Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Socking it away as Canada ages

No retirement crisis in Canada

  • Print

VANCOUVER -- Today's meeting of federal and provincial finance ministers will touch on a politically charged debate about expanding the Canada Pension Plan (CPP). Proponents have tried to convince Canadians they are not saving sufficiently for retirement, with some even suggesting we are on the brink of a retirement crisis.

These views simply do not reconcile with the available empirical evidence. Thankfully, there's no retirement crisis in Canada.

Related Items

It's important to clarify how we should think about retirement adequacy before determining whether a problem exists. Indeed, measuring the adequacy of Canada's retirement system can be complicated by divergent definitions and how different sources of income are accounted for.

The income level in retirement needed to maintain living standards is typically lower than one's pre-retirement income. The reasons are complex and precise replacement rates depend on individual circumstances and pre-retirement earnings. Income replacement rates can be as low as 50 to 60 per cent, but the rule of thumb among financial planners is between 70 and 80 per cent.

People can maintain their consumption in retirement with less income partly because they spend less on commuting, raising children, and work-related expenses. Certain taxes also fall in retirement years (e.g., payroll taxes). An analysis of adequate replacement rates must therefore reflect these realities.

Canada's retirement system is generally achieving adequate replacement rates. That was the conclusion from an extensive probe the federal and provincial finance ministers commissioned back in 2009. The report found: "Overall, the Canadian retirement-income system is performing well, providing Canadians with an adequate standard of living upon retirement."

Canada's retirement system consists of three main pillars: government income-support programs such as Old Age Security and Guaranteed Income Supplement, which are paid to eligible seniors regardless of their employment history (pillar 1), the CPP (or QPP in Quebec), which is a government-administered pension based on contributions from one's employment (pillar 2), and other savings, including registered pension plans, RRSPs, and tax-free savings accounts (pillar 3).

Thanks in large part to a generous pillar 1, eligible low-income seniors experience relatively high replacement rates of income in retirement, partly explaining why Canada has one of the lowest rates of senior poverty in the developed world. Let's be clear: Expanding the CPP won't help low-income seniors over a replacement-rate hurdle.

To the extent that other Canadians are deemed to have lower-than-desired replacement rates, a key problem is the failure to take a comprehensive view of the resources available to them in retirement. Failing to do so overlooks large forms of savings such as real estate, equity in a business, and financial assets held outside tax-preferred accounts. Critically, these assets can help supplement income as people downsize their family home, collect investment-property income or sell their businesses.

Data from the federal Finance Department show real estate assets (net of mortgages) and other non-financial and financial assets (less consumer debt) account for more than two-thirds of the aggregate assets held by Canadians. Any analysis that ignores these assets misses the lion's share of Canadians' savings.

A recent Statistics Canada study that accounted for the potential income Canadians could derive from such assets found senior-led households are actually better off than those headed by younger adults. And calculations by actuary Fred Vettese suggest virtually all Canadian households will achieve adequate replacement rates when these assets are considered. Canadians are clearly more prudent and prepared for retirement than "bigger CPP" advocates give them credit for.

However, to the extent that a small group of Canadians with modest incomes have inadequate retirement income, more research is required to better understand who these individuals are and the factors that contribute to their circumstances. But expanding the CPP is a blunt instrument that would affect all working Canadians. It would be illogical to impose a compulsory increase to the CPP when the current retirement-income system is serving the great majority.

What problem is CPP proponents trying to fix? The current mix of public programs, employment-based pensions, tax benefits for private savings, and other assets appear to be helping the vast majority of Canadians achieve reasonable living standards in retirement. To the extent that certain cohorts may be saving inadequately, the policy debate should be about targeted measures to address the problem -- not a one-size-fits-all reform.

Finance ministers should consult the available evidence, which does not support claims of a retirement crisis. They should exercise caution and resist pressure to act.


Charles Lammam is resident scholar in economic policy and Sean Speer is the associate director of fiscal studies at the Fraser Institute.


Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 16, 2013 A9

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.


Make text: Larger | Smaller


Kenney commends McDonald's on taking action on foreign worker controversy

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • A young goose   reaches for long strands of grass Friday night near McGillvary Blvd-See Bryksa 30 Day goose challenge- Day 19 - May 23, 2012   (JOE BRYKSA / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS)
  • Marc Gallant/Winnipeg Free Press. Local/Standup- BABY BISON. Fort Whyte Centre's newest mother gently nudges her 50 pound, female bull calf awake. Calf born yesterday. 25 now in herd. Four more calfs are expected over the next four weeks. It is the bison's second calf. June 7, 2002.

View More Gallery Photos


Do you support a proposed ban on tanning beds for youth under 18?

View Results

Ads by Google