16°c Clear
28°c Isolated showers
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
The decline of the West?
The rise of the East might be more worrying if it was monolithic
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS ARCHIVES Chinese naval vessels, part of an expanding military fuelled by economic growth, are symbols of a power shift, not a fact of it. (CP)
You know the storyline by now. There are one million millionaires in China. ("To get rich is glorious," said former leader Deng Xiaoping.) Seventy per cent of the homes in China are bought for cash. China's total trade -- the sum of imports and exports -- is now bigger than that of the United States. "They're going to eat our lunch," whimper the faint-hearted in the West.
It's not just the Chinese who are coming. The Indians and the Brazilians are coming, too, with economic-growth rates far higher than in the old industrialized countries, but it doesn't even stop there. There's also Mexico, Turkey, Indonesia and half a dozen other big countries in what used to be called the Third World that have discovered the secret of high-speed growth. The power shift is happening even faster than the pundits predicted.
As recently as 2009, the "BRICs" (Brazil, Russia, India and China) accounted for less than one-tenth of total global consumption. The European Union consumed twice as much, and so did the United States. But by 2020, the BRICs will be producing and consuming just as much as either of the older economic zones, and by 2025, considerably more than either of them.
In fact, if you include not just the four BRICs but all the other fast-growing economies of the ex-Third World, in just a dozen years' time they will account for about 40 per cent of world consumption. As a rule, with wealth comes power, so they will increasingly be calling the tune the West must dance to. Or at least that is the doomsday scenario that haunts the strategists and economists of the West. It's nonsense, for at least three reasons.
First of all, a shift in the world's centre of economic gravity does not necessarily spell doom for those whose relative influence has dwindled. The last time the centre shifted, when the United States overtook the nations of Europe in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, it did not dent Europe's prosperity at all.
It's true that by the latter half of the 20th century, there were American troops all over Western Europe, but that would not have happened if Europe had not come close to destroying itself in the two world wars (which can be seen as a European civil war in two parts). In any case, the U.S. troops have mostly gone home now, and Europeans live at least as well as Americans.
Secondly, the new centre of gravity this time, while mostly located in Asia, is not a single country with a coherent foreign policy such as the United States. The four BRICs will never become a strategic or economic bloc. They are more likely to split into rival blocs, although one hopes not. And the Mexicos and Turkeys and Indonesias of this new world will have their own fish to fry.
So it will be a more complicated world with many major players, and the centre of economic gravity will be in Asia, but there's nothing particularly strange about this. More than half of the human race lives in Asia, so where else should the centre of gravity be? Asia is very far from monolithic, and there is no logical reason to suppose its economic rise spells economic decline for the West.
Thirdly, descriptions of the future that are simply extrapolations of the present, such as the ones at the start of this article, are almost always wrong. If the widely believed forecasts of the 1980s had been right, Japan would now bestride the world like an economic Colossus. The one certain thing about the future is surprises -- but some surprises are a little less surprising than others.
Take climate change, for example. The scientific evidence strongly suggests the tropical and subtropical parts of the world, home to almost all of the emerging economic powers, will be much harder hit by global warming than the temperate parts of the globe, farther away from the equator, where the older industrialized countries all live.
There is already much anger about this in the new economic powers. Eighty per cent of the greenhouse gases of human origin in the atmosphere were put there by the old-rich countries, who got rich by burning fossil fuels for the past two centuries, and yet they get off lightly while the (relatively) innocent suffer. But even if the newly rich wanted revenge, they are too disunited -- and will be too busy coping with the warming -- to do much about it.
The centre of gravity of the world economy is undoubtedly leaving the old "Atlantic" world of Europe and North America and moving toward Asia, but how far and how fast this process goes remains to be seen. And there is no reason to believe it will leave the countries of the West poor or helpless.
True, economists in the West often ask the question: "What will we sell the emerging countries in the future that they cannot produce for themselves?" In the runaway-global-warming scenario, the answer would be "food," but the real answer is sure to be more complex than that. Never mind. They'll think of something, because they'll have to.
Gwynne Dyer is an independent journalist whose articles are published in 45 countries.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 21, 2013 A15
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 33 articles for this week)
Don't let flood-evacuee problems kill the vision
1:00 AM 0It was the best of opportunities. It was the worst of nightmares.
Let's go back in time to when the Manitoba ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Electronic footprints in a Google age
- Pimachiowin Aki is exceptional heritage
- Iran’s president-elect a glimmer of hope
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Firm sues governments over intellectual property
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Elijah Harper changed my world
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- That will be $90,000 down, please
- Too rural, too white, too male
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Beauty and the (mortgage) Beast
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Expense scandal dogs Nova Scotia's fading NDP government
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Appalling rates of public-sector absenteeism must be addressed
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Key of Bart: Video Killed The Mayor Who Hates The Toronto Star
- Too rural, too white, too male
- A sorry fact -- Katz finds it hard to apologize
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- The key of Bart
- Ford can't resign as mayor soon enough
- Obama gets ‘revenge’ with Rice appointment
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- UNESCO's concerns unrelated to Bipole III
- Shed more light on JTF2 secrets
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- The view of Bipole III from Hart Mountain
- Erdogan — a Chavez-style strongman who gets results
- Aging makes women proud — and loud
- Was east side misled by NDP government?
- Quebec's nationalism run amok
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- No bailouts required for Pollock's
- Teachers should fast-track inclusive plan
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba Hydro's halcyon days are gone
- Hydro must serve citizens, not government
- Shocking exclusion
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Gadgets in classrooms are gimmicks
- ‘Stand your ground’ case not what it seemed
- Hydro plans will be scrutinized in public
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.