24°c Partly cloudy
25°c Chance of thundershowers
Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Chiefs' opposition to name ban appalling
The Canadian Press archives Karl McKay�s ex-wife reported the abuse of Phoenix Sinclair to CFS. (CP)
The Assembly of Manitoba Chiefs and the Southern Chiefs Organization (SCO) have thrown another wrench into the proceedings of the Phoenix Sinclair inquiry, further delaying the beleaguered look into the circumstances surrounding the five-year-old's murder.
The two organizations oppose a publication ban on the names of Karl Wesley McKay's ex-wife and three children, expected to testify at the inquiry.
McKay, along with Phoenix's mother Samantha Kematch, tortured and eventually killed the child in 2005. Her body was found in 2006.
The inquiry was supposed to start hearing evidence again on Monday. That's been pushed back a week.
The Free Press is not opposing the publication ban.
McKay's ex-wife also wants to be designated a Source of Referral (SOR), further protecting her identity. A number of individuals have already testified as SORs.
In her affidavit, she says she was bullied and harassed after McKay was arrested for killing Phoenix. She was worried she'd face retribution for her testimony at the criminal trial.
"I have serious concerns that I may suffer physical harm if my identity is disclosed by virtue of my testimony at the inquiry,' she said.
"I am currently employed. No one at my place of employment is aware of my relationship to Wes McKay. I have serious concerns that if my co-workers and supervisors became aware of my relationship to Wes McKay, that I would suffer serious consequences ranging from verbal harassment to possible physical harassment to the loss of my employment."
Commission chairman Ted Hughes reluctantly granted the delay, making it clear he wants every effort made to get the inquiry back on schedule. He was unhappy with AMC and SCO lawyer Jay Funke's request for a delay because Funke and his associate are on holiday.
Intertribal CFS lawyer Hafeez Khan filed a motion to allow him to cross-examine McKay's former partner in person. That request was denied Tuesday morning. Khan spoke to her by telephone Tuesday night.
So why are the AMC and SCO eager to have the names of the four made public? AMC communications officer Sheila North Wilson said in an email that "AMC will not be providing a statement on the publication ban as this matter is currently under litigation."
There is no litigation and it's tough to know why the AMC perceives itself to have a horse in this race.
Some believe the battle to name the former partner and McKay's children is linked to the fight to name social workers and others connected with Phoenix's CFS dealings. The fears the four have expressed of potential threats to personal safety and their reputation echo those of CFS workers who didn't want to be identified. The MGEU went to court to prevent the names of social workers from being made public. They failed.
If one side was forced to testify in full glare, shouldn't the other?
But this isn't a trial and, in theory, there aren't sides. Bill Gange, the foursome's lawyer, argues the former partner should be protected under the Child and Family Services Act because she was an informant under the act. If she isn't protected, he argues, other people will be discouraged from following the act's edict to report suspected child abuse.
She is expected to testify she called Intertribal CFS worker Randy Murdock in March 2006 to report Phoenix Sinclair was being abused. If she hadn't, it's impossible to know when (or if) the child's slaying would have been uncovered.
Her evidence is expected to be incendiary. The phone call to Intertribal is on the record. What hasn't been heard is why she felt threatened by McKay after that call was made.
If this wrangling is an effort to bully the witness into not testifying, it seems doomed to fail. She and her sons found the strength to report the assaults and murder and to testify at the criminal trial. No one can blame them for not wanting to be publicly identified as the kin of Karl McKay. None carries his last name.
Trying to force them into the spotlight, knowing they are the only reason McKay and Kematch faced justice for their hideous crime, is appalling.
lindor.reynolds@freepress.mb.ca
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 27, 2013 A6
Fact Check
Have you found an error, or know of something we’ve missed in one of our stories? Please use the form below and let us know.
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 5 articles for today)
My arm tattoo has me thinking
1:00 AM 0I have a swell new tattoo on my right arm.
Prepare to be extremely jealous, because it artfully depicts a pink ...
About Lindor Reynolds
National Newspaper Award winner Lindor Reynolds began work at the Free Press as a 17-year-old proofreader. It was a rough introduction to the news business.
Many years later, armed with a university education and a portfolio of published work, she was hired as a Free Press columnist. During her 20-plus years on the job she has written for every section in the paper, with the exception of Business. She’ll get around to them some day.
Lindor has received considerable recognition for her writing. Her awards include the Will Rogers Humanitarian Award, the National Society of Newspaper Columnists’ general interest award and the North American Travel Journalists Association top prize.
Her work on Internet luring led to an amendment to the Criminal Code of Canada and her coverage of the child welfare system prompted a change to Manitoba Child and Family Services Act to make the safety of children paramount.
She has earned three citations of merit for the Michener Award for Meritorious Public Service in Journalism and has been awarded a Distinguished Alumni commendation from the University of Winnipeg. Lindor was also named a YMCA/YWCA Woman of Distinction.
She is married with four daughters. If her house was on fire and the kids and dog were safe, she’d grab her passport.
lindor.reynolds@freepress.mb.ca
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Next time, see if she'll let you wear your jersey
- Bogosian too important an asset to let slip away
- My arm tattoo has me thinking
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Christmas treat good any time of year
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Blue offence must make teams pay for blitzing Buck
- Canadian to expose alien collaboration with U.S.
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Fiasco fixers
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- What a knockout!
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- 'Nice' guy taking sex partners for granted
- Discovering your wife's kinky behaviour isn't an invitation to join the party
- Next time, see if she'll let you wear your jersey
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- UFC 161 a smash success
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Ground control to Major Chris
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Bigger Byfuglien in no shape for a trade
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Fiasco fixers
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- Nice new digs, but Buchko has work to do
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Whether sweet or savoury, delicious is spelled 'nalysnyky'
- Bogosian too important an asset to let slip away
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Mau Maus win 50-year-long battle
- Take a walk in the park to fight prostate cancer
- Psychics pull off a little magic
- Fiasco fixers
- Nepinak's leadership gathering steam
- Offensive linemen move faster than buses
- Helping others despite the cost
- Life, love and all that jazz
- Downtown's parking facilities tell story of city's development
- When the Ford jokes stop
- Bible Belt's bogeyman still haunts town
- St. Norbert sees condo boom
- Immobilizer program too cosy, some charge
- At 55, I'm wise to what's real in life
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Lessons learned in 4-H last a lifetime
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Ground control to Major Chris
Ads by Google
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is be a Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscriber to join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
Have Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press print or e-edition subscribers only. why?
Login SubscribeHave Your Say
Comments are open to Winnipeg Free Press Subscribers only. why?
SubscribeThe Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.