Mary Agnes Welch joined the Free Press in 2002, first covering city hall and then the Manitoba legislature before moving to her current post as public policy reporter. Before Winnipeg, she worked at the Windsor Star and the Odessa American, a small daily newspaper in West Texas. There, in addition to covering more than 20 counties, she took high school football scores from coaches all over West Texas by phone every Friday night.
Mary Agnes is a graduate of Columbia University’s journalism school. She has been part of two teams of reporters nominated for a Michener Award. In 2011, 2012 and 2013 she was nominated for a National Newspaper Award in the beat category.
She was a Southam journalism fellow at the University of Toronto’s Massey College in 2012-13, where she studied indigenous issues, urban planning and political science. She is also the former national president of the Canadian Association of Journalists and has served on several boards.
She once misspelled "Shih Tzu" in the paper and received 37 emails from angry dog-owners.
It's been a season of fun nominations and tonight could be the mack daddy. New Democrats will gather at Club Regent for what's already been a fairly petty battle for the party's nod in the federal riding of Elmwood-Transcona.
That's the riding held for decades by NDP elder statesman Bill Blaikie. The party lost it, embarrassingly, to Lawrence Toet's Tories in 2011 and hopes to recapture it next year. Seeking the nom is rogue MLA Jim Maloway, who made a brief leap to Ottawa and then lost to Toet, and Daniel Blaikie, son of Bill. Also running is lawyer Chad Panting, who is relatively unknown to Dippers in the riding but who appears confident of victory tonight.
Over the weekend, both Maloway and Panting sent out somewhat combative emails to members, fueling the perception the riding's NDP politics tend toward the childish.
Panting styles himself as "the only candidate to insure Victory 2015." In his email blast, Panting took swipes at Maloway for losing the constituency in 2011 and accused Blaikie of riding his father's coattails and being "worthy of being included in the dictionary under 'status-quo'." Panting has, in the past, also taken issue with the media calling Blaikie an electrician when he is not yet a journeyman.
Maloway also sent out some cryptic emails to members -- links to short stories about his departure, and the Wikipedia entries, cut and pasted without comment, for his 2011 election result and Rebecca Blakie's result in Winnipeg North that same year. The juxtaposition was either meant to remind area New Democrats that a Blaikie can't win (Rebecca is Daniel's older sister) or designed to reinforce the notion that Daniel is the party establishment's choice (Rebecca is national party president and Quebec campaign director.)
The emails, combined with Maloway's use of his MLA mailing privileges to send flyers throughout the federal riding, has prompted some frustrated fist-shaking among New Dems in the neighbourhood.
Despite this nonsense, and as much as many would like to see the back of Maloway, he should not be underestimated. He whips up support using relentlessly parochial issues such as Plessis Road, manages his memberships effectively, maneuvers supporters onto his riding association board and is fired up by an us-against-them mentality.
It is also not clear Blaikie has done what needs doing to defeat Maloway, and may be relying too much on the considerable cachet of his name. One New Dem told me a Maloway victory tonight would not be a surprise, even though local party members are growing increasingly tired of the veteran politician's antics.
It’s always heartening when independent research confirms the reasonableness of one’s frequent desire to use one’s pile of FOI rejection letters to start a small bonfire in the parking lot and dance around it naked until someone calls 911.
That’s what happened today with the release of Newspapers Canada’s tenth annual freedom of information audit. This year, the audit focused on data, the reams of information kept by government that are supposed to make it smarter and more efficient and that can help us hold them to account.
Researchers, led by University of King’s College journalism professor Fred Vallance-Jones, fired off the same access to information requests for databases and documents to governments across Canada and then compared the results.
Manitoba and Winnipeg did crappy. Here are the highlights:
That sounds familiar. Often, my denial letters from the province are longer than the actual documents I asked for.
Manitoba would also not release a full list of government employees or complete details about deputy ministerial travel.
Governments never want you to fiddle with data because that's how you might find out they suck, so they release long lists of information in a form that entirely thwarts all attempts to actually analyze it. That frequently happens here, but it’s no relief to know we’re not alone.
Manitoba Infrastructure and Transportation denied a request for data about bridge repair and inspections, saying it would need to print out the database and then take a black pen to it to censor the private stuff. What’s private about bridge maintenance is a mystery, but whatever.
Same with Manitoba Justice, which I find the most obstinate department to deal with. It said it could not reasonably produce a database of inmate complaints. Doing so would mean manually going through the individual files of 2,400 inmates.
I have often heard the province's database software is among the most outdated in Canada, so, even if a culture of openness prevailed (it doesn't), it would be thwarted by terrible technology.
The police did well in releasing overtime information. But then the city wanted to charge $26,000 - the cost of a very nice Toyota Corolla, noted the report - for property inspection orders.
Even if someone had deep pockets, I know from past requests the city will not release the most important part of inspection orders - the address of the property at fault. Despite much arguing, Manitoba's ombudsman sides with the city on that, that releasing the address of a filthy or dangerous property is a privacy violation. That’s despite the fact that other cities, such as Saskatoon, Moncton and St. John's released the information in full.
Why does this matter?
This is not just a bunch of self-important reporters asking for data to be annoying. The information government keeps belongs to its citizens, and we have a right to see nearly all of it.
Openness makes government better and more efficient. It allows entrepreneurs to do cool stuff with data that government can’t even imagine. And it allows citizens to really see for themselves whether their elected officials are doing what they promised.
Openness is fundamental to a functioning democracy, and it’s eroding.
Sen. JoAnne Buth resigned today. I was channel-surfing before heading in to work the night shift, and I learned this from a screen crawl on CBC News Network. It did not occur to me until about an hour later that Buth might be one of Manitoba's senators and this might be of local interest.
After I alerted my boss, he said we probably just wanted a shortie, a brief. Not really that interesting, he said. I was slightly indignant. She's one of Manitoba's constitutionally-guaranteed voices in the upper chamber! Her resignation matters! This leaves Manitoba with half its Senate seats vacant!
As I drove in to work, I began to reconsidered this. Since Prime Minister Stephen Harper appointed her more than two years ago, she has not been quoted once in the Free Press, not even when I canvassed all four sitting senators to find out what they thought about the Wallin-Duffy-Brazeau scandal. An entomologist by training, Buth has deep roots in agriculture. But she was never quoted by the Manitoba Co-operator either. I have never seen her at any political events, not even lame photo ops. I have never heard any gossip or intel about her. I know of no issues she championed or causes she backed. We aren't even absolutely sure how to pronounce her name.
Though I'm sure she is a very nice and capable person, she was, like most senators, an invisible member of a irrelevant and disgraced institution. A shortie was probably all her two years in the Senate deserved.