• Random Acts of Kindness

    Happy ending to hit-and-run thanks to Marc

    WHILE my car was parked at St. Vital Centre, someone parked beside me and opened their car door so hard they dented my door, then quickly moved to another parking spot.

  • Inayat Singh: Digits

    The NDP's complicated leadership election system, and how it works for them

    The Manitoba NDP uses a complicated delegate system to elect its leader, a process that will be under scrutiny at its leadership convention in March. Here’s a look at how it works, and two alternative systems used by Canadian political parties.

  • Kelly Taylor: Road Noise

    The pull of magnetic ride: how to transform an SUV

    The GMC Yukon began life as, essentially, a warmed-over Sierra, which was essentially a warmed-over Chevy Silverado, with an SUV body.

  • Under the Dome

    Kissing your sister, NDP style

    Larry and I talk a lot. Sometimes it feels that we talk more to one another than we do our own families. Lately we talk a lot about the NDP leadership race and who will be the province's next premier.

  • Nick Martin: Telling Tales out of School

    Stories need proof, all voices with a chance to be heard

  • Bob Cox

    Maple Leaf making tracks in Sweden

    If you are alarmed by the yellow and blue symbols that seem everywhere since the arrival of IKEA in Winnipeg, you can take comfort in the fact that a similar invasion is  happening on the other side of the ocean.

  • Mia Rabson: The Capital Chronicles

    Terror in the capital

    It was just another normal day in Ottawa.

  • Mary Agnes Welch's Gripe Juice

    Muzzling those who know

    Like any reporter should, I cringe at anonymous sources. In many cases, I worry it's lazy journalism that allows people to take swipes at rivals with no consequences or manipulate a story in secret. Anonymous sources also make it hard for readers to judge someone's credibility and motivation for speaking to the media. It's up to the reporter to ask "why is this person really talking to me? Is there a reason that undermines the information they're offering?" In the race to be first with a good story, we may not always ask that enough. I've tried, in recent years, to avoid using anonymous sources, especially in political stories. In fact, when Shelly Glover was named Manitoba's federal minister, Bruce Owen and I made a little deal with each other to only quote people on the record for a short profile we were assigned. (The result was kind of a boring story, unfortunately, which also illustrates why unnamed sources can be hard to resist.)
    But what should reporters do when people who know the most about a complex and troubled system are barred from speaking publicly? That's the case with child welfare, a system always under scrutiny, again since the death of Tina Fontaine. 
    In the years since Phoenix Sinclair's murder, I've talked to probably two dozen child welfare workers - some for hours, some for a few minutes, some over and over, all off the record. I don't think I've ever quoted one by name. When they're hired, child welfare workers sign gag orders barring them from speaking about their work. They say they would face discipline or termination if they spoke to a reporter, and their union agrees. They often give me information I can use to question the province or child welfare agencies, but sometimes I resort to the familiar "sources said."
    This blanket gag order protects the agencies, the authorities, the government and even First Nations chiefs who have some degree of control over child welfare services. I can't see how it protects children.
    I can understand barring CFS workers from revealing private, deeply personal information about kids and families in care. In my experience, CFS staff are incredibly careful not to do that. I once had a long and detailed conversation with a social worker from a northern agency who referred in passing to a death review done on a child she'd had contact with. I asked her which child, figuring I'd recognize the name. She would not tell me anything - not the gender, age, where the kid lived, whether we'd written about him or her before. She got mad that I even asked.
    Privacy, I get. What I don't get is why child welfare staff can't talk about the system - staffing levels, funding, programs, political interference, corruption, their own safety. Given the problems we've seen for a decade in child welfare, and the huge cost both in money and misery, there is a public interest in hearing from the people who know the system intimately and who might help us fix it. 
    Today, I did a story quoting two anonymous support workers who staff group homes. They raised fears about the quality of service provided by Complete Care, a for-profit firm that backfills group homes. I got two more phone calls this morning from group home staff who echoed all the same fears, which assuaged some of my anxiety about building a story around nameless people. The value in reporting their detailed experiences, especially in light of mounting evidence about Tina Fontaine's last days, outweighed my qualms about quoting them anonymously. They had credible, valuable, interesting first-hand information we couldn't get quickly any other way. 
    By the same token, social workers often feel, quite legitimately, that we pick on them, that they are blamed when things go wrong. Off-the-record conversations have been invaluable to me in mitigating some of that, in helping me understand the pressures, the case loads, the profound damage done to kids that no one worker can fix. On-the-record conversations with a face attached would help me explain that to the public.
    If real people were allowed to come forward, it might spur the kind of change we need in child welfare. It might prompt public support for the cash to invest, for example, in skilled shelter workers who are paid a decent enough wage to stay for a while, instead of contracting kids out to a temp firm.

  • Mike Deal: The Hungry Eye

    It wasn’t enough to only be a witness

    A few weeks ago I met with and photographed Colin Vandenberg, who had just finished challenging himself to eating only about $1 worth of food each day for a month. The effort arose from his trip to Malawi, a country in Africa, and his volunteer work for New Life Centre documenting life there.


Do you believe monitoring patients for a time at home, the "virtual waiting room," will help reduce waits for hospital admissions?

View Results

View Related Story

Ads by Google