Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Cellphone ban doesn't impact collision rate
Here's a question I never thought I'd ask: Does banning cellphone use while driving lower the number of overall collisions?
And here's an answer I never thought I'd give: Maybe not as much as we would like to think.
A study by the Massachusetts Institute of Technology was originally reported online earlier this month in Accident Analysis & Prevention, and appeared in Monday's Boston Globe, which is where I came across it.
Essentially, this is what the MIT study concluded: You can take cells away from people who frequently use them while driving, but you can't stop their inherent tendency to drive in other risky ways.
"The people who are more willing to frequently engage in cellphone use are higher-risk drivers, independent of the phone," Bryan Reimer, associate director of MIT's New England University Transportation Center, told the Globe. "It's not just a subtle difference with those willing to pick up the phone," he added. "This is a big difference."
The subtext, which wasn't explicitly stated, is if these drivers don't kill people because they're on their cellphones, they'll do it driving in some other dangerous or distracted way.
The findings were based on the habits of 108 drivers from Greater Boston, half of whom confessed to frequently using cellphones while driving and half of whom said they did that rarely.
Researchers found frequent cell users drove faster, changed lanes more often, spent more time in the left lane and tended to do more hard-braking and rapid accelerating. More specifically, frequent users -- sounds like a term for a drug addict doesn't it? -- on average travelled 4.4 kilometres per hour faster and changed lanes twice as often as rare users.
No one, least of all me, is disputing how dangerous it is to use a cellphone while driving. According to the Boston Globe story, America's National Safety Council estimates about one in five of the 5.4 million car crashes in the U.S. during 2010 involved drivers who were talking on their cellphones. Another 160,000 are estimated to have involved drivers texting.
Here's what's perplexing about those findings.
Private insurance companies have not seen an overall increase in traffic collisions despite the growing numbers of drivers and soaring popularity of cellphones. In the U.S., there hasn't been a noticeable drop in accidents even though 39 U.S. states have banned texting while driving, and 10 have made it illegal to talk on the phone while operating a vehicle.
"We have not seen that those bans have reduced crashes," Adrian Lund, president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in Arlington, Va., bluntly told the Globe.
That's why Lund and others don't see how cellphone laws help.
Manitoba Public Insurance takes its direction from the province, so you won't hear that from them. What they do agree on is this:
"MPI has no evidence locally that traffic accidents are up since the use of cellphones," said corporation spokesman Brian Smiley.
In fact, despite there being more drivers on Manitoba roads every year and the near addictive nature of cellphone use, the number of traffic collisions in the province has decreased over the last decade. Particularly between 2007 and 2010. Manitoba banned cell use while driving halfway through 2010.
Nevertheless, people are dying because of distracted drivers.
"Be it texting while driving," Smiley said, "talking on the cellphone, animated conversation with passengers, trying to pick up CDs off the floor, eating while driving. These are all considered forms of distracted driving."
But it's cellphone use that's illegal here. And, as the Boston-area study suggests, it's not cell phones in cars that kill people -- it's people and their selfish, dangerous attitudes.
That doesn't mean we don't need a law banning cellphone use in cars.
What's missing is more common sense and, of course, more enforcement and even stiffer penalties. That still might not make a difference in the overall numbers of accidents each year, but it will make me feel better. And, down the road, it may do what no study can determine.
Save the life of someone you love.
gordon.sinclair@freepress.mb.ca
Crashes were already down
DESPITE the increase in the number of drivers and the use of cellphones, the number of traffic collisions in the province has decreased in Manitoba over the last decade. Here are the numbers:
Year / Collisions / Active drivers
2010* 27,172 767,222
2009 26,578 754,485
2008 29,092 744,049
2007 29,494 728,047
2006 31,738 703,051
2005 33,164 695,091
2004 35,002 690,568
2003 34,771 683,060
2002 31,983 679,219
2001 30,999 674,921
* The banning of hand-held devices in Manitoba came into law in May 2010
-- source: Manitoba Public Insurance
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition August 28, 2012 B1
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 13 articles for today)
Yep, new stadium a beauty all right
1:00 AM 0Back in 2006 at the last Grey Cup this city hosted, lots of out-of-town guests were badmouthing our football stadium. ...
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Ground control to major Chris
- Yep, new stadium a beauty all right
- Chewing out the mayor's poor attitude
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- LGBT community reflects as Pride rises
- Vigneault will be a man in demand
- You can bet the farm on housebarns
- Differing dollars
- Negotiate deal with your wife that works for both of you
- Beauty and the beast
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Katz bogeys again
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- Tell husband you're not talking to her... maybe tell him why
- Tell the building manager and the peep show will end
- Vigneault will be a man in demand
- Big Blue will have one helluva punter
- Ground control to major Chris
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Beloved piece of Winnipeg's music history deserves better
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- Katz bogeys again
- Dugouts could change the game
- Winter is coming
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Not much fun at this Carnaval
- You can bet the farm on housebarns
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Tick season means pets at risk of Lyme disease
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Not much fun at this Carnaval
- Katz bogeys again
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Tapping sweetness from birch trees
- More than a new boss
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Dugouts could change the game
- Happily selling shoes at age 89
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Selinger's ability to sell case weak link in tax-hike plan
Ads by Google











You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.