Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Time for Obama to approve the XL pipeline
Environmentalists who are against building the Keystone XL oil pipeline from Alberta to the U.S. Gulf Coast, have called a march on Washington this weekend to demand President Barack Obama again reject it.
This time, it is the opponents the president should turn down. He should move to get the 2,736-kilometre, $7-billion underground pipeline approved within the next couple of months.
When Obama denied a permit for Keystone XL in January, it was because the builder, TransCanada Corp., needed to revise the route to avoid Nebraska's Sandhills region overlying the Ogallala Aquifer.
Rather than wait for this essential revision, Republicans in Congress forced the president to make a quick decision on TransCanada's entire application in the hope his rejecting it would hurt him in the election.
Since then, the company has rerouted the pipeline and in May submitted a new application to the State Department, which is involved because the pipeline would cross the U.S.-Canada border. Environmental studies have been updated accordingly on what was already one of the most researched infrastructure projects in U.S. history. Now Obama has won re-election, removing any need to pretend the pipeline's surpassing value to U.S. energy security is undermined by its environmental risks.
The pipeline itself would be at least as safe as any of the thousands of kilometres of pipelines that carry crude oil, liquefied petroleum gases and natural gas across the U.S. But then opponents don't really object to the pipeline itself. What they want is to slow or stop altogether exploitation of the Athabascan oilsands in Alberta.
It's true that extracting and refining bitumen from the sticky black sands emits significantly more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases than does drilling and processing ordinary oil. Yet in the well-to-wheels life cycle of the oil, its emissions are only about 17 per cent greater (or even less) because most of oil's emissions come from use. What's more, oilsands producers are working to reduce per-barrel emissions, for example by generating electricity as a byproduct of oil extraction.
In September, Royal Dutch Shell announced it would begin carbon capture and storage at the oilsands by 2015.
The environmental side-effects are real, in other words, but acceptable with careful monitoring and continued efforts to minimize them. Consider that Canada is the United States' biggest and most reliable seller of crude and that the Athabascan oilsands are the third-largest proven oil reserves on Earth, already producing about two million barrels a day and expected to supply 3.3 million by 2020. That's enough to help make North America largely energy-independent.
The Keystone XL pipeline would carry 700,000 barrels of oil a day to refineries in Oklahoma and Texas. Not building it would keep the fuel from reaching the U.S., but it wouldn't shut down oilsands extraction altogether.
TransCanada can be expected to push back hard against efforts in Canada to block the construction of the so-called Gateway Pipeline, which would carry bitumen from the oilsands west to British Columbia, where it could be loaded on tanker ships bound for China.
The bitumen is coming out of the ground one way or another. Obama should ensure it goes to the U.S. and not the Far East. The administration has long said it would make a decision by the first quarter of 2013. We see no reason it shouldn't do so before the end of the year.
-- Bloomberg News
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition November 15, 2012 A16
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 31 articles for this week)
'Fried chicken' is no more a joke than the N-word
1:00 AM 0When I heard that a golfer had made a "joke" about Tiger Woods and fried chicken, I had to double-check ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- How to humble wing nuts
- When Harper spoke, it was wise to listen
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- The number of words MPs speak in House counts
- Japan's PM risks bankruptcy
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Never take candy from a stranger
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- How to humble wing nuts
- Housing homeless tackled
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- How to humble wing nuts
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Housing homeless tackled
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Female chiefs needed
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.