations that somehow police officers are to blame for civic fiscal woes, on top of other systemic shortcomings.
It has often been said policing is a thankless profession. The recent Free Press editorial certainly lends credence to that adage.
Mike Sutherland is president of
the Winnipeg Police Association.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 6, 2013 A7
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 30 articles for this week)
Peace process with Taliban fragile
06/19/2013 1:58 PM 0Past attempts by the Obama administration to start peace talks with the Afghan Taliban foundered in part because the process ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- The Brazilian middle class awakens
- Hike to PST will bite Manitobans hard
- Hidden no more
- Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Bernanke averted a global depression
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Firm sues governments over intellectual property
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- The Brazilian middle class awakens
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Hidden no more
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Hidden no more
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.