Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Getting only what we deserve

  • Print

The Globe and Mail reported this week that the Conservative government will proceed soon with legislation to increase the number of federal seats in Ontario, Alberta and Quebec. Government House Leader Peter Van Loan told the G&M the move was necessary to address the needs of larger provinces with growing populations. "What has happened is that we’ve have had a situation arise where votes are worth very different amounts across the country," Van Loan said. "This is because the existing formula restrains the growth of seats in areas that are experiencing high growth, particularly in Ontario, Alberta, British Columbia."

However, neither the G&M or Van Loan addressed the issue of how this proposal would affect smaller provinces. There was some concern expressed about how this would impact Quebec, which in many respects has hit above its weight because of a variety of factors, not least of which was the on-again, off-again threat of separation. However, in this most recent election, the Conservatives demonstrated quite clearly there is a majority government to be had without substantial support from Quebec.

So what’s behind all this? At a time when the Tories have proven conclusively you can build a majority with concentrated support in only a few provinces, moving to increase the number of seats in those provinces seems, at first blush, rather cynical. However, you cannot ignore the fact population gains in those provinces do in fact require some sort of response. It’s not cynical, but it is very fortuitous that the Tories have an opportunity to rebalance Parliament at a time when those provinces that stand to gain also happen to vote predominantly Tory.

And what will happen to smaller provinces? It’s hard to imagine how provinces such as Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and the Atlantic provinces could have less influence than they do now, which is to say, very little. In the last federal election, Prime Minister Stephen Harper visited Manitoba once. This was a reflection of the fact that Manitoba — which was seen as having little growth potential — was not important to the Tory war plan. In the end, the Tories did pick up two seats despite little support from the central campaign. But that is not likely to earn Manitoba any additional attention from Ottawa. It is important to note this isn’t just a Tory attitude; the former Liberal government had little love for the smaller provinces, concentrating its campaigns on already seat-rich Ontario.

Although it’s true a vote in a densely populated urban Ontario riding is not "worth" the same as a vote in a Winnipeg riding, it’s hard to argue that Ontario in particular doesn’t already eclipse the federal political agenda. Will adding seats to Ontario give the province more heft in the House of Commons? Not likely. But it does mean it will become even easier for a single party to focus its campaign on only one or two provinces in pursuit of a majority.

In trying to be fairer to voters in Ontario, Alberta and B.C., it’s almost impossible to avoid weakening the already weak position of smaller provinces. That may be seen as the lesser of two evils, but it does at some level weaken the very nature of the federation.

In the end, this IS a debate about fairness, but not fairness for all.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes


  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.

About Dan Lett

Dan Lett came to Winnipeg in 1986, less than a year out of journalism school.

Despite the fact that he’s originally from Toronto and has a fatal attraction to the Maple Leafs, Winnipeggers let him stay.

In the following years, he has worked at bureaus covering every level of government – from city hall to the national bureau in Ottawa.

He has had bricks thrown at him in riots following the 1995 Quebec referendum, wrote stories that helped in part to free three wrongly convicted men, met Fidel Castro, interviewed three Philippine presidents, crossed several borders in Africa illegally, chased Somali pirates in a Canadian warship and had several guns pointed at him.

In other words, he’s had every experience a journalist could even hope for. He has also been fortunate enough to be a two-time nominee for a National Newspaper Award, winning in 2003 for investigations.

Other awards include the B’Nai Brith National Human Rights Media Award and nominee for the Michener Award for Meritorious Public Service in Journalism.

Now firmly rooted in Winnipeg, Dan visits Toronto often but no longer pines to live there.


Ads by Google