Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Obama's ad a brilliant political pivot
The Obama ad attacking Mitt Romney's record at Bain Capital was a shameless exaggeration but a brilliant political pivot. Instead of running on his record -- where he is vulnerable -- the president is making character the issue.
President Barack Obama promised a lot when he ran for president -- to fix the trade deficits with China and on oil, which together steal some five million jobs, curb the excesses at Wall Street banks, and curb escalating health-care costs.
In perfectly choreographed fashion, the Bain ad characterized Romney as someone who bought up healthy businesses, loaded them with debt and then drove them into bankruptcy -- destroying jobs to enrich his private equity partners.
Cory Booker, Democratic mayor of Newark, made headlines calling the ad "nauseating to the American public" and that gave Obama the perfect opportunity to attack Romney oh so effectively.
The president strongly defended the ad, stating Mitt Romney is running on his experience at Bain, not his record as governor of Massachusetts.
Then Obama took the opportunity to say a president can't just worry about making a profit but rather whether the country is investing in jobs today and in the future, cutting-edge technology and a fairer tax system.
The president brilliantly drew the contrast between his public career and Romney's private pursuit of profit -- that's where he wants voters' attention.
Most voters didn't see, and certainly won't remember, the details of the Bain ad, but they will remember Obama's goals -- creating jobs, reorienting the economy and economic justice -- and how Romney allegedly made his fortune -- buying, borrowing and burying jobs.
The facts are that in the three years since Obama became president, the trade deficit is up 40 per cent, JPMorgan and other big banks are still running their Manhattan casinos and health-care costs keep rocketing.
It's a lousy economy full of injustice, and Obama can't easily claim to have made things better.
For several days the press coverage will remain focused on the Bain ad and private equity, Obama's goals and Romney's character, and not on the incumbent's record and the challenger's solutions.
This is quite similar to the tactic employed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. Each time bipartisan consensus is reached to find money for a policy priority, like extending low-interest student loans, he offers a bill to raise taxes on high-income Americans.
Reid knows Republicans will block such class warfare, and the president can then crow that he stands up for ordinary folk while Republicans stand up for the wealthy.
Yet, Romney is to blame for not turning the debate to the economy and his solutions. He has criticized the president's record but not with the showmanship and skill of the Obama-to-Booker- to-Obama triple play.
Mayor Booker played the shill so well -- he deserves an Academy Award for best supporting actor.
More importantly, Romney by focusing on his private-sector experience is not effectively explaining how his solutions on China, energy, banking, and health-care will work, make a difference and create jobs.
Sadly, with each passing day, Romney looks like another hopeful from Massachusetts -- John Kerry.
Both dress up well, but under the intense lights of a national campaign, they are easily outwitted by a wily incumbent.
Peter Morici is an economist and professor at the Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, and widely published columnist.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 25, 2012 A12
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 9 articles for today)
What is Struthers afraid of?
1:00 AM 0The Selinger government has tabled Bill 43 to reconcile law governing two previously independent but now merged cash cows -- ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- A pollster's shame...
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Glimmers of hope for Pakistan
- Nice guys finish second
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- White House witch hunts for whistle blowers an embarrassment
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- A sad twist in the path that the corner store was on
- Manitobans want thrift, not PST hike
- Making NRC tool of industry bad for science
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Internet becoming a jungle
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Fisher could have been paid $16,000 for his 'wasted fish'
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Happy not-mother's days
- Internet becoming a jungle
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- Early childhood education overrated
- The Big Pitcher
- Canada and the Arctic Council
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Mother Nature springs into action
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.