Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
We should be testing organic farms
Now comes news about a study by the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine saying organic food is no more nutritious than regular food. The immediate response from top representatives of the organic industry has been that they never said organic food was more nutritious, only that it contains fewer harmful chemicals.
First of all, countless organic marketing campaigns have indeed implied or stated outright that organic food is more nutritious. But second, and of far greater importance, to claim we should pay more for organic food because it's produced without harmful synthetic fertilizers and pesticides is just wishful thinking given that organic fields are not tested.
I saw many cases of fraud while working for North America's largest organic certifying bodies in Canada and the United States. But without field testing I was powerless to do anything about it.
Imagine if they quit testing athletes at the Olympics. Imagine if, instead, athletes signed affidavits swearing they were clean. Imagine if Olympic inspectors called ahead to see if it was all right to drop by to collect a sample and allowed their schedule to be dictated by the athlete. That's how the multibillion-dollar organic industry runs. It's an honour-based free-for-all.
There's no way to know if any of this industry's advertised claims (many of which you subsidize with your taxes) are true. There are many honest organic farmers who work hard to bring high-quality, pure organic food to market. But, unless all organic farmers are forced to comply with the standards through routine organic testing during surprise inspections, these honest organic farmers go unrewarded for their hard work. Many of them are leaving the industry, unable to compete with cheap, untested "organic" imports which account for a whopping 90 per cent of the organic market.
Industry defenders say organic food is the most highly regulated food in the world. But so what? Regulation is useless unless it's backed up with surprise field visits and lab tests.
This is 2009, not the 1960s. Why aren't we testing organic farms?
I've campaigned for this since I became an inspector in 1998 and most organic farmers agree with me. But those running the industry vehemently disagree and attack my integrity instead of responding to the issue. It's no surprise that a British study found organic food to be no more nutritious than regular food: no one's minding the store.
We can't even begin to assess the value of organic methods if an unknown number of players are cheating. And where's the incentive for honest organic farmers to even bother trying harder?
I always thought organic food was supposed to be purer and more nutritious. Am I missing something here? It's also supposed to be easier on the environment, but we're miles away from even considering whether that's true.
I appreciate there's no way to guarantee absolute purity.
The world is, sadly, a much polluted place. But why can't we test organic farms to at least make sure farmers follow the rules? Isn't that the place to start?
Governments tried to implement organic field testing but were beaten back by the industry and a mere paper-based honour system was implemented instead.
So tell me, do you think that, maybe, there's a much larger problem here than just a lack of nutrition?
Mischa Popoff is a former organic inspector with a bachelor's degree in history. He has been paid by some organic farmers to get their crops tested on a not-for-profit basis. You can visit his website at www.isitorganic.ca.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 4, 2009 A11
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 35 articles for this week)
This summer, check out health care elsewhere
1:00 AM 0For many Canadians, the Victoria Day long weekend marks the beginning of summertime holiday planning, if not a late-May escape ...
View Related
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- A decade after Mad Cow — the legacy of a crisis
- Clothing sellers should unite on Bangladesh
- This summer, check out health care elsewhere
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- ‘Signs’ of hope, little more, in Greece
- How to make another bad winter for honeybees better
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Cash for coitus scheme gets axed in Oz
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- Harper fuels opposition to oilsands projects
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Never take candy from a stranger
- Low turnout makes farce of B.C. election
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- What are they smoking at First Nations Bank?
- Celebrated economics theory wrong
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- Ruining lives for cash flow
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Angelina Jolie: 'I feel empowered... '
- Why we assume the worst
- Public debt management, the Alberta example
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ice roads, airships could work together
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Industry, First Nations partnerships exploding
- Ageism is rampant in Canada
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.