Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 04/6/2013 3:19 AM | Comments: 0
In 1885, the Home Insurance Building in Chicago opened its doors. At 10 storeys, it was the world's first skyscraper, and the first building to use a steel frame in its construction. Since then, the use of steel and concrete has proliferated, allowing North American architects to build taller and evermore impressive multi-storey structures.
While these two materials dominate modern highrise construction, both come with serious environmental concerns. Between three and five per cent of the world's carbon emissions are generated in steel and concrete production, respectively. As such, a growing number of architects argue we must find a new material to meet building needs in the 21st century, and they believe they have the perfect alternative -- wood.
Of course, wood is not actually a new product; humans have been using lumber in construction for thousands of years. Even in 2013, almost 80 per cent of Canadians live in wood homes.
Because of very legitimate concerns of rot and fire, however, back at the turn of the last century building codes restricted wood structures to no more than four storeys -- and these regulations have remained on the books ever since.
Today though, the technology exists to build timber-framed highrises stretching up to 30 storeys tall. Proponents point out such wooden skyscrapers would not only be cheaper than their steel and concrete counterparts, but sustainably forested timber is also far more environmentally friendly than conventional construction materials. According to Vancouver architect Michael Green, there is enough wood grown every 13 minutes on this continent to make a 20-storey building, and unlike producing steel or concrete, which emits greenhouse gases, using wood in construction actually sequesters carbon.
In fact, due to the effects of climate change and insect infestation, there is a growing population of dead trees in North America. Instead of leaving these to decompose and release carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, advocates argue this bountiful resource could easily be harvested, treated and put to use building up cities.
In 2009, the first modern wood highrise was built in London, England. The nine-storey condominium tower proved hugely popular, with all 29 of its units selling out within an hour. A seven-storey building then went up in Sweden. Melbourne, Australia, currently boasts the world's tallest modern wood building, a 10-storey skyscraper.
The apartment block will soon be eclipsed though, as Vancouver is reviewing a proposal for a 16- to 20-storey wooden tower, and Sweden has already approved a skyscraper of 30 storeys (about the same height as the towers at Portage and Main).
Certainly, many people may be skeptical of the feasibility of wood cities, fearing the lumber will easily catch fire. Yet, as Geoff Triggs, an expert with LMDG Building Code Consultants points out, wood highrise construction does not use small two-by-fours. Rather, super-compressed mass timber -- engineered wood layered together with adhesives or fasteners -- is used to make huge panels 64 feet long and 12 feet wide. The compressed lumber has proven to be as strong as concrete but much lighter, which improves a building's structural integrity. Moreover, these panels can be made off-site and then installed, dramatically reducing construction time as there is no waiting for poured concrete to dry.
Most importantly, the compression process creates dense wood blocks that, much like a big fat tree stump in a fireplace, are very difficult to burn. When a fire does catch, it moves slowly and behaves predictably, allowing for uniform safety measures to be put in place. A 2012 study published by Surrey, B.C.'s, fire chief noted modern fire protection systems such as sprinklers (that did not exist when most regulations regarding wood building construction were adopted) "more than mitigate" the risks of building tall timber structures.
In the next 20 years, three billion people will be moving to cities around the world, and highrises will be a critical part of their housing mix. According to wood advocates, modern safety measures and technology mean this ancient material can be an asset in building these new skyscrapers. The biggest hurdle will likely be convincing the public that wood is just as safe as conventional concrete and steel. As more wooden buildings go up, however, engineers will be able to provide hard evidence as to whether or not they are more dangerous than conventional structures. It would be nice if they do prove to be secure; beyond the considerable environmental benefits, wood could add an appealing warmth to the skyline that is impossible to achieve with drab concrete and steel. If nothing else, it would give new meaning to the phrase "city of trees."
Benjamin Gillies is a political economy graduate from the University of Manitoba, where he focused on urban development and energy policy. He works as a consultant in Winnipeg.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition April 6, 2013 J1
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
Selinger playing favourites?
The long shadow of baby deaths
To check or not to check airline luggage
Clinton and the lobbyists
The IMF’s credibility problem
The Duffy effect on public trust
Unconventional oil pricing
Death of the Canadian Wheat Board
Time to open doors to Cuba
The legacy of Lincoln
European anti-trust laws behind Google investigation
Money kept by taxpayers is not a 'loss'
Blue-collar premium: University degrees are nice, but they don't fix the leaky faucet
Killer robots coming soon to a war near you
Police and the use of force
Mourning Lincoln — 150 years later
We're behind in competency training
Tories short on tangible policies
Talk to kids about money
GOP needs diversity to win
Galeano’s death huge loss for Latin America
Hillary Clinton faces hurdles in presidential bid
Christian loonies vs. pushy atheists
The battle over the Armenian genocide
Blue Bombers' 'operating profits' mask the whole financial picture
The Games of Copyright
Hillary needs to work for it
The lesson of balanced-budget legislation
Evolution battle continues
Princess parties for all, including the boys
Should marathon bomber die?
The cost of bureaucratic inertia
Canada’s institutional amnesia