Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
'Hijabi glass ceiling' is a form of discrimination, too
With her white hijab and the slight gap between her teeth, Fatma Nabil looks like my cousin. She probably looks like everybody's cousin.
Yet after presenting the afternoon news last week, Fatma became the most recognizable face on Egyptian television: She is, after all, Egypt's first veiled TV news anchor. Ever.
Is this a (small) revolution, as it has been painted in many -- mostly foreign -- media outlets? Yes, but not for the reasons most think.
Allowing Fatma Nabil on air signifies the end of a decades-long policy of discrimination against hijabi newscasters in publicly owned broadcasting organizations, where covering one's hair meant being banned from airtime.
This is a reversal of a long-outdated and unfair policy. At the same time, as people in Arab countries have been watching Arab TV channels for years now, the sight of a veiled newsreader is neither shocking nor unusual. This story, then, really shouldn't have been a big deal.
In a country where nearly 90 per cent of adult Muslim women wear a headscarf, it's the banning of headscarf-wearers from television that should have been the real story, not the opposite. The ban was enforced by Mubarak's long-serving minister of information, Safwat Al-Sharif, and has produced a number of lawsuits from women who were affected by the law. First Lady Suzanne Mubarak was notorious for her staunch anti-hijab position -- which went as far as influencing the appointment of male ministers based on whether their wives were veiled or not.
When Harry Roselmack became the first black, prime-time evening newscaster on France's TF1 channel in 2006, his appointment was hailed as the rectification for the country's long-standing discrimination, creating a successful and positive role model for black youth -- as well as challenging the traditional and exclusionary self-image that to be "French" is to be white.
I was reminded of this story when I first saw Fatma Nabil on TV. Her appointment to the afternoon newscast (not the more popular evening news, mind you) will, I believe, also send a positive message to millions of young women who have hit the "hijab glass ceiling" and have been discriminated against for their religious and sartorial choices.
Such discrimination is pervasive in public and private institutions. The diplomatic service is one such prestigious government body that has been known to discriminate against veiled women, both in recruitment and in foreign missions. Women who insist on wearing veils are often kept in domestic offices or are restricted to serving in Islamic countries.
The appearance of this veiled woman on Egyptian television is not a manifestation of the Muslim Brotherhood imposing its will on national television. (While the Brotherhood is indeed trying to manipulate public opinion, this particular instance is not a manifestation of such a policy. A newsreader, after all, does not control what she reads.)
If one wants to look for the Brotherhoodization of Egyptian television, look to the appointment of a Brotherhood member, Salah Abdel-Maksoud, as minister of information. Look at programming, at what is being allowed or censored. The issue of free media deserves our close attention -- but it would be counterproductive to flag apparent false positives such as Fatma Nabil's appointment.
I am glad for her and hope this will be the beginning of the end of a shameful policy of discrimination.
El Dahshan works for the African Development Bank and teaches development economics at Cairo's Ain-Shams University.
--Foreign Policy
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 13, 2012 A11
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 34 articles for this week)
This summer, check out health care elsewhere
1:00 AM 0For many Canadians, the Victoria Day long weekend marks the beginning of summertime holiday planning, if not a late-May escape ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Clothing sellers should unite on Bangladesh
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- ‘Signs’ of hope, little more, in Greece
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- How to make another bad winter for honeybees better
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Internet becoming a jungle
- Canada and the Arctic Council
- Making NRC tool of industry bad for science
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- Why we assume the worst
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.