Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Australians chafe against cotton-woollen age
Australian men once routinely referred to their closest friend as "an old bastard" in the confident knowledge his mate would never accuse him of being insensitive, or even inaccurate.
Being born outside wedlock even a mere 40 years ago still carried serious social stigma.
But such a potentially inflammatory insult was received in the affectionate spirit in which it was delivered and there's no record of a recipient seeking compensation, or a court-ordered apology.
Australia's federal Parliament is expected to soon pass legislation many suggest will make it illegal to diminish or demean our fellow human beings.
Not even the most rabid opponents of proposed new anti-discrimination laws (still in draft form) suggest they'll make outlaws of two aging Australians insulting one another in the front bar of their local pub.
But there are credible suggestions Australia, one of the few western democracies without a bill of rights, is moving toward a new cotton-woollen age where the government plays nanny in the national nursery.
Mark Dreyfus, a federal cabinet secretary in the ruling Labour government connected with the framing of the legislation, says there's nothing to be afraid of.
"It's not going to be illegal to insult or offend anyone,'' he told the ABC current affairs show The 7.30 Report.
Dreyfus said the new laws would do little more than consolidate five existing acts to give a more coherent legal framework to Australia's anti-discrimination law.
While Sec. 19 of the proposed act defines discrimination as behaviour that offends, insults or discriminates, the law would do nothing more than defend the most vulnerable against brutal verbal attack, he said.
He offered up the scenario of a woman constantly harassed by a boss who demeans and denigrates her on a daily basis.
"They are designed to give protection against a women who has a superior who says, 'You are useless, you are just a woman, what would you know.' ''
Opposition MP George Brandis, a highly credentialed lawyer, believes something far more sinister than the protection of the vulnerable is underway.
He identifies a new definition of what constitutes discrimination residing in the new laws, which include bans on insulting someone based on political opinion or social origins.
"I think we should have a zero-tolerance approach toward laws, which tell us what we may say or what we may not say in political discussion,' he said.
Sen. Brandis says the Australian Liberal/National Party Opposition is strongly against imposing moral, political or cultural censorship where an expression of an opinion can lead you into a courtroom.
Oddly enough, the new laws may yet hold up the rights of religious organizations to maintain their own brand of discrimination against those who don't match their view of the world.
Prime Minister Julia Gillard, whose de facto relationship with her live-in partner could possibly preclude her from employment at a Christian school, says the nation should remain calm while the framework of the laws is hammered out.
She says the laws are only in a draft form.
"We'll get the feedback and we'll consider it,'' she says.
Michael Madigan is the Winnipeg Free Press correspondent in Australia. He writes mostly about politics for the Brisbane-based Courier Mail.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition January 25, 2013 A13
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 5 articles for today)
To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
1:00 AM 0Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Negotiate deal with your wife that works for both of you
- Vigneault will be a man in demand
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- You can bet the farm on housebarns
- Buck 'goes long' for Winnipeg
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Don't wear yourself out trying to win her back
- Blame ad by mayor, deputy for jeopardizing money-saver
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Katz bogeys again
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- Tell husband you're not talking to her... maybe tell him why
- Tell the building manager and the peep show will end
- Vigneault will be a man in demand
- Big Blue will have one helluva punter
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Goodbye, Susan; a privilege to know you
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Beloved piece of Winnipeg's music history deserves better
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- Katz bogeys again
- Dugouts could change the game
- Winter is coming
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Not much fun at this Carnaval
- You can bet the farm on housebarns
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Tick season means pets at risk of Lyme disease
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Not much fun at this Carnaval
- Mount Carmel Clinic: An oasis of acceptance in a judgmental world
- Katz bogeys again
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Granddaddy of the mock doc takes to TV
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Dugouts could change the game
- Happily selling shoes at age 89
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Selinger's ability to sell case weak link in tax-hike plan
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.