17°c Clear
25°c Chance of thundershowers
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Immigration law needs lighter touch
Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has recently stoked national debate about the rescinding of citizenship for thousands of immigrants who only fleetingly lived in this country. Many Canadians could support such a move.
But a story out of Regina should give us pause to think about drastic action taken against foreign nationals who run afoul of immigration law by what, comparatively, seems a less offensive infraction.
Two foreign students face possible deportation for illegally working in Canada. While it appears that these students did work in Canada illegally, does Canada need to come down so hard on them?
Their offence -- working two weeks at a big box store without authorization -- is hardly the stuff of Bonnie & Clyde. There has got to be a better the solution.
According to news reports, these two students got Social Insurance Numbers (which most foreign students are entitled to get) and mistakenly thought that this allowed them to work wherever they wanted. Under the law, they were only allowed to work on campus -- which they did the year before.
After starting at the big box store, one of the students claimed that she realized that she was working illegally and quit after two weeks. The second student claimed that she did not realize that she was working illegally until she was led away from the store in handcuffs by the Canada Border Services Agency.
Handcuffs? For working illegally as a cashier for two weeks? This seems extreme.
Because of the prospect of deportation, the two students sought sanctuary at a church. As well, officials at the university they attended wrote to Kenney to ask that he grant them a reprieve. According to reports, the minister's office replied that he "does not have the authority to stay removal orders under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act."
Should Canada enforce its immigration laws? Absolutely.
Should Canada allow persons to work illegally in Canada? Absolutely not.
Should Canada remove these two from Canada? No.
First, it should be said that ignorance of the law is no excuse. If these students were issued the standard type of immigration study permits, they would have seen that these documents clearly indicate that their ability to work in Canada is restricted. It seems clear there is no dispute that what they did was illegal under immigration laws. So, there should be no dispute that they should be punished.
Still, the question is: why is the penalty so harsh?
Even if there is more to this story than what has been reported, one of the biggest problems in immigration law is that there is really only one enforcement mechanism -- removal from Canada. Sure, there are provisions in the law that allow for fines to be issued. However, the threat of deportation sometimes seems to be the only tool used.
The answer is to make minor immigration violations "ticketable" offences. In other words, instead of using the nuclear option -- deportation -- for every violation of immigration law, immigration enforcement officers should have an expanded ability to issue tickets.
They can do that now, but CBSA chooses to prosecute cases.
Tickets could carry stiff fines to send the message that Canada does not tolerate illegal behaviour. And it should carry the hammer that it is a person's first and last warning, that re-offending would trigger consideration of deportation.
If these two students had faced a ticket, there would be no story. Then the resources put into enforcement could have been dedicated to chasing the big offenders -- human traffickers, foreign criminals, persons accused of war crimes, and the 3,000-plus individuals who Kenney says obtained Canadian citizenship by lying. Offences carried out by these types of individuals should not be penalized by a mere ticket.
Is it really the best use of our tax dollars to chase after two foreign students who worked illegally for two weeks? No.
It would be better to create a system that gives minor offenders a stern lesson as to what is expected of them. If this happens, immigration enforcement officers could then put their efforts in chasing down the big offenders.
R. Reis Pagtakhan is an immigration lawyer with Aikins Law in Winnipeg.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition September 24, 2012 A10
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 33 articles for this week)
Crazy Pete's an off-the-wall way of life
3:18 AM 0THOMPSON -- Ask Peter Zaworonok what the weirdest thing he sells is and he needs some clarification.
"It depends what you ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- The Brazilian middle class awakens
- Hike to PST will bite Manitobans hard
- Hidden no more
- Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Bernanke averted a global depression
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Firm sues governments over intellectual property
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- The Brazilian middle class awakens
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Hidden no more
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Hidden no more
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.