Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

If criminal behaviour is genetic, should it be punished?

  • Print
Criminals might be "born to be bad," genetically and inextricably pre-programmed at birth to engage in violent and other criminal behaviour, accumulating evidence suggests.

The concept of a "crime gene," and the explanation "my genes made me do it," are gaining in acceptance among many researchers. This development is generating novel challenges in criminal prosecutions.

In 1907, Sir Francis Galton first put forward the theory of "inheritance of criminal tendancies." Since then, sophisticated studies have increasingly confirmed a genetic basis for some criminal actions.

"Genetics and molecular biology have provided some significant insights into behaviour associated with inherited disorders," confirmed Joseph McInerney of the Foundation for Genetic Education and Counseling.

Recently, the Italian judiciary reduced the sentence of a convicted murderer on the grounds that his genes predisposed him to commit homicide.

"The odds of becoming a criminal are not equal at birth," suggested Irving Gottesman of the University of Virginia.

Preliminary information indicates that most criminal behaviour could be inescapably inherited.

"Individuals with these genes could find themselves engaging in criminal activity," suggested Caitlin Jones at Rochester Institute of Technology. "There is a genetic component to criminal behaviour."

Increasingly, defence attorneys are requesting that judges admit evidence suggesting clients are genetically predisposed towards violent or other criminal actions -- the so-called "DNA defence."

At issue is a body of research linking criminal behaviour to certain inherited genes. A 2008 study at Hebrew University in Israel identified argenine vasopresser receptor-1 (AVPR1 gene) as a cause for "ruthless" behaviour. Research in 2009 by Rose McDermott at Brown University uncovered a "warrior gene" responsible for high levels of aggression in response to provocation.

In 1995, a Dutch study showed that males in a family whose members repeatedly engaged in crime had a mutated monoamine oxidase-A (MAOA) gene. Recently, Kevin Beaver's research confirmed that boys with mutated MAOA genes are more likely to join gangs.

Last year, Guang Guo and colleagues showed the same MAOA variant generates violent delinquency. Research at the Civic Research Institute suggests MAOA is a "disinhibiting" gene, and mutations make people more likely to commit crimes.

According to Debrah Denno at Fordham Law School, "many people who commit homicides also have... relatives who are incarcerated."

She explained that "genetic mitigation" can show that an offender might not be responsible for his actions.

Sarnoff Mednick at the University of California confirms that adopted children whose biological parents are criminals are much more likely to become criminals themselves, even if their adopted parents are law-abiding.

If criminals are genetically pre-programmed to commit crimes, then the assumption that incarceration might reshape criminal behaviour could be flawed. According to a 2003 ruling of the New York Supreme Court, genetic predispostion evidence raises the ugly matter of "future dangerousness."

Of critical significance, as pointed out by philosopher Don Brock, is the conundrum that if an individual's genes are a principle cause of behaviour, and if those genes are unalterable, and their effects unchangeable, is it justifiable to be held responsible for the resultant actions?

Robert Alison has a PhD in zoology and is based in Victoria, B.C.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 7, 2010 A11

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Reimagining Winnipeg as the big city of the future

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A goose cools off Thursday in water at Omands Creek Park-See Bryksa 30 day goose challenge- Day 25– June 21, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • PHIL.HOSSACK@FREEPRESS.MB.CA Winnipeg Free Press 090528 STAND UP...(Weather) One to oversee the pecking order, a pack of pelican's fishes the eddies under the Red River control structure at Lockport Thursday morning......

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Do you support Canada's involvement in the fight against Islamic State?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google