Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION
‘Twas The Night Before Christmas – The Legal Version
We all know lawyers often have their own language – and you wouldn’t be alone in wondering if they sometimes get paid by the word. To that end, I present to you one of my favourite finds, a remake of the classic "Twas The Night Before Christmas" poem as if it were written by a lawyer. The author of the piece – which is readily available online – is not known. But full credit to whoever sat down and came up with it!
Enjoy – And have a safe and happy holiday!
"Whereas, on or about the night prior to Christmas, there did occur at a certain improved piece of real property (hereinafter "the House") a general lack of stirring by all creatures therein, including, but not limited to a mouse.
A variety of foot apparel, e.g. stocking, socks, etc., had been affixed by and around the chimney in said House in the hope and/or belief that St. Nick a/k/a/St. Nicholas a/k/a/ Santa Claus (hereinafter "Claus") would arrive at sometime thereafter.
The minor residents, i.e. the children, of the aforementioned House, were located in their individual beds and were engaged in nocturnal hallucinations, i.e. dreams, wherein vision of confectionery treats, including, but not limited to, candies, nuts and/or sugar plums, did dance, cavort and otherwise appear in said dreams.
Whereupon the party of the first part (sometimes hereinafter referred to as "I"), being the joint-owner in fee simple of the House with the parts of the second part (hereinafter "Mamma"), and said Mamma had retired for a sustained period of sleep. (At such time, the parties were clad in various forms of headgear, e.g. kerchief and cap.)
Suddenly, and without prior notice or warning, there did occur upon the unimproved real property adjacent and appurtent to said House, i.e. the lawn, a certain disruption of unknown nature, cause and/or circumstance. The party of the first part did immediately rush to a window in the House to investigate the cause of such disturbance.
At that time, the party of the first part did observe, with some degree of wonder and/or disbelief, a miniature sleigh (hereinafter the "Vehicle") being pulled and/or drawn very rapidly through the air by approximately eight (8) reindeer. The driver of the Vehicle appeared to be and in fact was, the previously referenced Claus.
Said Claus was providing specific direction, instruction and guidance to the approximately eight (8) reindeer and specifically identified the animal co-conspirators by name: Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donder and Blitzen (hereinafter the "Deer"). (Upon information and belief, it is further asserted that an additional co-conspirator named Rudolph may have been involved.)
The party of the first part witnessed Claus, the Vehicle and the Deer intentionally and willfully trespass upon the roofs of several residences located adjacent to and in the vicinity of the House, and noted that the Vehicle was heavily laden with packages, toys and other items of unknown origin or nature. Suddenly, without prior invitation or permission, either express or implied, the Vehicle arrived at the House, and Claus entered said House via the chimney.
Said Claus was clad in a red fur suit, which was partially covered with residue from the chimney, and he carried a large sack containing a portion of the aforementioned packages, toys, and other unknown items. He was smoking what appeared to be tobacco in a small pipe in blatant violation of local ordinances and health regulations.
Claus did not speak, but immediately began to fill the stocking of the minor children, which hung adjacent to the chimney, with toys and other small gifts. (Said items did not, however, constitute "gifts" to said minor pursuant to the applicable provisions of the U.S. Tax Code.) Upon completion of such task, Claus touched the side of his nose and flew, rose and/or ascended up the chimney of the House to the roof where the Vehicle and Deer waited and/or served as "lookouts." Claus immediately departed for an unknown destination.
However, prior to the departure of the Vehicle, Deer and Claus from said House, the party of the first part did hear Claus state and/or exclaim: "Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!" Or words to that effect."
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
- Back to Top
- Return to Blogs
Poll
Most Popular Blogs
- Babinsky circus obscures crucial issues
- Friendly Manitoba? Absolutely
- Energy savings: if it’s such a no-brainer. . .
- Was "evil rapist" doomed by circumstances?
- Made little girl’s day
- Feels privileged to have great care
- Truly the best
- Bombers: please, please, please don't suck
- Neighbour Sam is just the best
- Guardian Angel caring for Kelsey
- Was "evil rapist" doomed by circumstances?
- Bombers: please, please, please don't suck
- Babinsky circus obscures crucial issues
- Haircuts and cupcakes
- Seriously, we need proof
- Feels privileged to have great care
- Friendly Manitoba? Absolutely
- Energy savings: if it’s such a no-brainer. . .
- Judge Giesbrecht was one of the good ones
- Failing Phoenix - Face To Face With Her Killers
- Judge Giesbrecht was one of the good ones
- MTS horrifies Montana educator
- Was "evil rapist" doomed by circumstances?
- Teachers won't pander to the media
- Haircuts and cupcakes
- Lower fees or better universities?
- Bombers: please, please, please don't suck
- Feels privileged to have great care
- An MP scorned, an independent made
- Babinsky circus obscures crucial issues
- Was "evil rapist" doomed by circumstances?
- Babinsky circus obscures crucial issues
- Bombers: please, please, please don't suck
- Judge Giesbrecht was one of the good ones
- MTS horrifies Montana educator
- Was "evil rapist" doomed by circumstances?
- Babinsky circus obscures crucial issues
- The missing daughter he's never met
- The ghosts of the legislative building
- Lower fees or better universities?
- Q&A: Wes Pearson, Dodgy Bros.
- Scattering ashes
- Bombers: please, please, please don't suck
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.