Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Fighting for a fishery

The Churchill River Diversion swamped lucrative whitefish fishery

  • Print
The northern community of South Indian Lake, seen here in 1984, was disrupted by Manitoba Hydro projects.

Enlarge Image

The northern community of South Indian Lake, seen here in 1984, was disrupted by Manitoba Hydro projects.

In the 1970s, the provincial government allowed Manitoba Hydro to divert the second largest river in the province and flood the fourth largest lake, displacing a vibrant community in the process.

The project, known as Churchill River Diversion, was contentious. A provincial election was lost over it. Eventually though, a scaled-back version of the diversion went ahead, having been sold to the citizens of Manitoba on the basis it would contribute to a brighter future and be operated according to water flows and levels as set out in a 1973 interim Water Power Act licence.

This was the moral contract that allowed for our community of South Indian Lake to be forcibly moved and our environment turned upside down. This is what we believed to be the deal. Sadly, that contract has been largely ignored.

Instead of requiring Hydro to finalize the interim licence -- as was supposed to happen shortly after construction -- the government has allowed the utility to continually and flagrantly stretch the terms of the licence.

As for the promised brighter future, we're still waiting.

The water on our lake first went up in 1976. Southern Indian Lake is essentially a widening of the Churchill River, which flows eastward across the province, emptying into Hudson Bay at the town of Churchill. The Missi Falls Control Structure blocks the eastern outflow of the lake, causing it to rise. The swollen lake overflows southward through a man-made channel into a 300-plus kilometre diversion route down the Rat-Burntwood River system. That system then empties into the Nelson River where Manitoba Hydro's primary dams are located.

The diversion increases the power producing potential of the Nelson River dams by up to 40 per cent. It also turns our lake into a reservoir in which Hydro can store water for when it is needed.

Hydro's benefits come at our expense. The effects of the Churchill River Diversion are drastic. More than 800-square-kilometres of land are permanently flooded. Thousands of kilometres of critical shoreline habitat are affected. We see severe shoreline destabilization and erosion. Natural fluctuations of water throughout the seasons -- which are essential for the health of shoreline ecosystems -- are a thing of the past. The dams to the east and south of us prevent natural fish migration.

Our lake is sick and dying -- the result of "clean" hydro.

The diversion has also created a legacy of social, economic and cultural harm. First was the indignity of the Manitoba government imposing the project on us without our consent. Second, the community of South Indian Lake was forced to move because of the flooding. This move created lasting trauma for many of our people.

Then our fur industry and prized fishery -- the economic base of our community -- started to decline.

Prior to the Churchill River Diversion, the whitefish fishery on South Indian Lake was the second largest of its kind in North America, producing a million pounds of Grade A whitefish annually. In the years after the water went up, the numbers dropped to 600,000 pounds. The decline has continued. Last season we got less than 100,000 pounds of all types of fish combined.

The fishery was the cornerstone of our community for generations. Its collapse means a dismal future for the many households that relied on fishing. It also reduces options for our youth.

South Indian Lake was originally established because of the great abundance of fish and fur for both domestic and commercial purposes. For generations we were prosperous, culturally vibrant and economically independent.

We know our lake will never return to its original glory, but we feel if Hydro were required to live up to the seemingly long-forgotten original licence terms, we would at least have a fighting chance to rebuild our fishery and our future.

The 1973 interim licence required Hydro to maintain the lake level between 844 and 847 feet above sea level. Most important in our view, it allowed Hydro a maximum draw down of the lake within any 12-month period of two feet. Those were the terms on which the project was sold to our people. That is how we believed it was going to be operated.

In 1978 Hydro asked to test the diversion operations over an increased range of water level fluctuations. This "testing" -- in violation of licence terms -- persisted over the years, with the government's knowledge. In 1986, the government gave written permission for what it called the Augmented Flow Program, which essentially replaced the terms of the Churchill River Diversion licence. It allowed Hydro to flood the lake by another half foot, and instead of a maximum two-foot drawdown of the lake in any 12-month period, the new maximum was 4.5 feet.

Never did Hydro or the government come to our community to consult us about this. This fundamentally changed what we believed to be our moral contract with the government, but we did not consent to it.

Nor has the government ever required a comprehensive environmental review of this project that drastically alters the second largest river and fourth largest lake in the province as well as the 300-km diversion route.

The government continues to approve the augmented-flow program annually.

Now, Hydro has finally applied to have the 40-year-old interim licence finalized, but the version they want finalized is the augmented flow water regime, not the original one. Hydro's application includes no changes to what has become business as usual for them. We find this shocking. Change is what we have desperately needed for decades. Business as usual is the destruction of our people and lands.

The Commercial Fishermen's Association of South Indian Lake calls on the Manitoba government to require Manitoba Hydro to operate the Churchill River Diversion according to the terms under which it was originally licensed.

We also call on the government to hold public hearings as part of the diversion's final-licensing process. They have done this with respect to Lake Winnipeg regulation, which is also subject to a greatly belated final licensing process. If southern cottagers deserve a public hearing so do northern fishers.

For decades we have asked ourselves: What right does the government have to authorize the destruction of our community and surrounding lands? By what right has it allowed Manitoba Hydro to stretch the original licence beyond recognition?

We have sacrificed so much for the sake of Manitoba Hydro. And we recognize the proposed new dams would also benefit greatly from the Churchill River's diversion. As much as 40 per cent of water flowing through them would come from our flooded lake. That is not acknowledged.

We were promised the Churchill River Diversion would not only operate according to the original licence, but it would contribute to a bright future. We ask the government to honour its word. Government leaders speak about a new era of hydro development. We are waiting for that era to arrive in South Indian Lake.


Steve Ducharme is president of the South Indian Lake Commercial Fishermen's Association.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 10, 2013 A9

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Rumor's 30th Anniversary with Mike Wilmot, Darryl Lenox, Dave Hemstad & Derek Edwards

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • June 24, 2012 - 120624  -  Amusement riders on the last day of The Ex Sunday June 24, 2012.    John Woods / Winnipeg Free Press
  • A young goose   reaches for long strands of grass Friday night near McGillvary Blvd-See Bryksa 30 Day goose challenge- Day 19 - May 23, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Would you visit Dalnavert Museum if it reopened?

View Results

Ads by Google