Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

A good offence is a good offence.....

  • Print

The honeymoon between new Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff and the Conservative government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper is now officially over. It's been somewhat remarkable it lasted this long.

Desperate to win the support of the Liberals, the Tories had given Ignatieff a fairly easy time of it after he wrangled the leadership away from other contenders in a shot-gun wedding last fall.

Now that Ignatieff has his Liberals on board to support the budget, the gloves are coming off again. And the Tories are indicating they are preparing to launch a series of attack advertisements againt Ignatieff, similar to those used to rock and already shaky Stephane Dion prior to the 2008 federal election.

(As an aside, I refuse to refer to Ignatieff as Iggy. There is only one Iggy -- Iggy Pop -- and frankly, I don't see the resemblance.)

Why the change in strategy? The Tories may believe they are coming out of a prolonged defensive posture, brought on last fall when the party failed to win a majority by taking full advantage of a deeply depleted Liberal party.

Certainly, by the time Finance Minister Jim Flaherty tabled his November economic statement, the Tories were in full circle-the-wagon mode.

Condemnation of their economic strategy, a failure to accurately predict the evolution of the economy, and a general sense of insensitivity put the Tories on their heels. They needed help, first from the governor general who prorogued parliament, and then from the Liberals, to pass the January budget and stave off a vote of non-confidence.

Ah, but that was then and this is now. Having secured support for the budget, the Tories are in attack mode. They've ratcheted up the rhetoric during Question Period, and national news reports indicate Tory staffers are poring over Ignatieff's interviews, televisions spots and writings to find the embarassing and controversial material.

The motivation is clear. "We poll better on offence," a Tory staffer told The Globe and Mail. Indeed.

Politics is a full-contact sport and attack advertisements are certainly well within the accepted rules of engagement. Political parties use attack ads for one simple reason - they work.

I know politicians often decry attack ads as signs of a desperate strategy, but all parties at one time or another use them because they tend to produce results.

Attack ads serve two real purposes. First, they do tend to sway some undecided voters for whom a tarnished image may be enough to get them to vote in another direction. And second, they tend to stoke the emotions of supporters which ensures they show up on election day to vote, if for no other reason to stop the other guy from getting in.

That said, the Tories should consider the fact that this tactic has not, in fact, proved to be a winning formula in and of itself.

While the Tory attack campaigns have been successful in weakening the opposition, it appeared that Dion, left to his own devices, probably did enough to scuttle himself. Creating a negative image of a leader who is already suffering from a negative image is a qualified accomplisment at best.

The attack ads also seem to run contrary to the other principal goal of the Tory election strategy, namely to make Harper look like he's a kinder and gentler man of the people.

In other words, the Tories would like you to think Harper isn't the kind of leader who would approve attack ads. Perhaps it's time to admit these two tactics are in conflict.

The concern here for Tory supporters is that disparaging Ignatieff is not, on its own, enough to give the Tories a majority government. We know they are masters of making the opposition look unappealing. But so far, we haven't seen any indication the Tories know how to make themselves seem more appealing.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

About Dan Lett

Dan Lett came to Winnipeg in 1986, less than a year out of journalism school.

Despite the fact that he’s originally from Toronto and has a fatal attraction to the Maple Leafs, Winnipeggers let him stay.

In the following years, he has worked at bureaus covering every level of government – from city hall to the national bureau in Ottawa.

He has had bricks thrown at him in riots following the 1995 Quebec referendum, wrote stories that helped in part to free three wrongly convicted men, met Fidel Castro, interviewed three Philippine presidents, crossed several borders in Africa illegally, chased Somali pirates in a Canadian warship and had several guns pointed at him.

In other words, he’s had every experience a journalist could even hope for. He has also been fortunate enough to be a two-time nominee for a National Newspaper Award, winning in 2003 for investigations.

Other awards include the B’Nai Brith National Human Rights Media Award and nominee for the Michener Award for Meritorious Public Service in Journalism.

Now firmly rooted in Winnipeg, Dan visits Toronto often but no longer pines to live there.


Ads by Google