Mike on Crime
with Mike McIntyre
- We knew the province had one of the lowest crime rates in the country. So perhaps that explains why an investigation has been launched into a wild hockey brawl involving the son of NHL goaltending legend Patrick Roy. (Read story HERE)In case you've just crawled out of a cave, here's the Reader's Digest version of what happened (followed by my two cents)The Chicoutimi Sagueneens were laying a pretty good butt-kicking on their rivals, the Quebec Remparts, in a Quebec Major Junior Hockey League game Saturday night.Not surprisingly, things started to get a little squirrely on the ice. That's bound to happen when you have a bunch of hormonally-charged young men and a lopsided score (7-1 at the time).The pushing and shoving quickly escalated into a full-scale brawl.Remparts goalie Jonathan Roy - no doubt nursing a case of sunburn on the back of his neck from the red goal light being turned on so much - skated the full length of the ice to take on the Sagueneens goalie.One minor problem - Bobby Nadeau didn't want to dance.Roy didn't seem to care, unleashing a flurry of punches on the clearly shocked Nadeau. He knocked him to the ice, continued to pound away - then gave Chicoutimi fans the "one-fingered salute" as he left the ice.The QMJHL investigated the incident - which made sports highlights across North America - and dished out some justice.Jonathan Roy was suspended for seven games. His famous father - who coaches the Remparts - was handed a five-game ban for failing to control his players, especially his son. There were suggestions Roy encouraged his boy to go after Nadeau, a claim he denies. Patrick Roy has also apologized for his conduct.Now that should have been the end of what was a fairly ugly incident.Yet apparently this case is far from over. Police and prosecutors are reviewing the tapes and considering criminal charges.I don't understand this.Let me be clear - I don't condone what happened here for a minute. It was stupid. It was senseless. And it has no place in sport.But I must question why authorities can't allow the QMJHL to police itself, as has already been done.Jonathan Roy is a lot of things for doing what he did - words like gutless and cowardly come to mind - but is he a criminal?That's not to say there aren't times when outside investigations aren't warranted.Incidents like the vicious, pre-meditated Todd Bertuzzi attack on Steve Moore, which ended the young player's career and saw Bertuzzi charged with assault, can't be overlooked.Nor can incidents when sports clearly can't police themselves - such as the steroid epidemic we now see in baseball that has caught the attention of congress.But if we're now going to start investigating every time an emotional hockey game or other sporting event boils over, where does it end? I think former NHL goaltender Kelly Hrudey, now an analyst for Hockey Night In Canada, is bang-on with his take. Hrudey says the incident likely would not have received much attention had it not involved Roy, a fiery personality who is also one of the greatest goalies in NHL history.“I feel the whole incident has been overblown,” Hrudey said. “It’s a front page story in Western Canada and it’s not big news in any sense. It’s ridiculous.”Agree? Disagree? Post your thoughts below. You can also click HERE to cast your vote in my latest Jury Poll question.
- HERE and then type in Sunday Mar. 9 and 7 p.m. to listen)In a nutshell, Wilson and his then 22-year-old fiance, Tara Wilson, learned in 1994 they were going to have a baby while living together in Iowa. Tara's family objected to this news and quickly whisked their daughter back home to Oregon.What followed next can only be described as a father's worst nightmare.Dan Wilson was served with a restraining order telling him he could have no contact with Tara or his soon-to-be-born child. The family had convincted a justice official - based solely on their own claims - that he had raped her and posed an ongoing danger.In fact, the entire story was bogus, a smokescreen designed to buy the woman some time. Because by the time Dan Wilson hired a lawyer and got a court date to fight the stunning allegations, Tara Wilson and her newborn child were gone.As in out of the country.Hallock said the FBI have learned family members somehow helped get them across the U.S. border and into western Canada.Meanwhile, Tara Wilson's false claims were thrown out of court when she didn't appear. A judge ruled Dan Wilson had sole custody. A federal warrant for kidnapping was issued for the mother of his child.More than 13 years have passed. The warrant still exists. Tara Wilson is still a fugitive. And Ashlyn Wilson is now a teenager.Hallock said there have been numerous reported sightings of them in B.C., Alberta and Washington state. Yet somehow Tara Wilson has eluded capture.And Dan Wilson has been forced to watch the daughter he's never been able to hold grow up through computer enhancement photos, as you see below.NOTE - actual photo at 3 months taken off a passport application, computer enhanced photos at aged 8, 10, 11 and 12Wilson had plenty to say Sunday. Although he thanked FBI for the work they're now doing, he's frustrated with the way his case was first handled by police.He believes police didn't take him seriously or try very hard to find his daughter because, even though he had court-ordered custody, he figures the popular thinking was "oh well, she's with her mother."Wilson believes a much greater effort would have been made if the roles were reversed and it was the non-custodial father who abducted the child from its mother.Wilson also worries what his daughter has been told by her mother all these years. He figures she's been brainwashed into thinking he's an unloving, uncaring man.I wonder how a mother could be so cruel. No doubt Tara Wilson loves her daughter. But how honest is that love when it comes the price of keeping a child from her father - who has done absolutely nothing wrong here, don't forget.Tara Wilson is the criminal. Dan Wilson is the victim. And so is Ashlyn Wilson.Dan Wilson said he's angry at Tara for what she's done but isn't out for vengeance. He just wants to meet his daughter, to tell her how hard he's been looking for her and how much he loves her.One thing Wilson will never get is the 13 years - and counting - that he has lost with her. Those can never be replaced. Now Wilson - and law enforcement - need your help. Tara Wilson is still believed to be in Canada. If you have any information on this case, please go to the following links and speak up. A computer enhanced photo of Tara Wilson has also been prepared.-MISSING CHILDREN'S SOCIETY OF CANADA-FBI-NATIONAL CENTRE FOR MISSING AND EXPLOITED CHILDREN-OREGON STATE POLICEFinally, here's an email I received from Dan Wilson late Sunday night following the show:Thank you so much for what you have done for me, and what you are doing for many others!!!Some more things I thought were important;Tara's family in Oregon cover story to their peers when they took Tara home was that "Tara was raped by a guy she knew from bible study". (Who would dare dispute such a story or ask further questions?) They totally avoided that Tara was engaged and that they knew me.Some years later when Tara's father Dr. Wilson was confronted in his office about Ashlyn, he denied having any grandchildren as none of his children were married.The means of Tara's being on the run and staying hidden are believed to be mostly from her family and facilitated by networks of Seventh Day Adventists who conduct "underground networks" to hide and provide for single mothers who are on the run.Tara has been and would likely be involved in:-Music performance or instruction in viola, piano, guitar, or other instruments;-Seventh Day Adventist Church, (Saturday worship, no work or commerce on sabbath friday night to saturday night);-Sign language;-Vegetarian;-Home school;-Horses;-Outdoor recreations;-Rural or isolated, self sufficient, secretive living;Tara would be a noticeable person; Very beautiful, Tall- about 6 foot, probably medium build, long blond hair, no cosmetics, no jewelery.Tara probably has many false identities, appearances / disguises and cover storiesIronic that the motives for Tara and her family are based in their pride of family position and reputation in their church, friends, family...In short it was too embarrassing to have a good Seventh Day Adventist daughter of theirs who chose to have sex before marriage. That would be immoral and a sin.But it is not immoral or a sin for them to;-lie about Tara being assaulted and raped,-lie about the existence of Ashlyn,-lie to law enforcement about whereabouts of Tara and Ashlyn and their role in hiding them,-break the law of the land and the rulings of the courts,-lie to anyone about anything to maintain the run,-lie to Ashlyn about her father,-keep a child (Ashlyn) from her father,-keep a father (me) from his daughter,-deprive their daughter and granddaughter of having anything like a normal life and opportunities,-put their daughter and granddaughter in the position of felony fugitive in hiding and taking away Tara and Ashlyn's ability to go to the police, hospital or other emergency services,-cause law enforcement agencies of county, state, national, international levels to spend uncountable amounts of money and time which could have helped others.The list of hypocricies goes on and on.Mike, again I want to tell you, but I cannot find words to convey how much it helps me and others that you are doing what you are doing. When I feel so helpless and anguished by the ineffective systems and my own limitations of time, money and abilities, to then have help from a stranger (YOU), makes me cry tears of gratitude which cannot be communicated with words!THANK YOU for all you are doing !Keep up the good work because you are helping other people to make the world a better place...not many things people can do that are more noble and truly great than that!God Bless You Mike!Sincerely,Dan WilsonFather of Ashlyn WilsonGot a comment on this case or the issues surrounding it? Post it below.
- HERE to read)The other involved a married couple who took in a couple of neglected horses - then made no effort to actually care for at least one of them. (Click HERE to read)The consistent theme that emerged in these unrelated cases is that there are people in this world who have no business owning an animal of any kind.Another is the lack of punishment that awaits these types of offenders.Sure, both couples were hit with substantial fines. But considering they are both deep in debt, what are the odds that money will actually be paid anytime soon?How about hitting people like this where it really hurts - and take away their freedom?I firmly believe anyone who could subject a helpless animal to such torment is capable of doing same to a fellow human. To me, that makes them a potential danger to society. So lock 'em up for a bit.Animal abuse laws in this country are sorely lacking. And we continue to see disturbing stories making headlines every week or so.Fortunately, all hope isn't lost. There are still plenty of caring people in this world.Ian Greaves is one such man. He e-mailed me this week after my reading the story on the puppy mill case. He had a most interesting - and heartwarming - story to share.In his words...Mike,I read with interest the article that you wrote "Puppy mill owners found guilty" online. I would like to tell you how I am personally and very indirectly involved with this story.As tragic in a sense of how those animals where treated, I want to tell you how something has come out of this very positive and made my family very happy.All the stars seem to have lined up straight for me and my family way back in May 2007. First of all, the dogs that were seized, were seized by a vet that worked for the provincial government that is a friend of ours.When these dogs where seized, they had to go to a places that could take care of them. Namely a place like Darcy's Animal Rescue Center on Portage Avenue.I guess some of these seized animals were beagles, bulldogs and three Wheaton Terriers. Of these Wheaton Terriers, one was a male and two were female.One of the Wheaton females was pregnant at the time. Hence move fast forward to the May long weekend of 2007. Getting together with my wife's family for a barbeque, my wife Shelley and her sister, Sharon, also Darcy's wife were talking about these Wheaton pups that weere coming to Darcy's animal shelter to be adopted.They had been seized from a puppy mill somewhere in southern Manitoba. My wife said to me, "Ian would you like a Wheaton Terrier puppy." I said "NO WAY".I then made the mistake of looking up this breed on the internet. I got suckered in.The pregnant female gave birth to a litter of 8 - 7 females and 1 male - at a foster home somewhere in or around Winnipeg.Hence, this is why I am writing you this email to tell you that we ended up getting one of these Wheaton puppies, that will soon be one year old on March 27. This dog has brought a great deal of happiness in this home. My three kids love the silly dog to death, my wife talks to it like it is going to reply and I kinda like it too. This family could not have asked for a better pet.A kind of happy note to this story don't you think.I have included a picture of Sheena our Wheaton Terrier that all of us just love.Best Regards,Ian Greaves
- HERE)Did she make the right call?Running out of gas when you're driving a car is, at worst, a major inconvenience. Running out of gas when you're flying a plane is, at best, a massive tragedy narrowly avoided.As most of you likely know, Tayfel took a chance with his fuel levels - and lost - while piloting a twin-engine plane in 2002.He then made a bad situation worse by failing to tell anyone on the ground about his problem until it was too late. He also put the lives of many other innocents at risk by flying into Winnipeg - then overshooting the runway. Tayfel somehow crash-landed at a busy city intersection, clipping a Transit bus and just missing several cars and pedestrians on the way down.Somehow Tayfel and six passengers survived. No one on the ground was hurt. Yet one elderly passenger, Chester Jones of Kansas, died of his injuries weeks later.Tayfel didn't own up to his mistake - at least not in a legal sense - and chose to fight his charges of criminal negligence at trial. He lost and was convicted.Crown attorney Brian Wilford told court Wednesday Tayfel deserves to be in jail.Although there are really no precedents for a case like this, Wilford says a strong message must be sent to Tayfel and all other pilots that this kind of reckless risk-taking will have serious consequences. And he says a community-based sentence doesn't send that message. Tayfel's lawyers disagreed, saying it wouldn't be right to send a good man to jail for making a mistake. He didn't deliberately crash his plane, they pointed out. And he came very close to dying himself, they noted.Tayfel's got plenty of support - from family members, friends and even those in the airline community.Personally, I've got mixed feelings on this one.On one hand, there's a long-held belief that jail should probably be reserved for dangerous and/or violent criminals. Tayfel clearly doesn't fit that description. Would putting him behind bars truly make society a safer place?But on the other hand, a life was lost here. Many more could have been. At what point does the background of the offender - however positive - take a backseat to the outcome of the crime?It's a tough call, and one I'm glad I didn't have to make.How about you? Post your thoughts below or click HERE to vote in my latest Jury Poll
- HERE. You can read an executive summary and highlights.I then encourage you to post your thoughts below.Does this change the way you think about youth crime? Did you find anything surprising here? (The fact most crime happens during weekdays was a shock to me). Does this leave you thinking more affordable community programming - and not just strong sentences - is part of the solution?
- My story - which ran in Tuesday's Free Press - focused largely on an exclusive interview with the parents of the 17-year-old now charged with criminal negligence causing death. (Click HERE to read)To recap, the two teens are accused of breaking into an inner-city garage and stealing a pellet gun they found laying around. Moments later, the gun accidentally went off and Shuya was shot in the eye, the pellet going straight into his brain. The older teen made sure 911 had been called, then took off.He lived with the secret of what had happened for several days, only coming forward with the truth after attending his friend's funeral.The case, while tragic, is not what has people upset.It's the suggestion from the accused's parents that the owner of the stolen pellet gun should, at the very least, share in the blame for what happened and possibly face criminal charges. (Read story HERE)They say the owner should know better then to leave a potentially lethal weapon laying around in a garage in a high-crime area. They say break-ins are frequent, and as such property owners must take extra care - presumably from people like their own son.This has the collective blood pressure of many readers rising. People are stunned that the parents of this accused criminal would actually suggest the victim of a break-in should be held accountable.Let's make one thing perfectly clear. My story should not be confused with my own personal opinion. It was a news story, not an editorial. Many people have accused me of suggesting the gun owner should be charged. I certainly haven't, nor would I.A few weeks ago, I wrote a story on a western Manitoba man who is charged with careless storage of a firearm. The facts are quite tragic. He legally owned several long guns but apparently didn't have trigger locks on at least one of them. (Click HERE to read)His 24-year-old son, following a fight with his ex-girlfriend, comes into the house one night when dad is away. The young man grabs the gun, points it as his head and pulls the trigger. He somehow survives the suicide bid. Police are called, begin an investigation and ultimately charged the father with the gun offence.I didn't get a single e-mail on that story from anyone suggesting the police were out of line to charge the father. That actually surprised me, given that I figured many people would see it as a case of kicking a man when he's down.But I wonder - if justice officials are going to charge the grieving father in that case, should the pellet gun owner face similar consequences?One major difference, of course, is the lack of regulations surrounding pellet guns.Perhaps a better comparison is auto theft.There have been suggestions in the past that people who fail to take proper care in protecting their cars from thieves should face charges if the vehicle is stolen and later used in a crime.So where do you stand? Should we all be held accountable if our action - or inaction - indirectly leads to a crime. Or is this just an absurd example of trying to deflect blame away from criminals who are already getting the kid glove treatment by the courts.Post your thoughts below. You can also visit my website at www.mikeoncrime.com to vote on our latest Jury Poll question.
- HERE)Her own mother is also charged in the slaying. The woman remains before the courts and is presumed innocent. Police and the Crown allege it was the mother who initiated the deadly incident by getting involved in a fight at a crackhouse, then calling her daughter and demanding she come over and save her.The teen - who can't be named under the Youth Criminal Justice Act - was given the maximum penalty of seven years. Four will be spent in custody. The remaining three under community supervision.Her lawyer, Greg Brodsky, told court the may as well have come "off an island or out of a bush" given her complete lack of understanding about what society considerns "normal."And he's right.That's not an excuse for what she did. It's simply a fact. And there are countless others like her out there, living in conditions we wouldn't wish on our worst enemies, being shown absolutely zero guidance in life and headed down the same dark, lonely road.Is this teen killer a lost cause? Perhaps. Brodsky says her prison sentence will hopefully give her a chance to be taught how to function in society.That seems like wishful thinking, as the place to be taught that kind of valuable life lesson would come in a safe, loving, nurturing home - not a jail.However, she has been accepted into a relatively new federal program that will include a very aggressive treatment plan. Her progress will be watched closely, which at least gives her a fighting chance.I know many of you reading this will have long ago cued the violins, figuring I'm just some bleeding heart who's bought into this girl's sob story hook, line and sinker.Only it's not a story. It's her reality. And a damn sad one at that.Let's not forget the victim of the killing, Kristi Hall, who did absolutely nothing to deserve her fate. It appears she was just in the wrong place at the wrong time and paid the ultimate price.But let's also not be foolish enough to think there was just one victim here. The 16-year-old killer is a victim, too. Her fate was seemingly sealed pretty much from the moment she entered this world.www.mikeoncrime.com
- blog, I'm currently working on my fourth true crime tale, which will chronicle the case of notorious Canadian sex offender Peter Whitmore.Devil Among Us: How Canada Failed To Stop Pedophile Peter Whitmore is slated for release in late fall.If you're on Facebook and want to join the group, simply click HERE. You'll be able to stay updated on my progress, fire away with questions about the content and writing process, debate the Whitmore case and issues surrounding it - and be first to know when Devil Among Us is completed and set to be released.Thanks for the interest, and support.-Mike
- So does the police will to bring her killer to justice, according to several sources.Yet despite identifying a suspect from day one - Rowbotham's husband, Mark Stobbe - the case remains stalled in investigative limbo.Stobbe, it should be noted, has always maintained his innocence. And while he is refusing to do interviews on the case, he is speaking through his Winnipeg lawyer. Tim Killeen told me again this week his client desperately wants to see his wife's killer caught. And that Stobbe will do anything he can to assist the investigation.It's not surprising to learn police have their eye on the spouse - that is fairly common in these types of murder cases. And often that suspicion proves to be well-founded.But is this, as Killeen has suggested, a case of police using "tunnel vision" and becoming so focused on one man that they become blinded to other potential suspects?Or is this a case of a "perfect murder" that will never be solved?Much of the intrigue surrounding this case involves the fact Stobbe held a high-ranking position with both the Saskatchewan, and then the Manitoba, governments. That has prompted police on at least one occassion to farm the case out to an out-of-province Crown attorney for opinion.Other talking points include the suicide of a lead investigator, a search of the Red River, reports of a shadowy figure on a bicycle, the repeated searches of the Rowbotham-Stobbe home, an attempt by insurance companies to avoid paying Stobbe, a subsequent lawsuit that was settled out of court and the revelation Rowbotham was killed in her own backyard - and not where her body was found.One of the frustrating aspects from a journalistic aspect is the difficulty in getting any type of official information or updates from the police.There are seemingly dozens of wild rumours and theories floating around about the mysterious circumstances surrounding Rowbotham's brutal 2000 slaying just north of Winnipeg.If even half of them were true this case would be the stuff of best-selling books and TV movies-of-the-week.We in the media aren't the only ones hearing them.The Rowbotham family have expressed numerous concerns about the status of the case, and actually supported a Winnipeg Free Press motion three years ago to unseal search warrant documents pertaining to the investigation in hope of shedding some new light.After a fairly lengthy legal battle, the newspaper won a partial victory and got access to partially edited copies which showed Stobbe was identified as the suspect. They also revealed DNA was found at the scene - from both Rowbotham and another source - and a warrant to seize a sample from Stobbe was obtained.So what became of that forensic evidence? We still don't know, as the portion of the search warrants which remained cloaked in secrecy dealt with this aspect of the case.Now, as the original sealing order expires, media outlets are renewing their fight to have the documents made public. Police are fighting the move, claiming the investigation is ongoing and could be compromised if the information comes to light. (Read story by clicking HERE)Yet with so much time having passed, you truly have to wonder if police are really making any progress - or just spinning their wheels.One thing is clear. Everybody in this case deserves answers - from the Rowbotham family, to Mark Stobbe himself.Let's hope they come soon.Do you agree the search warrants should be unsealed? Or is this an example of the media - and by extension the public - trying to stick its nose where it doesn't belong? Post your thoughts below.PS - in my next blog, I'll update you with some thoughts on another major Manitoba murder mystery that is dragging along.www.mikeoncrime.com
- Nowhere To Run: The Killing of Const. Dennis Strongquill (2003), The Yuletide Bandit: A Seven-Year Search For A Serial Criminal (2004), and To The Grave: Inside A Spectacular RCMP Sting (2006) have spent time on Canada’s bestsellers lists and have won praise from critics across the country.Devil Among Us will be published by Great Plains Publications this fall.For more information or to arrange an interview with the author please contact:Catharina de BakkerAssistant to the PublisherGreat Plains PublicationsOffice (204) 475-6799Fax (204) 475-0138Email email@example.comWeb www.greatplains.mb.ca
- "Nowhere To Run" during the summer/fall of 2003, I extended numerous offers to the Bell family to speak candidly about the young woman. Although a handful of distant relatives, along with numerous friends and associates, agreed to speak out, Laurie's inner circle of family refused. As did Laurie herself. That was certainly their right, but I always made it clear that they were missing out on a golden opportunity to share details on this troubled young woman's life.I would still welcome, now five years later, the opportunity to interview Laurie Bell and her family. That door still remains open.In the meantime, I will speak to the family in this forum, since they have chosen to initiate contact.*****Lynn,I feel the need to respond to your post.I'm happy to hear that Laurie Bell has apparently "grown and matured", as you write. Unfortunately, those words were not included in the National Parole Board report which, among other things, finds her to be an "undue risk" to commit a violent crime upon release from prison.I truly hope she has reformed - society is a much better place when convicted criminals are able to re-enter society and make a clean start of it.The recent story about Laurie's case was a summary of the concerns expressed by the NPB. Perhaps they will end up being unfounded. Only time will tell.But to suggest the story has been "fictionalized" is false.I think it is clear to everyone that Laurie Bell was convicted of manslaughter, not murder. (Otherwise, we certainly wouldn't even be talking about parole at this stage) The Crown's theory was that she played a much more active role in Dennis Strongquill's death. Jurors clearly rejected that theory, which was largely based on the testimony of a jailhouse informant. That has been reported, clearly and accurately, from day one.No doubt there are many people - Strongquill's family included - who believe Laurie "got away with murder". That is their right.I have no doubt Laurie has had a difficult time in prison. Contrary to what many Canadians think, jail is no holiday for most.Hopefully she has used her time behind bars wisely and the grim prognosis for her success proves to be a false alarm.I would happily write that story one day.In the meantime, I am very proud of the work I did on Nowhere To Run and certainly stand by it. I did not fictionalize any aspect of the story and believe Laurie Bell was presented in a fair and very accurate way, based on all the information that was available to me about her background.I've always believed - and stated in countless interviews - that I believe Laurie was a naive, impressionable young woman who was somewhat manipulated by the Sand brothers and got in way over her head. And I honestly believe the jury's verdict was a fair one - and the one I would have reached after hearing all the evidence against her.But I also strongly disagree with Laurie's claim to parole board officials that she's somehow gotten a bad deal here and done far more time for her crime than she deserves.The fact is, spending seven years in prison for her role in such a horrific killing should be considered a break.She's going to get her second chance. Dennis Strongquill never will.www.mikeoncrime.com
- As I report in Wednesday's Free Press, Bell will be given statutory release in mid-March after serving two-thirds of her sentence for manslaughter. Her co-accused ex-boyfriend, Robert Sand, continues to serve his life sentence for first-degree murder. Bell's release is coming with all kinds of controversy. And it certainly has brought up some memories for me, having written extensively about Bell and Sand in my 2003 true crime book "Nowhere To Run: The Killing of Const. Dennis Strongquill"She has been deemed a serious risk to re-offend, has refused to attend treatment programs behind bars, has been in numerous violent and sexual encounters with other inmates, has been caught using intoxicants while in custody and has displayed a lack of insight and remorse for her crimes, according to parole documents obtained this week.Other than that, she's a model inmate! (She also claims she "lights a candle" on the anniversary of Strongquill's death every year and has discovered the Muslim faith while behind bars)And yet despite all these warning signs, Bell is being sprung from prison with more than two full years remaining on her sentence - albeit with several special conditions imposed on her which hopefully reduces the risk to public safety.The National Parole Board says its hands are tied. And they're correct.That's because this is strictly the call of another government agency - the Correctional Service of Canada - who do have the ability to overrule the two-thirds release in exceptional cases and keep an inmate until their full sentence expires.But apparently Bell's crime and background doesn't meet their criteria and no such action is being taken.And so she will be allowed to resume her life, while the rest of society hopes and prays another innocent victim doesn't have to pay the ultimate price.Bell's release comes just weeks after a CSC review board publicly released some shocking figures about the large volume of inmates given statutory release - try two out of every three! - who re-offend. At least one in 10 commits a serious offence such as murder.Lovely.The board has also recommended the Conservative government scrap statutory release in favour of something called "earned parole", which would make it far more challenging for a criminal to get out after two-thirds.Of course, this would also require an estimated $70 million per year - over 10 years - in government funding for all the additional prison space that would be required.Will Laurie Bell's name soon be added to that statistic. Or will she surprise everyone and make a decent, law-abiding life for herself?Bell has reportedly claimed to prison officials she got a raw deal from the justice system, that her sentence was too long and that people who do far worse have gotten far less.I'm not sure which planet Bell lives on, but in my view doing just over seven years total for your role in killing an innocent, unsuspecting police officer qualifies as nothing short of a love tap from the justice system.I'd love to know where you stand on this.What do you think the odds are of Bell re-offending? Should statutory release be scrapped as the review board suggests? Should $700 million be spent on additional prison space? Should a person convicted of killing a police officer even be eligible for parole?Post your thoughts below. You can also click HERE to vote on this issue in my latest website jury poll.
- www.mikeoncrime.com and cast your vote on this issue in our latest JURY POLL question.
- HERE)The criminal case was eventually dropped by the Crown and the family reunited - but only after CFS briefly seized the child, the father was restricted for six months in seeing his daughter and also had to take a parenting course.The girl's mother says she took a hit as well, getting fired from her $30,000 per year job where she worked with local teens and also being forced to attend parenting 101.The father admits to hitting the girl with an open hand over her clothes "three or four" times because of her misbehaviour. The impact was apparently enough to cause bruising, which was spotted a couple days later by supervisors at the camp and reported to police.The father is upset because the Criminal Code actually allows parents to physically discipline their children. Section 43 permits a defence to assault for corporal punishment by a parent, teacher or guardian, provided the force is deemed reasonable.Police and justice officials apparently felt what happened here went beyond reasonable, at least in initially laying charges.But this entire case has certainly re-ignited the old debate about whether parents should ever lay a hand on their children.As I've stated before, one of the most common things I hear from people in their 60s and 70s when I do public speaking on crime and justice issues is how they wish the strap would be brought back to Canada.Many feel young people today are coddled too much and aren't being set straight before it's too late.That experience certainly differs from mine. I was never spanked as a child, have never spanked my own two children and don't believe inflicting physical pain actually solves anything.I've covered far too many cases where childhood victims of abuse - often at the hands of their parents - turn out to be abusers themselves.Bringing violence of any kind into the home seems to only encourage that vicious cycle to continue.I think one of the biggest problem with young people these days is the fact parents aren't spending enough quality time with their kids - if any at all. Of course, far too many children have no parental figure or role model in their lives, and the result is predictably sad.Many will call me a softie - or worse - for suggesting spanking won't solve anything. And I'm fine with that.I just believe a parent should lead by example and show your kids the right path in life - instead of just the back of your hand.www.mikeoncrime.com
About Mike McIntyre
Journalist, national radio show host, author, pundit and cruise director ... Mike McIntyre loves to keep busy.
Mike is the justice reporter for the Winnipeg Free Press, where he has worked since 1997. He produces and hosts the weekly talk radio show Crime and Punishment, which runs on the Corus Radio Network in several Canadian cities.
Born and bred in Winnipeg, Mike graduated from River East Collegiate and completed his journalism studies in the Creative Communications program at Red River College.
He and his wife, Chassity, have two children.
Ads by Google