Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Stigma often lingers for innocent accused

  • Print

Last month in Thompson provincial court the Crown quietly dropped charges of fraud, forgery, uttering a forged document and mail theft against the mayor of Leaf Rapids. Crown attorney David Gray directed a stay of proceedings on all 28 offences alleged to have been committed by Geraldine Cockerill, who is also Leaf Rapids' former Canada Post postmaster.

Cockerill maintains she was wrongly accused, and ruined in the result. "I lost everything being falsely accused of these charges."

Canada Post fired her when the charges surfaced. She also lost her pension and benefits.

The Crown offered no explanation for abandoning the prosecution, saying only charges were dropped "for a fairly technical reason."

Her experience isn't singular. As Supreme Court of Canada Justice Michael Moldaver once put it: "Sometimes the person most victimized by the criminal process is the accused."

The horrendous impact the laying of a criminal charge can have on an innocent person's life plays out routinely in the justice system, though with a lot less notoriety than the dramatic stories of the wrongly convicted.

The names David Milgaard, Donald Marshall, Jr., Thomas Sophonow, Guy Paul Morin, James Driskell and Steven Truscott are synonymous with miscarriage of justice -- but after trial and conviction. There's no comparable celebrity roster of those charged, branded criminal and dragged through the system, only to see the Crown ultimately abandon their prosecution.

The withdrawal of a criminal charge is, at first blush, seemingly great for an accused -- particularly where the charge is dropped before a trial begins.

However, a stay is usually accompanied by no, or minimal, explanation.

Occasionally a Crown attorney indicates why critical evidence isn't available, or isn't admissible in a court of law, in dropping charges. But disclosure is the exception. Rarer yet is a statement from the prosecutor that amounts to exonerating an accused.

At least in part for these reasons, the stigma of criminal accusation sometimes lingers. And lingers for a long time.

Professionals can have careers and reputations destroyed by mere allegations of workplace criminal conduct. Those whose vocations involve dealing with children are particularly vulnerable. Allegations of physical abuse or sexual misconduct, particularly if it involves a minor, are often ruinous.

And where police issue press releases announcing the laying of charges, the accusations receive widespread conventional media coverage and also, nowadays, a great deal of play online and via social media. Much of the latter is frequently neither fair nor fully informed.

That's why sometimes an innocent accused, following the staying of a charge, simply moves to a province or country where his or her name and face aren't known.

Moreover, as with Cockerill's case, an accusation can lead to job loss and financial ruin. Legal costs to fight charges can be staggering. Defending yourself against multiple charges such as the mayor faced can deplete life savings or involve a debt load that may never be retired.

Cockerill says she's considering a civil suit against Canada Post and the Province of Manitoba for their bungled handling of the allegations against her. She maintains she was "falsely accused by a co-worker who was after my job and wanted me fired."

Once upon a time suing the Crown or a Crown agency like Canada Post was impossible. The Crown used to enjoy an immunity from prosecution -- you couldn't sue the state, its agents or officials. However, it's now possible to sue the government. But legally, it's still a tough row to hoe.

In the absence of malice, or gross negligence in the crime investigation, police aren't generally liable. Crown prosecutors, absent definitive proof of malice, can't be held civilly liable for prosecuting an innocent accused.

Still, the fallibility of the criminal justice system, and the disastrous consequences of that fallibility, has made Canadian courts increasingly open to compensating innocent accused. There have been several cases over the last decade where courts have found prosecutions, in the scathing words of one Alberta judge, "cloaked with malice," and made huge damage awards to the wrongfully accused.

Leaf Rapids' mayor wasn't a victim of crime in the classic sense. But she has the option of trying to prove victimization of a different sort in our civil courts.

It will be interesting to see if she picks up that option.

 

Douglas J. Johnston is a Winnipeg lawyer.

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 5, 2014 A13

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

O'Shea says the team is going to stick to the plan after first loss

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • Marc Gallant / Winnipeg Free Press.  Local/Weather Standup- Catching rays. Prairie Dog stretches out at Fort Whyte Centre. Fort Whyte has a Prairie Dog enclosure with aprox. 20 dogs young and old. 060607.
  • KEN GIGLIOTTI / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS / Jan 10  2011 ‚Äì WEB STDUP ‚Äì Frosty morning at -15 degrees C , in pic frost covers the the Nellie McClung statue  on the MB Legislature grounds at 7am

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Which of Manitoba's new landlord-tenant rules are you looking forward to most?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google