Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Choice of guardian paramount in young parents' will
Mark and Susan have young children. When it came time to do their wills, their lawyer asked, "Who should take over in the role of parents if the two of you die while the kids are underage?" For young families, that is often the most difficult decision during the will-making process.
If you have young children, it is important you address that when you are making a will. How do you pick the right person for the job?
First and foremost, you are looking for the person who will be the best substitute parent. You need to appoint someone who will give them a loving home, teach them the right values and give them a strong moral example to follow. Kids do what they see, not what they are told. Do not worry about whether the person you are considering as testamentary guardian has money. That is secondary. Your will can and should hold the children's inheritances in trust and make it available along the way to pay for food, bicycles, books, tuition and the other amounts involved in their upbringing.
After you have picked the best possible substitute parent, everything else is secondary. Family is better than non-family, but that is not a trump factor if the best person is someone outside the family.
Geography is important, but not critical. It is useful if the testamentary guardian lives in the same city. There will be less disruption for the children if they are able to keep the same school and same friends.
Age is important, but not critical. Some people pick their parents for the job, and the parents' health may not be assured if they are on in years. That is still fine, provided another younger person is designated as the alternate to take over if the parent cannot accept the job.
It is best to pick a person, not a couple. Couples break up. If you are considering a couple, ask yourself which one should take the children if the couple has separated.
Ask the person you pick, before you sign the will, whether they are willing.
Pick the guardian first. It is the most important job. Then pick a person to serve as trustee over the money. It is usually best, where possible, to keep the two roles separate. Put one person in charge of parenting and another over purse strings.
Strictly speaking, the appointment you write into your will is not binding. It is highly influential, however. Generally, no one in the family will interfere with your choice of testamentary guardian when the time comes and that guardian steps forward to shoulder the commitment. At the same time, the best interests of the children will always trump the wishes of the parent. The brother you picked and wrote into the will as testamentary guardian might divorce, quit his job as a teacher and take up a transient career as a rodeo clown before you die. The courts will intervene, if need be, to make sure the children are not living out of the back of a pickup truck and chewing tobacco before breakfast.
Mark and Susan ultimately put a clause in their will appointing Mark's sister as testamentary guardian for the children. They are confident she will give the children a loving home. She said yes when they asked her if she was willing. The wills include a provision that gives the sister $100,000 as a cash gift if the worst occurs and she is forced to take the children. The sister would likely use that money to buy a family van and build another pair of bedrooms in her house. The will also directs that all of the children's direct and indirect expenses be paid for out of the trust. The sister will never need to take her wallet out to pay expenses for the children she has agreed to take into her home.
This story is real one. The names involved and some of the details have been changed to preserve the confidentiality of the couple involved.
John E.S. Poyser is a lawyer with Tradition Law LLP. Contact him at 204-947-6802 or jpoyser@traditionlaw.ca, or visit www.traditionlaw.ca.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 20, 2013 B6
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
More Columnists
(1 of 44 articles for this week)
To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
05/24/2013 1:00 AM 0Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Negotiate deal with your wife that works for both of you
- Vigneault will be a man in demand
- To call 'Cliffy' a character doesn't do him justice
- You can bet the farm on housebarns
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Buck 'goes long' for Winnipeg
- Don't wear yourself out trying to win her back
- Blame ad by mayor, deputy for jeopardizing money-saver
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Katz bogeys again
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- Tell husband you're not talking to her... maybe tell him why
- Tell the building manager and the peep show will end
- Vigneault will be a man in demand
- Big Blue will have one helluva punter
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Goodbye, Susan; a privilege to know you
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Beloved piece of Winnipeg's music history deserves better
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- Katz bogeys again
- Dugouts could change the game
- Winter is coming
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Not much fun at this Carnaval
- You can bet the farm on housebarns
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Tick season means pets at risk of Lyme disease
- Burmistrov wants out of Winnipeg
- Not much fun at this Carnaval
- Mount Carmel Clinic: An oasis of acceptance in a judgmental world
- Katz bogeys again
- Harper needs to quit hiding behind his staff
- Granddaddy of the mock doc takes to TV
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Dugouts could change the game
- Happily selling shoes at age 89
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Changes to CPP rules worth looking into
- Selinger's ability to sell case weak link in tax-hike plan
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.