Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
McGovern's values came from an earlier, 'better' time
It's been 40 years since George McGovern lost his run for the U.S. presidency -- lost so badly as to become a figure of fun to entertainers, a cautionary example to practising politicians and, in myth at least, the creator of a movement known as "McGovernism," seen by many as wacky, weird and perhaps menacing. He deserved more respect than that, and fortunately he lived long enough to gain it.
Mr. McGovern was a product of some of this country's best traditions -- religious and political -- and also of a grinding economic Depression that shaped the ideas and behaviour of his generation. He was a patriot, a war hero and, as most who met or knew him would testify, a remarkably civil and pleasant man.
Mr. McGovern, who died Sunday at age 90, did not reinvent himself after his crushing defeat by President Richard M. Nixon in 1972. Just last year he published a book (What It Means to Be a Democrat) that restated some of the old McGovern themes but that was also surprisingly timely in the election season of 2012. "We Democrats believe people should be allowed to enjoy the fruits of their hard labour," he wrote, "but we know that a two-tiered economy, where CEOs rake in billions for laying off their fellow citizens, is neither fair nor sustainable."
He put much of his effort over the years into programs for feeding the hungry and alleviating poverty. Growing up during the Depression in South Dakota in a deeply religious family, he shared an awareness, common to many in that time, that good people could be brought low by economic forces beyond their understanding or control. Like many of his fading generation, he was a New Dealer to the end.
But the issue that animated his 1972 campaign was the war in Vietnam, to which the South Dakota senator became bitterly opposed. In 1970, during debate over a war-funding measure, he made one of the most extraordinary attacks ever heard on the Senate floor: "Every senator in this chamber is partly responsible for sending 50,000 young Americans to an early grave," he said. "This chamber reeks of blood. Every senator here is partly responsible for that human wreckage at Walter Reed and Bethesda Naval and all across our land -- young men without legs, or arms, or genitals, or faces or hopes."
This could be seen as a political statement, of course. George McGovern was ambitious for the presidency, and the antiwar forces were strong. But he had also been a decorated Second World War bomber pilot and had an intimate acquaintance with what pilots and crews suffered in that high-mortality business. Mr. McGovern came through it as a calm, respected and steadfast leader who carried his crews through some truly hair-raising episodes.
Mr. McGovern proved to be a better moral exemplar than presidential candidate. His economic program seemed naive to much of the country, and his end-the-war-now message extreme. His most egregious mistake was his handling of the Democratic choice for vice-president, when he dropped Thomas Eagleton after it was learned the Missouri senator had undergone treatment for depression. But the greatest damage to his campaign probably came from the excesses of a sizable part of his antiwar constituency, which imposed on the campaign an image that belied its candidate and his beliefs.
Reflecting on 1972, Mr. McGovern once said, "You know, sometimes, when they say you're ahead of your time, it's just a polite way of saying you have a real bad sense of timing." In fact, Mr. McGovern's virtues stemmed from an earlier time, and to his sense that it was, in some important ways, a better one.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 23, 2012 A11
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 32 articles for this week)
The number of words MPs speak in House counts
1:00 AM 0As a measure of gauging the volume or quality of work of Canada's members of Parliament, a series of calculations ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- How to humble wing nuts
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- When Harper spoke, it was wise to listen
- Japan's PM risks bankruptcy
- The number of words MPs speak in House counts
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Canada's super energy potential
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- How to humble wing nuts
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Housing homeless tackled
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Why we assume the worst
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Female chiefs needed
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.