Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
UN to investigate Canada's broken food system
As the blockbuster film the Hunger Games set a spring opening weekend record of $155 million in ticket sales, HungerCount was releasing its own precedent-setting numbers.
Put out every year by Food Banks Canada, this national survey highlights that food bank use has soared by 28 per cent in the past three years, with more than 850,000 Canadians making use of a food bank in a typical month. Unfortunately, this is the tip of the iceberg of what is wrong with the Canadian food system.
More than two million Canadians regularly don't have enough to eat, people on government income support and those earning minimum wage are often forced to choose between food and rent, and rates of food insecurity in some northern communities reaches an astounding 79 per cent.
At the same time, farmers and fishers are going out of business, a quarter of Canadians are considered obese, and the industrial food production system is one of the leading contributors to greenhouse gas emissions.
Our food system is broken, and the United Nations has noticed.
The United Nations is sending Olivier de Schutter, the special rapporteur on the right to food, to Canada to look into whether the right to food is being respected.
The Government of Canada has legally binding obligations under the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which we signed in 1976.
From May 5 to 16, de Schutter will travel across the country meeting with government officials, civil society and aboriginal peoples. It is his first visit to an OECD country.
What de Schutter will find is a food system gone seriously awry, and with no master plan.
Canada urgently needs a national food policy. In the last election, all federal parties called for either a national food policy or strategy. Food-related policy is administered ad hoc in departmental silos, rather than given the careful attention it deserves. An integrated national food policy would make it possible to take a comprehensive look at our food system and make decisions that take into account multiple factors, such as health, poverty, domestic and international markets, regional development needs, the environment and much more.
Done well, this could save money in health care spending. As momentum builds in Canada towards such an integrated approach, the question of participation is key.
The People's Food Policy, a citizen-led initiative to develop a national food policy, is Canada's best example of a participatory food policy process. Based on several years of grassroots work by more than 3,500 people, the People's Food Policy is also the most comprehensive food policy being advanced in Canada today. It includes policy analysis and recommendations on issues such as health, agriculture, the environment, Indigenous food sovereignty, science and technology, fisheries, international food policy, rural, remote and urban food issues and governance. The solutions-oriented recommendations are based on decades of innovative and successful work by the food movement -- people and organizations working on the front lines connecting institutions with locally and sustainably grown food, supporting urban gardens, running school nutrition programs and managing community kitchens.
If tackled collectively, recommendations included in the People's Food Policy would go a long way towards ensuring the right to food for all. This is not a question of lifestyle or personal choice, and even less a "game." Rather, we can expect de Schutter to point out at the end of his mission it's a matter of fundamental human rights, and something all of us should be concerned with.
Diana Bronson is executive director of Food Secure Canada, a national membership-based organization working towards zero hunger, healthy and safe food and sustainable food systems. www.foodsecurecanada.org
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition May 5, 2012 J11
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- 'Fried chicken' is no more a joke than the N-word
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- How to humble wing nuts
- Don’t confuse money with quality hospital care
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- How to humble wing nuts
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- How to humble wing nuts
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- How to humble wing nuts
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Housing homeless tackled
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Female chiefs needed
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- 'Longevity pensions' a promising idea
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.