Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

I would prefer it was a good fight, no matter who wins

  • Print
I really, really hope the next federal election is a good battle. Regardless of who wins, I like a good, close fight that is a bit of a cliff hanger. Nice for us in the peanut gallery when you aren't writing about who is going to win the election in the first five days of the campaign.Given the latest poll results, I guess the next election (which could come as early as this fall) could be close. But I'm concerned it won't be a quality tilt. The Liberals continue to hold ground against the Conservatives, despite a lacklustre leader. The Tories, on the other hand, continue to demonstrate little appetite for broadening their base by looking for issues and policies that appeal outside core supporters. Given that the Conservatives are in power, and control the date of the next election, their failure to broaden their platform is really quite a mystery.Recent stories about cuts to arts funding demonstrate, I think, this curious inability to see opportunities to broaden support. Although total arts spending is up significantly since the Tories took power, there have been swift and deep cuts recently to some programs. This comes on the heels of introduction of Bill C-10, which would cut funding to Telefilm Canada. Although the Tories have generally denied it, there has always been a suggestion the cuts had to do with the content supported by the programs. (I have always believed that voters in this country, by and large, don't want politicians to decide what kind of art is worthy of public support. Could be wrong.) The worse problem is that the decisions were made without any consultation with or warning to the people who administer the money.Why would they do this? I have always felt comfortable deferring to Hacks and Wonks for insight into the Conservative mind. In his recent posting, Hs&Ws suggests the funding cuts are only temporary and even so, this might not be a bad strategy:"The arts community are not Tory supporters, so the short term pain is relatively minor. Over the long term, the Tories manage to tweak a source of funding often directed exclusively towards their opponents."I agree with the basic analysis, but will disagree with the assessment of the potential harm. Pissing off groups that don't support you is a great strategy if you have a majority government. But if you're in a minority position, and seem to be unable to find traction toward a majority, it seems to be bad strategy to go around poking your traditional opponents in the eye. It's going to take a major breakthrough in Ontario and Quebec to get the Tories over the minority hump, and I just can't see how messing with arts funding is going to turn the tide in either of those provinces. However, the Hs&Ws post was very brief, and I assume (with good cause) there is more to the thesis.UPDATE: More than $40 million in total cuts.-30-

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

About Dan Lett

Dan Lett came to Winnipeg in 1986, less than a year out of journalism school.

Despite the fact that he’s originally from Toronto and has a fatal attraction to the Maple Leafs, Winnipeggers let him stay.

In the following years, he has worked at bureaus covering every level of government – from city hall to the national bureau in Ottawa.

He has had bricks thrown at him in riots following the 1995 Quebec referendum, wrote stories that helped in part to free three wrongly convicted men, met Fidel Castro, interviewed three Philippine presidents, crossed several borders in Africa illegally, chased Somali pirates in a Canadian warship and had several guns pointed at him.

In other words, he’s had every experience a journalist could even hope for. He has also been fortunate enough to be a two-time nominee for a National Newspaper Award, winning in 2003 for investigations.

Other awards include the B’Nai Brith National Human Rights Media Award and nominee for the Michener Award for Meritorious Public Service in Journalism.

Now firmly rooted in Winnipeg, Dan visits Toronto often but no longer pines to live there.


Ads by Google