Hey there, time traveller!
This article was published 6/5/2014 (730 days ago), so information in it may no longer be current.
NEW YORK -- During the last week or so, multiple stories in the news have been asking why the media are ignoring the kidnapping of roughly 300 girls by Boko Haram, an extremist anti-western group in Nigeria. Yet there have been literally hundreds of Facebook posts, thousands of tweets and dozens of stories in the media about what is going on. It took a week or two -- longer than it should have, yes, considering the horror of what has been perpetrated -- but in the end, this case has got more attention than any single case of girls abducted in armed conflict in recent memory, possibly ever. People are paying attention.
As that becomes evident, all the outcry over "why aren't we paying attention" starts to look like it's part of a deeper public distress: Why have we not paid attention in the past when thousands of girls -- and boys -- have been abducted in armed conflict? Why aren't we paying attention, right now, to the girls caught in human trafficking webs or sold into early marriages or held in captivity as "wives" by armed groups? Why are we only now outraged? And will this outrage sustain itself as situations such as this one unendingly arise? Will any amount of anger lead to any concrete solution?
What happened to these girls isn't new, sadly. Instances of the trafficking of children in places of conflict are myriad and worldwide. But as I delved into what I thought would be a story about the larger issue of the abduction and selling of girls, I realized that first I had to clarify what this story is actually about.
On April 14, an extremist group whose name roughly translates as "Western education is forbidden" abducted the Nigerian girls from a high school in the northeastern town of Chibok. The convoy disappeared quickly into the forest, and ever since rumours have trickled out of the country about their fate. There are reports the girls have been sold into marriage or sexual slavery for "as little as" $12 (as if their being sold for a higher price would somehow improve the situation).
Boko Haram is trying to wrest control of northern Nigeria back from what it sees as "false Muslims." The International Crisis Group estimates the al-Qaida-affiliated terrorist group has killed more than 4,000 people in Nigeria since it began its insurgency four years ago; it perpetrated seven attacks on schools in 2013, Amnesty International says. Human Rights Watch says the militants have previously used children as weapons.
The kidnapping of so many schoolgirls at once, however, has upped the ante. Boko Haram has chosen a group -- girls -- that is historically vulnerable, yet whose members carry precious undertones about the purity of most societies. And with that designation as the bearers of purity, girls become a group that is little more than a symbol. In reality, these girls are human beings who are marginalized, exploited and ignored globally. Girls are the low-hanging fruit of the biblically proportioned anger at Eve.
To view this as a simple case of trafficking (or modern-day slavery, as it is often called) is to overlook a larger point: Crimes against women and girls are not only commonplace, but they go ignored, unprosecuted and unreported by the international media every single day, especially when they occur in the global south.
Beyond the difficulty of figuring out how to categorize this case, there is a cultural limit to how far we are willing to go in discussing something this harrowing, says media activist and writer Soraya Chemaly.
"Things like sexualized violence against women and girls seems to be always just the wallpaper," says Chemaly. "It's just there, and people expect it to be there, and we manage that through a whole series of euphemisms in conversations and the media." News stories have been referring to what happened to the kidnapped Nigerian girls as "child marriage," Chemaly says, an expression that "waters down what's happening and makes it palatable to people when it's really unpalatable."
But understanding what is going on is crucial to putting an end to it, says Akila Radhakrishnan, legal director at the Global Justice Center: "The failure to comprehend the specific experiences of girls impedes accountability, reparations and rehabilitation efforts." The case of Congolese militia leader Thomas Lubanga, at the International Criminal Court, for instance, which focused on accountability for the use of child soldiers, failed to include any form of sexualized violence in the charges or the sentencing.
"Of the 129 victims who participated in the trial, 30 reported being subject to or witnessing sexualized violence. For those girls, sexualized violence was a part of how they experienced the conflict," Radhakrishnan says.
But the decision not to include consideration of this crime in the final verdict, notes Radhakrishnan, "renders justice meaningless for these survivors."
In trying to classify what has happened to the Nigerian girls, I spoke to Cristina Finch, head of Amnesty International USA's women's human rights program.
"Is this sort of what people are normally discussing when they're discussing the problem of worldwide trafficking? Not exactly," says Finch. What has happened here, she explains, is more about how women are used repeatedly and historically as a tool of war.
Boko Haram is sneering at a world that has shown time and again that girls are expendable and easily weaponized. It is targeting society's most defenceless and fetishized. This act in essence is not dissimilar to how the Syrian government has used women as targets of punishment in that war, allegedly perpetrating rape on women and girls in front of their husbands or sending videotapes of rape to families as a means of humiliating them. Both are showing they can take what "belongs" to other men and use them as they please.
Tobore Ovuorie, a Nigerian journalist who has investigated human trafficking in the country, told me she sees the kidnapping as a Rubik's cube of child marriage, spoils of war, trafficking and sexual exploitation. The girls kidnapped from the school in Nigeria "would be sold to sex slavery, working on plantations or other forms of labour, and they will be resold over and over again when their masters feel they have outlived their value," she says. But, she adds, the girls were abducted under the guise of "war."
Undoubtedly this is a bold move by Boko Haram in Nigeria's ongoing conflict, meant to cement its power in a country that tries to ignore the terrorist group or wish it away, says Adotei Akwei, Amnesty's managing director of government relations, who is closely following the case.
Some of the girls are "being sold as rewards," Akwei says, while others will be given to fighters as prizes. Such rewards are given in conflicts all over the world, including in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where I have met girls who had been kidnapped by various militias and held as sexual slaves for months. The rest of the Nigerian schoolgirls, Akwei says, are likely being sold for cash to raise funds for the cause. The kidnappings make Boko Haram more apparently vicious and formidable, he notes. "Armed groups tend to compete with each other about how badly they can intimidate a population."
In that estimation, it would seem, Boko Haram is winning.
Lauren Wolfe is a journalist and director of Women Under Siege, a journalism project on sexualized violence based at the Women's Media Center in New York.
-- Foreign Policy