11°c Partly cloudy
8°c Light rain
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Battling Ontario for immigrants
Ottawa placing strict limits on nominee program
It's Ottawa's version of gladiator games, with the provinces all thrown together into a single arena to see which one will emerge victorious.
The battle is over the suddenly fashionable provincial nominee immigration program, which several provinces, Manitoba among them, have used to boost populations and fill holes in their labour markets. Unfortunately, Ottawa, which has concerns about the way some provinces are administering the program, is refusing to increase the total number of provincial nominees. Ottawa is also making the requirements for admission more stringent. In particular, the federal government wants to see more emphasis on English- or French-language proficiency.
Chetima Mamadou Mai Moussa is among many newcomers to Manitoba. (MIKE DEAL / WINNIPEG FREE PRESS ARCHIVES )
Census 2011
-
Explore the numbers and see how different regions of Canada compare and have changed since the last census in 2006.
-
Census 2011 makes history: population in the West surpasses that in the East
-
Census winners and losers: which cities gained and lost the most population?
-
Immigration dominates population growth as Canadian families keep shrinking
-
Country living continues to decline as majority of Canadians live in big cities
The timing of Ottawa's stinginess couldn't be worse, as there is increasing demand for provincial nominees, both by provinces such as Manitoba that have used it to spur economic growth, and by provinces such as Ontario that have largely ignored the program but now desperately need population growth to restart their economies.
Ontario has been particularly slow to embrace provincial nominees. For so long, Ontario effortlessly attracted the lion's share of Canada's annual quota of immigrants, as much as 60 per cent of the total number admitted in any one year. However, the latest batch of census data shows Ontario, still reeling from the recession, is not the destination of choice it once was. Ontario's population is still growing but at a lower rate than the West. And it is attracting a smaller share of total immigration, a major concern as the province struggles to stoke its economy.
All that has put a spotlight on the provincial nominee program and the gains smaller provinces have made. Consider that last year, Manitoba admitted about 12,000 provincial nominees, while Ontario only had about 1,000. Ontario officials claim that is evidence smaller provinces are stealing immigrants from Ontario. The smaller provinces can only giggle about that allegation, even though they are concerned about Ontario gobbling up the lion's share of the program.
The real irony here is the provincial nominee program was introduced as a way of balancing the settlement of immigrants by diverting more new Canadians to smaller, less desirable provinces. Before this program was in effect, the overwhelming majority of immigrants went to Toronto, Vancouver and Montreal. Provincial nominees, which allow the provinces to directly recruit immigrants with specific job skills to fill gaps in the labour market, seemed to be the answer.
Smaller provinces were permitted to recruit immigrants with specific skill sets to fill specific jobs. The real enticement was individual provinces could recruit immigrants who normally would not normally qualify for admission under the skilled-worker program.
Despite early concerns provincial nominees would become nothing more than a drain on social programs, or they would simply land in Regina or Winnipeg and then just flee to Toronto or Vancouver, the provincial nominee program did what it said it would do, which is grow the population and economies of smaller provinces.
There wouldn't be a need for the provinces to duke it out if Ottawa were simply willing to increase the total number of provincial nominees it admits each year. Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has so far turned aside those demands.
The fly in the provincial nominee ointment, so to speak, has been a series of crimes and misdemeanours committed by provincial nominee Atlantic provinces. Prince Edward Island, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia have all suffered through various scandals associated with their versions of the program, with allegations of payola, corruption and misuse of funds and the accompanying condemnation by provincial auditors general. The question here is whether this is evidence the program itself is flawed, or just the political culture of the provinces that tried to mess it up?
For some years now, total immigration has been capped at 250,000 annually. The pressure from provinces to expand the provincial nominee program can only be accomplished if the Conservative government can accept the notion of raising the cap on total immigration. That seems like a real long shot, for now.
A more likely scenario is the provinces will be encouraged to battle each other for a single provincial nominee pie. In that battle, smaller provinces such as Manitoba will have to somehow perform like David against the increasingly assertive Goliath that is Ontario. With greater numbers of MPs and thus political weight to wield in the Conservative government, the early odds tell us to take the big fella.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 9, 2012 $sourceSection0
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
Poll
Proudly brought to you by:
Most Popular Columnists
- No warning, consultation sounds like a city move
- Just treatment for mentally ill offenders an old idea
- Nani bringing skills to Manitoba
- Who is really getting railroaded?
- A life much too short won't be forgotten
- Penner's in a good place
- Time for you to make a stink over smelly co-worker
- Enjoy winter? Sorry, that's not in the budget
- His life made our world a better place
- Former Goldeyes star tried to take his life, but instead decided to face challenges head on
- Leaders refuse to give up on plan to improve ugly stretch of Route 90
- Good things come in small packages
- His life made our world a better place
- It's a 'disease,' the studies agree
- Jets could be greatly affected by deal
- Take a page from the European playbook
- Shy, kind and soft-spoken -- with the power to infuriate
- Strong growth in rural retail
- For Tim's mother, the issue is safety
- Football owes players some medical answers
- If we build it, look out
- Common courtesy decreasingly common
- Leaders refuse to give up on plan to improve ugly stretch of Route 90
- Majumder surprisingly frank -- and funny -- in HBO special
- Empty inside
- Katz versus Ford
- Can't share a vision when no one asks
- Some can't afford humane thing to do
- 'A special kind of sad'
- Riding changes could make Green blue
- His life made our world a better place
- Kelvin's Blossom Boys back for 100th anniversary
- Rob Lowe shooting Casey Anthony story here
- English language rules the world
- It's a 'disease,' the studies agree
- His life made our world a better place
- English language rules the world
- Strong growth in rural retail
- Long haul 'family' Every employee is a spoke in the wheel at Bison Transport
- Gluten-free doesn't mean bad taste
- Try cheese toast, caesar dressing at Like Hy's
- Where's our piece of N.D. oil boom?
- Rob Lowe shooting Casey Anthony story here
- Starring role in playoffs is payback for Zajac
- It's a 'disease,' the studies agree
- The birth of a banana republic
- His life made our world a better place
- Rail firm looks to grain
- Play's the thing to catch conscience of Parliament
- Hope turns to dust in Niger
- The prince and the paper
- You've got a Target? We're in
- 'A special kind of sad'
- Common courtesy decreasingly common
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010; View the changes. New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.