Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
NDP should raise tax, get out of the way
A few years ago I was invited to speak to the Winnipeg Chamber of Commerce and used the opportunity to talk about provincial infrastructure in the context of how we tackle big public-policy issues.
I made note of the fact that as a province everyone seems to agree -- on all fronts -- that we are falling further and further behind in fixing the things that need to be fixed. Furthermore, that we all want the fixes to happen.
This is actually an excellent starting point -- to have virtually everyone seeing the same problem and agreeing it needs to be solved.
The big sticking point seems to be on how this issue should be paid for.
I argued the provincial government should add two points to the provincial sales tax in order to establish an aggressive infrastructure program and to accelerate the process.
At the end of my address, I was shocked to receive a standing ovation from the audience.
My call, however, wasn't just for a tax increase. It was based on the idea the increase would be designated specifically as an infrastructure levy such that the proceeds of the tax could be transparently traced both on the way into government as well as how, when and where it went out.
It was also premised on the condition the special levy would have a sunset clause such that the tax would automatically end after a specified period of time unless the provincial legislature, on the basis of a super-majority vote, decided to extend the levy.
In other words, the government of the day alone couldn't continue the tax without the support of the opposition parties. The possibility of a referendum in this regard was also raised as a means of allowing Manitobans at large to make the decision.
Finally, the idea was that an independent infrastructure commission be established to receive the new money, determine the list of infrastructure projects to be undertaken, allocate money according to the priority of those jobs and report quarterly to Manitobans on its progress.
It seems after a few more years slipping by and further degradation of our provincial capital assets and infrastructure, the coalition of supporters for an increased sales tax is growing.
Joining the business community now is the Manitoba Federation of Labour, and this ought to be a clear signal to government that the people at large want something done.
Taxpayer advocates argue the government has plenty of money to accomplish the infrastructure fix if it only spent its revenue more wisely.
This may very well be a legitimate perspective. But the reality is this government seems content with the way it's currently operating and it is going to be the government for the next three years or so.
In other words, it's unlikely the government is going to suddenly quit spending approximately $200 million where it's already been allocated to various activities and shift that money to infrastructure.
We can't afford to wait to see if Manitobans decide to change the government in the next election to start tackling a problem that gets worse by the day.
What we need to do is keep prodding Premier Greg Selinger to take a bold step.
It's always risky for a government to raise taxes. I'm astonished that I find myself in agreement with the very idea of tax increases.
But at some point we have to collectively decide either we want infrastructure fixed in a comprehensive way or, if not, then we have to stop griping about it and suffer the consequences.
I want it fixed, and like it or not, we have to pay for it. The levy I and others including this newspaper are proposing is a consumption rather than an income tax which, at least for discretionary spending, allows taxpayers to effectively choose whether to make a purchase or not and pay the tax.
Taxpayers would also feel a lot better about doing this if such a plan also included the transparency and accountability I suggested at the chamber of commerce because we'd have the certainty of knowing the dollars are being spent for their intended purpose and not disappearing into general revenues.
I'd like to add my voice to the messages the premier is getting: It's action time, and while there will be the usual grumbling, this is when Manitoba requires a bold initiative.
David Asper is a Winnipeg businessman and a professor of law at the University of Manitoba.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition June 2, 2012 A18
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 33 articles for this week)
Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
1:00 AM 0It was the best of opportunities. It was the worst of nightmares.
Let's go back in time to when the Manitoba ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Electronic footprints in a Google age
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Iran’s president-elect a glimmer of hope
- Firm sues governments over intellectual property
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Elijah Harper changed my world
- That will be $90,000 down, please
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Erdogan — a Chavez-style strongman who gets results
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.