25°c Partly cloudy
18°c Cloudy periods
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Australians chafe against cotton-woollen age
Australian men once routinely referred to their closest friend as "an old bastard" in the confident knowledge his mate would never accuse him of being insensitive, or even inaccurate.
Being born outside wedlock even a mere 40 years ago still carried serious social stigma.
But such a potentially inflammatory insult was received in the affectionate spirit in which it was delivered and there's no record of a recipient seeking compensation, or a court-ordered apology.
Australia's federal Parliament is expected to soon pass legislation many suggest will make it illegal to diminish or demean our fellow human beings.
Not even the most rabid opponents of proposed new anti-discrimination laws (still in draft form) suggest they'll make outlaws of two aging Australians insulting one another in the front bar of their local pub.
But there are credible suggestions Australia, one of the few western democracies without a bill of rights, is moving toward a new cotton-woollen age where the government plays nanny in the national nursery.
Mark Dreyfus, a federal cabinet secretary in the ruling Labour government connected with the framing of the legislation, says there's nothing to be afraid of.
"It's not going to be illegal to insult or offend anyone,'' he told the ABC current affairs show The 7.30 Report.
Dreyfus said the new laws would do little more than consolidate five existing acts to give a more coherent legal framework to Australia's anti-discrimination law.
While Sec. 19 of the proposed act defines discrimination as behaviour that offends, insults or discriminates, the law would do nothing more than defend the most vulnerable against brutal verbal attack, he said.
He offered up the scenario of a woman constantly harassed by a boss who demeans and denigrates her on a daily basis.
"They are designed to give protection against a women who has a superior who says, 'You are useless, you are just a woman, what would you know.' ''
Opposition MP George Brandis, a highly credentialed lawyer, believes something far more sinister than the protection of the vulnerable is underway.
He identifies a new definition of what constitutes discrimination residing in the new laws, which include bans on insulting someone based on political opinion or social origins.
"I think we should have a zero-tolerance approach toward laws, which tell us what we may say or what we may not say in political discussion,' he said.
Sen. Brandis says the Australian Liberal/National Party Opposition is strongly against imposing moral, political or cultural censorship where an expression of an opinion can lead you into a courtroom.
Oddly enough, the new laws may yet hold up the rights of religious organizations to maintain their own brand of discrimination against those who don't match their view of the world.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard, whose de facto relationship with her live-in partner could possibly preclude her from employment at a Christian school, says the nation should remain calm while the framework of the laws is hammered out.
She says the laws are only in a draft form.
"We'll get the feedback and we'll consider it,'' she says.
Michael Madigan is the Winnipeg Free Press correspondent in Australia. He writes mostly about politics for the Brisbane-based Courier Mail.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 25, 2013 A13
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 7 articles for today)
At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
1:00 AM 0I turn 55 this week.
I'd never considered the possibility of the palindrome or, if I had, I attached the word ...
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Blue offence must make teams pay for blitzing Buck
- Mack, Burke give each other room to do their jobs
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Boyfriend's right; you should wait
- Bark in the park more than a lark
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Just for kicks: shoe swap hits town
- Fiasco fixers
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- What a knockout!
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Your new 'friends' have unlocked a mystery
- Discovering your wife's kinky behaviour isn't an invitation to join the party
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Ground control to Major Chris
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Fiasco fixers
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Katz bogeys again
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- From tram station to office building
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Don’t do dysfunction
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Take a walk in the park to fight prostate cancer
- Psychics pull off a little magic
- Fiasco fixers
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- Helping others despite the cost
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- When the Ford jokes stop
- St. Norbert sees condo boom
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Lessons learned in 4-H last a lifetime
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Ground control to Major Chris
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.