Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
UN to investigate Canada's broken food system
As the blockbuster film the Hunger Games set a spring opening weekend record of $155 million in ticket sales, HungerCount was releasing its own precedent-setting numbers.
Put out every year by Food Banks Canada, this national survey highlights that food bank use has soared by 28 per cent in the past three years, with more than 850,000 Canadians making use of a food bank in a typical month. Unfortunately, this is the tip of the iceberg of what is wrong with the Canadian food system.
More than two million Canadians regularly don't have enough to eat, people on government income support and those earning minimum wage are often forced to choose between food and rent, and rates of food insecurity in some northern communities reaches an astounding 79 per cent.
At the same time, farmers and fishers are going out of business, a quarter of Canadians are considered obese, and the industrial food production system is one of the leading contributors to greenhouse gas emissions.
Our food system is broken, and the United Nations has noticed.
The United Nations is sending Olivier de Schutter, the special rapporteur on the right to food, to Canada to look into whether the right to food is being respected.
The Government of Canada has legally binding obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which we signed in 1976.
From May 5 to 16, de Schutter will travel across the country meeting with government officials, civil society and aboriginal peoples. It is his first visit to an OECD country.
What de Schutter will find is a food system gone seriously awry, and with no master plan.
Canada urgently needs a national food policy. In the last election, all federal parties called for either a national food policy or strategy. Food-related policy is administered ad hoc in departmental silos, rather than given the careful attention it deserves. An integrated national food policy would make it possible to take a comprehensive look at our food system and make decisions that take into account multiple factors, such as health, poverty, domestic and international markets, regional development needs, the environment and much more.
Done well, this could save money in health care spending. As momentum builds in Canada towards such an integrated approach, the question of participation is key.
The People's Food Policy, a citizen-led initiative to develop a national food policy, is Canada's best example of a participatory food policy process. Based on several years of grassroots work by more than 3,500 people, the People's Food Policy is also the most comprehensive food policy being advanced in Canada today. It includes policy analysis and recommendations on issues such as health, agriculture, the environment, Indigenous food sovereignty, science and technology, fisheries, international food policy, rural, remote and urban food issues and governance. The solutions-oriented recommendations are based on decades of innovative and successful work by the food movement -- people and organizations working on the front lines connecting institutions with locally and sustainably grown food, supporting urban gardens, running school nutrition programs and managing community kitchens.
If tackled collectively, recommendations included in the People's Food Policy would go a long way towards ensuring the right to food for all. This is not a question of lifestyle or personal choice, and even less a "game." Rather, we can expect de Schutter to point out at the end of his mission it's a matter of fundamental human rights, and something all of us should be concerned with.
Diana Bronson is executive director of Food Secure Canada, a national membership-based organization working towards zero hunger, healthy and safe food and sustainable food systems. www.foodsecurecanada.org
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 5, 2012 J11
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 32 articles for this week)
The Angelina Jolie effect
05/17/2013 1:20 PM 0View Related
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- A pollster's shame...
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Glimmers of hope for Pakistan
- Nice guys finish second
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- Erdogan caught overplaying his hand
- White House witch hunts for whistle blowers an embarrassment
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- A sad twist in the path that the corner store was on
- Manitobans want thrift, not PST hike
- Making NRC tool of industry bad for science
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Internet becoming a jungle
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Fisher could have been paid $16,000 for his 'wasted fish'
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Happy not-mother's days
- Internet becoming a jungle
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- Early childhood education overrated
- The Big Pitcher
- Canada and the Arctic Council
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Mother Nature springs into action
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.