28°c A few clouds
15°c Cloudy periods
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Gutting the Fisheries Act
Among the Harper government's latest environmental reforms -- packed like sardines into the budget -- Canada's Fisheries Act will soon protect fish habitat only in designated waterways.
So long minister, and thanks for all the dead fish.
How did the federal budget come to this?
It used to be that fish habitat was protected in all the places where fish live. How innocently logical this was. The government has a new message for the fish: stay in your ponds or else.
It's a matter of fish discrimination.
You might ask, aren't all waterways vital for the fish that live there? Isn't it hard for a fish to know if a pond is vital or merely a luxury?
Evidently not. Deep in Bill C-38 lies a brave new approach to fish habitat protection. Instead of barring destruction of "fish habitat," the Fisheries Act will now protect only those fish that are part of "a commercial, recreational or aboriginal fishery." Thus, the government will identify vital lakes and rivers, where fish may live subject to environmental protection, and then tweet instructions to the fish.
This is a terrific vote of confidence in the government, especially in our Conservative leaders. I can see them now. Fisheries Minister Keith Ashfield dressed as a grizzly to scare the salmon from their usual spawning grounds. The prime minister's chief of staff blaring into a megaphone, "Get back in the lake, or fish heads will roll!" Any fish that disobeys will be bulldozed or poisoned. Vital fish, take heed.
Behold the economist's logic of deficit cum fish-habitat reduction: "Out of the pond Flipper."
As Ashfield explained: "It makes good, common sense that the government should be able to minimize or eliminate restrictions on commonplace activities that pose little to no threat and, at the same time, maintain appropriate, reasonable, and responsible protection for Canada's fisheries."
Thankfully, this gibberish makes good sense to fish. If only Brian Tobin and other Liberals spoke fish, they could have told the cod to stay on Canada's vital side of the line in the ocean, safe from Spanish trawlers.
Note to the Harper government: fish are smart, but not that smart. Like ministers, they have instincts that are hard to control. Unlike ministers, fish have a weird, not to say miraculous, ability to return to their natural spawning grounds after years of mysterious but glorious migrations.
Even if the fish could hear you, minister, they are stubborn. They are set in their waterways and not inclined to take orders from politicians. Give them freedom or give them death.
Also in the budget, besides amending the Fisheries Act in this way, the government guts the Environmental Assessment Act, revises the Species at Risk Act, repeals the Kyoto Implementation Act, and dumps the National Round Table on Environment and Economy. A film critic would say: too many plots.
The budget is, in fact, a disguised and brutal assault on Canadian environmental law. It is the mark of a regime that thinks it can make the fish swim on time. It is a budget in which nature is subjected to a finance minister's eye for efficiency. Cut non-vital lakes, trim rivers, re-direct fish, let the provinces do the rest (or not; whatever).
Next year the government might want to pack all its legislation into the budget and shutter Parliament for the summer, fall, and winter. To cut costs, a single minister (of finance) could run the country.
If Ashfield really has learned fish-speak, perhaps he could try having a word with those pesky F-35s? Otherwise, he should stay in the piranha pool and leave the fish to their lakes and rivers. The rest of us appreciate fish habitat, too.
Gus Van Harten is a professor at Osgoode Hall Law School. He studied Canadian environmental law in the days when it meant something.
-- Troy Media
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 3, 2012 A10
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 6 articles for today)
Peace process with Taliban fragile
1:58 PM 0Past attempts by the Obama administration to start peace talks with the Afghan Taliban foundered in part because the process ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Hike to PST will bite Manitobans hard
- Hidden no more
- Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Firm sues governments over intellectual property
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Iran’s president-elect a glimmer of hope
- Street art stifled in Winnipeg
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Here comes War of 1812
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.