Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
South Africa's black cloud
Julius Malema did something unusual last week. The leader of the Youth League of South Africa's ruling African National Congress (ANC) apologized for something he had said. "We are a young people who will time and again commit mistakes and are prepared to learn from those mistakes," he declared.
There were only three things wrong with his apology. One was the use of the "royal We": It was Malema himself who said the ANC should work to overthrow the government of neighbouring Botswana, not some anonymous group of youths. Secondly, he is not actually a youth, he is 30 years old. And thirdly, his remark was clearly premeditated and he is not really sorry for making it.
Julius Malema is increasingly seen as a likely future president of South Africa: President Jacob Zuma has said that he is a good leader who is "worthy of inheriting the ANC." But this doesn't necessarily mean that Zuma really likes Malema. Most of the ANC's leaders dislike him, but they also fear him, for he has the enthusiastic support of millions of the poorest people in South Africa.
The ANC's goal was to bring power and prosperity to South Africa's black majority, but it has only half-succeeded. Seventeen years after it took power, one-third of the country's people are still living on less than $2 a day, and they are almost all black.
So there is a promising political niche for somebody who articulates their anger and advocates radical solutions, and Malema has won the competition to fill that niche.
He won it by being more radical than anybody else. He's the only prominent member of the ANC who has scolded the president for not being sufficiently supportive of Robert Mugabe, the octogenarian dictator who has reduced neighbouring Zimbabwe to penury. He advocates nationalizing South Africa's mining industry (by far the country's biggest source of employment and revenue), and seizing the land of white farmers without compensation.
He insists on singing Shoot the Boer (the white farmer), the old apartheid-era "struggle" song, despite South Africa's laws against hate speech and the fact that 1,489 white farmers actually have been murdered since the end of the apartheid regime in 1994.
So the poorest and most marginalized people in the country love Malema for his ferocity and recklessness, and that gives him enormous leverage within the party.
Only once before has the ANC tried to discipline him, in May 2010, when he was forced to make a public apology, fined and ordered to take anger-management classes after he "brought the party into disrepute" by criticising President Zuma. But he didn't attend the anger-management course and before long he was back at it.
After his latest outburst, calling for regime change in Botswana, which he said was "a foot-stool of imperialism, a security threat to Africa and always under constant puppetry of the United States," ANC leaders called again for him to be disciplined, but it didn't happen. Malema made a semi-apology ("We should have known better"), but he did not abandon his plan to use ANC Youth League resources to support the opposition in Botswana.
Neither did he repudiate his call for the nationalization of the mines, and the ANC is so afraid of him that it has said nationalization "requires further study" -- even though the party leaders know that it would cause the collapse of the South African economy.
Does Malema understand that? Perhaps not: He only finished high school at the age of 21, with near-failing grades. But since his whole political strategy requires him to be a raving extremist, he would probably still be arguing for the same measures even if he understood their consequences. Perhaps the heavens would fall if he got power, but so what? He would be in power, and that's what counts.
So could this reckless, ruthless demagogue end up as the elected leader of South Africa? Yes he could, and that would be the end of the brave experiment in tolerance and democracy that South Africa has been living through for the past two decades. But it depends on two things: How well the economy is doing, and how badly the ANC is doing in the opinion polls.
The two things are clearly linked: The better South Africa's economy is, the more popular the ANC will be. An ANC that is not afraid of losing power in the next election would never give Malema a chance to take power.
But an ANC that foresees itself losing power in the next election -- and after 17 continuous years in power, its popularity is eroding fast -- might well turn to Malema in the hope of turning its political fortunes around. That's unlikely to happen in the next general election in 2014, but by the one after that it could be a real possibility.
Gwynne Dyer is a London-based independent journalist.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 18, 2011 A10
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 28 articles for this week)
Elijah Harper changed my world
06/17/2013 2:31 PM 0WESTBANK, B.C. — When Elijah Harper passed away on May 17, 2013 I felt as though an arrow had pierced ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Best of bad odds in Syria
- That will be $90,000 down, please
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Elijah Harper changed my world
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- What might it be like when pot is legal?
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Work, not retirement, saves lives
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Erdogan — a Chavez-style strongman who gets results
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Anti-GM foods activist sees the science -- and the light
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Power exercised in secret is most easily abused
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.