Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

The evidence is anecdotal, your honour

  • Print

Just two months into the new year and questions being asked by justice-watchers everywhere include: Is our judiciary out of touch with Canadians? On the flip side, does Joe Citizen just not get it?

Last month, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney spoke on behalf of those who resent our court's kid-glove handling of foreign criminals who take gross advantage of seemingly easy entry into our country. In doing so, Kenney took a swipe at those judges who "...on a whim, or perhaps in a fit of misguided magnanimity... overturn the careful decisions of multiple levels of diligent, highly trained public servants, tribunals, and even other judges."

That brought a strong rebuke from the Canadian Bar Association's Rod Snow, who howled that political criticism of judicial figures was an "affront to our democracy and freedoms" that "undermine(s) confidence in the judiciary."

Last week in Winnipeg, it was pretty clear that Justice Robert Dewar undermined the confidence of some with his thoughts and a decidedly genteel sentence for a sexual assault. An unscientific poll conducted by the Free Press showed that thousands of infuriated readers believed a judicial sanction was in order and several official complaints have been launched.

While all three political parties entered the dissing fray at the provincial or federal levels, the Canadian bar this time remained mute and apparently unconcerned about the political slagging of a judicial figure.

Elsewhere, a new B.C. case has left a bad taste about the sometimes-unfulfilled role of the judiciary in community safety.

Prince George is a B.C. town in crisis and dubbed one of the worst in the West for its crime problems. An influx of gangs and narcotics has migrated from Vancouver and taken firm hold of the public psyche in this smallish city of 77,000. Murders, beatings and kids buying crack cocaine are too routine. Reports of fingers being hacked off due to drug debts add to the anguish.

In January, Prince George's city council received its formal report from a recent gang crime summit.

Identifying children at risk, early intervention, addiction treatment, education and media co-operation were shown as key to an integrated approach for challenging the gang threat. In short, all the "right" things were on the table and everyone, from city hall to the police through to the schools and the Ministry of Children and Family Development was on board.

But what about the judiciary?

What about the case of Dwayne William Caron? The RCMP hit the motherlode when he was pulled over for speeding.

Caron had been zipping along at about 165 km/h en route from Vancouver to Prince George. There was a short chase before Caron pulled over. The officer checked the glovebox for the car's registration while Caron sat securely in the back of the police car. While doing so, the constable happened upon a digital camera that he scrolled through, looking for possible evidence of the speeds Caron had been travelling. (Bad guys do sometimes take pictures of their crimes.)

And this was no exception.

Except the photos were of a gun being fired by Caron. A search of the vehicle located a loaded nine-millimetre and a bunch of cash. Thirty bundles -- $2,000 each. An ion scan later detected cocaine and methamphetamine on the loot.

It was strong evidence of organized crime and strong supporting evidence of the kind of trouble Prince George faces daily as an illicit profit centre.

A court found Caron guilty on a variety of charges. That didn't last. On the heels of the city's gang summit and all of Prince George's best intentions, an Appeal Court overturned the conviction, saying that looking at the digital camera was, "...more than a minimal interference with Mr. Caron's right to privacy." Furthermore, "the price paid by society for an acquittal ... is outweighed by the importance of maintaining Charter standards."

But do such standards go beyond the standards Prince George needs in its fight to regain normalcy? Do ever-fluid Charter standards mesh with modern Canadian values?

All the cop did was look at a camera -- after a 160 km/h chase.

Adding insult to injury, Caron did not qualify for legal aid, so the lower court that convicted him gave the okey dokey to pay his defence team with the forfeited, cocaine-stained cash.

The judiciary's responsibility goes beyond protecting the rights of those individuals accused of crimes. It has a duty of balance and to fair community protection. That responsibility is great because it is the last word.

There are strong arguments to say that the judiciary works well and concerns about immigration, sexual assault and organized crime may be more anecdotal than truly indicative.

It's just that there are so damn many anecdotes.

 

Robert Marshall is a former

Winnipeg police detective.

rm112800@hotmail.com

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition March 5, 2011 H11

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

letters

Make text: Larger | Smaller

LATEST VIDEO

Winnipeg Cheapskate: Cheap summer weekends

View more like this

Photo Store Gallery

  • MIKE DEAL / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS 060711 Chris Pedersen breeds Monarch butterflies in his back yard in East Selkirk watching as it transforms from the Larva or caterpillar through the Chrysalis stage to an adult Monarch. Here an adult Monarch within an hour of it emerging from the Chrysalis which can be seen underneath it.
  • Carolyn Kavanagh(10) had this large dragonfly land on her while spending time at Winnetka Lake, Ontario. photo by Andrea Kavanagh (mom0 show us your summer winnipeg free press

View More Gallery Photos

Poll

Will you miss Grandma Elm?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google