Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Your job influences the sex of your children
So far, the genetics of the link between profession and offspring gender is not understood. But researchers suggest that offspring gender reflects the "brain types" of one or both parents.
Although maleness or femaleness in humans is determined by genetic factors, new studies show that environmental and social influences can contribute. Research at the University Medical Centre in The Netherlands indicates some environmental or social variables are capable of "silencing female meiotic sex chromosomes".
In turtles, crocodiles, alligators, some lizards and birds, the sex of offspring is determined by the temperatures at which eggs incubate, says Jeffrey Lovich of the U.S. Geological Survey. Higher temperatures tend to produce male embryos.
"Selection should favour 'environmental sex determination (ESD)' over 'genetic sex determination (GSD)' when the developmental environment differentially influences male vs. female fitness," researchers at Iowa State University and the University of Sydney confirmed in a recent report.
Studies by Satoshi Kanazawa of the London School of Economics shows a disproportionate number of parents with Type-S brains produce sons; Type-E brains tend to produce daughters.
Researcher Griet Vandermassen of Ghent University has explained that Type-S brains tend to occur in people who excel in "systemizing," or figuring things out. Type-E brains tend to occur in people who are skilled at "empathasizing" (assessing through one's personality, especially feelings). Males most often have Type-S brains; females have Type-E brains.
"Brain types are heritable and they affect boys and girls differently," the researchers conclude.
"That is why systemizing parents tend to produce more sons, empathizing parents produce more daughters.
"When one or the other or both parents have Type-S brains, the couple is expected to produce more sons; when one or both have an excess of empathasizing skills, the couple is expected to produce more daughters," the researchers report.
In Canada, the overall human sex ratio is .98 males for every female; 1.06 males per female at birth. But Type-S parents produce 140 sons per 100 daughters; Type-E parents produce 135 daughters per 100 sons.
Type-S professions include: engineers, mathematicians, auditors, physicists, chemists and scientists. Type-E professions include: nurses, dieticians, therapists and teachers.
Studies show that engineers and others in the Type-S professions are most likely to have sons, whereas nurses and others in the Type-E professions are more likely to have daughters.
Preliminary data suggest other factors are involved in determining offspring sex. A disproportionately large number of tall parents produce sons; shorter parents more daughters. Violent fathers are much more likely to produce sons.
Promiscuous parents are likely to have sons. Beautiful parents more often have daughters.
Scientists speculate that Type-S brains were more adaptively advantageous to ancestral males; Type-E brains were more beneficial to ancestral females. Social and environmental factors tended to favour one type or the other and ultimately influenced sex ratios in human populations.
Robert Alison has a PhD in zoology and is based in Victoria, B.C.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition October 13, 2009 A13
More Analysis
- Back to Top
- Return to Analysis
More Analysis
(1 of 8 articles for today)
Will stereotype perceptions of crack cocaine go to pot?
1:00 AM 0Bill Clinton never inhaled; Jack Layton said he never exhaled. Pierre Trudeau is believed to have done it, and so ...
Poll
Most Popular Analysis
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- 'Fried chicken' is no more a joke than the N-word
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- How to humble wing nuts
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- When Harper spoke, it was wise to listen
- Don’t confuse money with quality hospital care
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- BlackBerry: off the mat, hitting back
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- Physician networks a way forward for health care
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- Never take candy from a stranger
- How to humble wing nuts
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Don, it's not about nakedness
- Speeding fine only half of it
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Smart people SLEEP LATE
- Manitoba could follow B.C. on surrogacy issue
- City council can't decide which bus to ride
- The Angelina Jolie effect
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- How to humble wing nuts
- Ford puts Toronto on the map at last
- Lower drug prices, lower costs, better care?
- What is Struthers afraid of?
- How to humble wing nuts
- Bill 18 is perfect example of bad law
- THIS IS NO WAY TO MAKE A POINT!!!
- Harper embraces multilateralism on Arctic issues
- Elijah's essence was most easily found in the wilderness
- Mental health system lacking funds, awareness
- 'Genetic engineered' might save planet
- Housing homeless tackled
- A small but welcome crack in supply management
- 'Done deal' offends Whiteshell cottagers
- Kim Sigurdson It's time for government fish monger to cut bait
- Speeding fine only half of it
- How CBC and others torque ratings
- Where is Canada's strategy to help Ukraine?
- Climate options -- grim, grimmer, grimmest
- Mother Nature springs into action
- Female chiefs needed
- Ashton might try to get the facts straight
- 'Longevity pensions' a promising idea
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.