Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Internet is threat to fair jury trials

  • Print

The rules for use of Twitter, Facebook and other social media in Canadian courts are still being ironed out.

Most Canadian courts permit accredited journalists to use electronic devices -- laptops, tablet computers, smart phones -- in the courtroom, unless a judge restricts their use. Saskatchewan, Alberta and British Columbia are the only provinces that have formal rules that allow, and govern, journalists tweeting or messaging from trials and appeals. In Manitoba, most courts permit reporters' live Twitter feeds to media web pages.

But their use by everyone else -- jurors, witnesses and courtroom spectators -- is pretty much left to the discretion of the individual judge hearing a case.

Putting some across-the-board rules in place, especially for jurors, is past due.

That jury members should be barred from accessing social media and Internet websites to view, or generate, content about an accused or the trial via smart phones or tablet computers is pretty much universally agreed.

How to enforce that prohibition is the rub.

A judge can order jurors not to use digital devices to access or post information about the trial. But monitoring and enforcing that order is nearly impossible. Flocks of sheriff's officers would have to watch jurors day and night to prevent, or catch, breaches of the order.

On the other hand, an outright ban on jurors' use of cellphones, iPads and laptops during a trial isn't going to endear jurors to the workings of the criminal justice system.

Both Crown prosecutors and defence counsel have in the past argued against removing jurors' cellular devices. Each side expressed the same fear -- that jury members will blame it for stripping them of their digital lifelines.

The risks posed by digital devices to an accused's right to a fair trial are many.

Jurors with smartphones and iPads have been known to Google definitions of legal terms. However, they may misunderstand what they're reading. Or, worse, they may rely on bogus legal information or non-Canadian law, both abundant on the Internet.

More worrisome still, they can access a universe of web pages of newspaper and electronic-media reports and skewed commentary about the very case they're hearing.

Jurors' motives in doing their own research are usually benign. But it's fundamentally wrong. They are supposed to decide cases solely on the evidence heard within the four walls of the courtroom.

There's growing anecdotal evidence that, despite judges' express directions to jurors to not do any independent research or investigate anyone involved in the case, they still Google the crime scene, accused, defence counsel, Crown prosecutor and even the judge.

The other risk is a juror will update his or her Facebook pages with untoward comments about a trial in progress, thus providing grounds for a mistrial. And now, with the advent and popularity of Twitter, jurors can even tweet reactions to unfolding evidence live from the jury box.

Late last year, the Canadian Centre for Court Technology, a non-profit corporation created by judicial, court-administration and legal-education organizations to promote courtroom use of technology, took the first step in addressing Canada's patchwork of provincial policies.

It issued proposed national guidelines that favoured liberal courtroom use of electronic devices by both media and spectators.

It largely demurred, however, to comment when it came to jurors. It recommended jurors be "not permitted to use electronic communication devices in the courtroom." But the guidelines did not address the prickly issue of the mechanics of enforcing that prohibition.

Contamination of the trial process by jurors accessing inadmissible evidence, misinformation or biased reporting, blogging and tweeting -- or even generating some of those -- is too easy, absent controls being in place.

The courts must move with the times. And it may be that hard and fast rules aren't the answer for an ever-evolving technology. But, at very least, a protocol of best practices should be put in place to help judges manage the risks.

The threats to a fair trial are just too obvious.


Douglas J. Johnston is a Winnipeg lawyer.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 19, 2013 A11

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Best of Jets sound bites following Saturday's 2-1 loss to Ducks

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A mother goose has chosen a rather busy spot to nest her eggs- in the parking lot of St Vital Centre on a boulevard. Countless cars buzz by and people have begun to bring it food.-Goose Challenge Day 06 - May 08, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • Aerial view of Portage and Main, The Esplanade Riel, Provencher Bridge over the Red River, The Canadian Museum for Human Rights and The Forks near the Assiniboine River, October 21st, 2011. (TREVOR HAGAN/WINNIPEG FREE PRESS) CMHR

View More Gallery Photos


Do you agree with the sale of the Canadian Wheat Board to foreign companies?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google