Columnists

Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION

Big bucks to be made in taxis

Licences fetching huge dollars as board OK's 20-cent hike in fares' initial charge

By: Martin Cash

3/12/2009 1:00 AM | Comments: 3

JOHN WOODS / CANADIAN PRESS ARCHIVES Enlarge Image

Investors would have done well putting their money in the stock market this year.

But they would have done even better buying Winnipeg taxi licences.

Since the beginning of the year, the going price for a taxi "medallion" has increased by 61 per cent, with a couple of recent transactions closing at a whopping $412,000.

The poor punters investing in the TSX had to be satisfied with 47 per cent gains this year.

Prices for taxi licences have skyrocketed since a consultant's report issued in February found the city was adequately served by 410 standard taxis, the same number that have been working the streets of Winnipeg for about 10 years.

Industry officials say some of the new investment in licences comes from India, where investors recognize the tidy returns to be had in a business that employs many non-resident Indians in Winnipeg.

On Wednesday, the Manitoba Taxicab Board agreed to a 20 cent increase in the initial charge or "drop fee" of a taxi fare.

That makes it about the 10th fare increase this decade. At the beginning of the decade, it cost $2.70 to get into a cab.

Starting April 1, 2010, it will cost $3.50.

That may not sound like much, but considering the recent overheated debate about the relative need for more taxis in the city and the subsequent spike in the price of Winnipeg taxi licences, it raises interesting questions about the manner in which the taxi business is regulated in the city.

The new increase, applied for by the two large taxi co-operatives, Unicity and Duffy's -- which control 93 per cent of the standard taxi licences -- is ostensibly meant to defray the costs of installing new models of security cameras the Taxicab Board decided must replace the older models that have become unreliable.

(The actual application was for a 30-cent increase.)

While the Taxicab Board approved a 20-cent increase, it limited it to an 11-month time frame from April 1, 2010, to Feb. 28, 2011.

Let's see if prices actually do come down.

The last time a temporary fare increase was approved, it became a permanent one.

Barry Prentice and Charles Mossman, a couple of member of the U of M's Asper School of Business faculty, took the occasion of the rate increase application to weigh in to the debate on how this regulated monopoly works.

Prentice, a prominent transportation economist, was at the vanguard of the deregulation of the trucking industry in the late '80s.

He has expressed his support of market forces countless times over the years.

He does not mince words.

"Where is the social policy of all this?" he said in an interview. "Why do we create a regulated cartel to charge high prices and control and reduce supply. Whose interest is that in? Does it serve the 410 taxi owners or the 650,000 people living in Winnipeg?"

Their submission presents a formula on the capitalized value of the licences. It suggests the medallion values "are an estimate of how much beyond the normal modest profits are being earned in the industry, because that is the amount new entrants are willing to pay for the opportunity to earn those returns."

For instance, a $350,000 licence multiplied by the going interest rate of, say, five per cent means there is $17,500 in excess profits over and above the modest profits and costs of operating a taxi. They argue that if the excess revenue were not there, the new entrants would not be able to afford the investment required to buy the licence.

"Licence values should never have been allowed to come up this high in price," Prentice said. "It tells us the benefits of the cartel is excessive."

With so few players in the business, it is not surprising the board would appeal to the big co-ops on operational issues.

It now also has the former general manager of Unicity on its payroll as its chief inspector.

martin.cash@freepress.mb.ca

Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition December 3, 2009 B6

Rate this
This article is currently rated an average of 5 out of 5 (1 votes).

We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high. If you thought it was well written, do the same. If it doesn’t meet your standards, mark it accordingly.

You can also register and/or login to the site and join the conversation by leaving a comment.

Rate it yourself by rolling over the stars and clicking when you reach your desired rating. We want you to tell us what you think of our articles. If the story moves you, compels you to act or tells you something you didn’t know, mark it high.

3 Comments

Posted by: second thought

December 3, 2009 at 10:37 AM

How on earth can they figure that we don't need any more taxis today then we did 10 years ago?

Report abusive comment

Posted by: cherenkov

December 3, 2009 at 9:10 AM

Barry Prentice is bang-on. The extremely high prices for cab licenses is proof that the model is broken, and that there are too few cabs on the road. There is absolutely no reason for this industry to be regulated at all, except for basic requirements related to safety.

However, the longer you wait to deregulate the more difficult it will be, because so many cab owners have large sums of money invested in licenses. The government would likely have to compensate those owners at the cost of millions of dollars to the taxpayer if it were to deregulate. The gov't and the PUB need to get this under control now.

Report abusive comment

Posted by: MyOpinion

December 3, 2009 at 8:03 AM

I rarely ever take a taxi because the price is too high. I also don't see why its a regulated industry. If I want to operate a taxi cab I should be able too.

And I believe its the same with buses. Sometime ago, if you wanted to operate a bus service. Why because it might cut into the profits of transit. For example, if during the summer I wanted to hire a company to drive my child back and forth to an activity there are stringent rules. At that time, when I was working I couldn't hire the company (and if I remember right) its because it was to close to home and I was taking business away from transit. But transit wouldn't escort my child back and forth, so how was I taking business away from transit.

People should be able to operate any legal business they want. Yes there should be rules and regulations, but not to protect a company or public sector. This just leads to gouging of the public.