Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Pat that butt, win that game
People don't touch each other enough, research shows, but male athlete subcultures are a prominent exception. Ongoing studies confirm interpersonal touching among members of amateur or professional sports teams is rampant, and the benefits are extraordinary.
"Tactile communication, or physical touching, promotes co-operation between people, communicates distinct emotions, soothes in time of stress and is used to make inferences of warmth and trust," reports a team of University of California researchers. "Physical touch increases both individual and group performance."
According to Michael Kraus, Dacher Keltner and their University of California colleagues, athletes who touch their teammates most often and for longer periods of time have the best athletic performances and their teams tend to be most successful.
"Good teams are touchier than bad teams," the research team confirmed. "Touchiest players usually excel; touchier basketball players manage the ball better."
According to James Coan at the University of Virginia "supportive touching'' distributes initiative better and promotes collective achievement.
Touching among athletes takes many forms: fist-bumping, leaping shoulder-bumping, hugging, high-fives and butt-patting.
The University of California researchers report "The most touch-bonded teams are the most successful teams,'' and regularly have the most successful competition seasons.
"Touch predicts improved performance,'' the researchers confirmed. "Co-operative behaviour between teammates explained the association between touch and performance, and the presence of group touching is inseparable from group co-operation.''
A 2004 study by Linda Kneidinger at Temple University and her colleagues showed that among baseball players, females touched teammates more often than males, especially after negative team events. Males touched each other more often during "away" games rather than during home games.
"Touch involves an invasion of personal space, but (in sports) it is often well-received,'' the researchers reported. "Outside narrow limits, bodily contact can be unacceptable.''
Smith's team says touching has been identified as being very important to humans.
Touching has significant therapeutic value.
According to Kathryn Barnett at Texas Women's University, health-care professionals regularly use touching as therapy in a variety of medical situations, most notably in pediatrics and maternity matters. One study showed eight out of every 10 patients at a clinic were touched regularly on the hands and shoulders, and the touch had therapeutic results.
A study by Tria O'Maille and Rosiann Kasayka showed touch therapy boosts sensory awareness.
"Touching improves the clinical course of several conditions, including growth and development of preterm infants, reducing pain, increasing attentiveness, diminishing depression and enhancing immune function,'' they found.
If interpersonal touching is so beneficial, one might wonder why it is not more widespread in North American society.
Psychologists suggest that is because North Americans discourage touching. A 1978 study by Nan Sussman and H.M. Rosenfeld indicated males consider male-male touching to be an intrusion, although women do not dislike female-female touching.
"Observations among (North American) adults have revealed rates of touching far below that of many European and Latin American countries,'' Smith's team says.
Cultural phobias dictate touching prevalence, according to a new study by Darius Dolinsky at the Warsaw School of Social Sciences. In North America, men dislike being touched by men whereas women dislike being touched by strangers.
The main exceptions to the general anti-touching mindset are: sports, dancing, games, crowds, greetings and partings and medical treatments.
Meanwhile, a University of California study shows warm touching generates oxytocin, a hormone that creates feelings of trust.
Robert Alison has a doctorate in zoology and is based in Victoria, B.C.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 14, 2010 A12
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 35 articles for this week)
This summer, check out health care elsewhere
1:00 AM 0For many Canadians, the Victoria Day long weekend marks the beginning of summertime holiday planning, if not a late-May escape ...
View Related
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Clothing sellers should unite on Bangladesh
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- This summer, check out health care elsewhere
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- ‘Signs’ of hope, little more, in Greece
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- How to make another bad winter for honeybees better
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- Why we assume the worst
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.