Winnipeg Free Press - ONLINE EDITION

Thoughts on Gay-gate

  • Print

Stu Murray, the former head of the provincial Tories and the new boss of the Canadian Human Rights Museum is having a rough start in his new job. He's come under fire from gay and lesbian groups for voting against extending adoption rights back in the day, and not having a particularly well-prepared explanation for how that jibes with being an international advocate for human rights. In a speedy bit of damage control, it sounds like Murray and the human rights museum folks are meeting ASAP with anyone remotely gay to smooth things over, as well they should.

I think Murray made it pretty clear then and now that he personally supports gay rights -- though, in a nifty interview by CBC Radio's Margaux Watt the other day, he refused to say how he'd vote if he had the chance again today. But the whole episode makes me think three things:

  1. Murray was not well briefed. He should have had a clever and decisive reply to the gay rights question, because it was inevitable. And he should have had a better answer to the "what experience do you have in the human rights field" question. His answer to that one amounted to: I lived near a reserve and went to Israel once.
  2. When it comes right down to it, Murray got into this pickle not because he doesn't know what's right but because he didn't lead. He personally favoured gay rights but caved to the rest of his more conservative caucus and party base that didn't. Instead, he should have recognized, as most governments and courts in Canada had started to, that gay rights are not only laid out in the Charter but, politically, voting against them doesn't help establish you as anything other than a backwater party with no hope of winning in Winnipeg. Murray should have whipped his caucus, the way one imagines Doer does on issues that matter. If he couldn't manage that, how is he going to manage when the Turks are REALLY MAD about a exhibit on the Armenian genocide?
  3. If any New Democrats out there are taking any glee in this whole debacle, I'd like to remind you of your party's mealy-mouthed record on gay rights. You only extended pension and death benefits to gays because the Supreme Court told you to. You only let gays adopt because you got an avalanche of criticism from inside and outside your party (and reportedly, a threat by openly-gay cabinet minister Jim Rondeau to resign). So no gloating.

Fact Check

Fact Check

Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories?
Please use the form below and let us know.

* Required
  • Please post the headline of the story or the title of the video with the error.

  • Please post exactly what was wrong with the story.

  • Please indicate your source for the correct information.

  • Yes

    No

  • This will only be used to contact you if we have a question about your submission, it will not be used to identify you or be published.

  • Cancel

Having problems with the form?

Contact Us Directly
  • Print

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.

Have Your Say

New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?

Have Your Say

Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?

The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.