Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Posted: 07/17/2013 1:00 AM | Comments: 0
Mark and Mary have two children, Jon and Nola. Seven years separate the two children. Why? The couple had trouble conceiving the second time around. Mark suffered a medical misadventure that left his sperm count exceedingly low. Adoption was an option. Ultimately, they made arrangements to inseminate Mary with sperm from a donor. Everything worked out beautifully. Nola, the daughter from that process, was a gift. She is a lovely and accomplished young woman and both her parents love her very much.
There was a wrinkle when it came time to make their wills, however. The normal language lawyers use would see everything go to "my spouse" and then, at the second death, equally to "my children" when both of them have passed away. That language works fine for Mary -- she is the biological mother of both Jon and Nola. It does not work for Mark -- he is the biological father of Jon but is not the biological father of Nola. He never adopted her either. That means Nola would be excluded from a share of Mark's estate if he was the second member of the couple to die. Mark loves both the children without distinction and has no intention of disinheriting Nola.
He needed a special phrase in his will to avoid that result. Words have to be inserted to make it clear both Jon and Nola are to be treated as his children for all purposes under the will.
When is a child a child? Legally, a child is a person linked to the parent by blood or by adoption.
Stepchildren do not qualify. Special language is required in the will to change that.
You might think this does not apply to you. Maybe. What about your grandchildren? Wills normally include a clause dealing with what happens if one of your children predeceases you, and gives the share of the deceased child to any grandchildren you have through that deceased child. That result is often buried from plain view in the use of the following legal phrase that you may find in your will: "among the issue of the deceased child in equal shares per stirpes." Lawyers love Latin. If you have step-grandchildren, you should consciously decide whether you want them included or excluded from possible inheritance. Should they stand shoulder to shoulder and share alongside your biological and adoptive grandchildren?
For some grandparents, the answer to that question is "absolutely yes." For others, the answer is "absolutely no." One way or the other, some specific language should be in your will to make your wishes clear on the point. You do not want to leave the family in a position where they have to consult a lawyer after you are gone to clarify the legal definition of "child," "grandchild" or "issue." That will allow a nasty little element of doubt to creep in. Did you really mean to exclude the step grandchild or was it inadvertent?
Mark and Mary are real. Facts and names have been changed extensively to protect their confidentiality.
John E.S. Poyser is a lawyer with Tradition Law LLP. Contact him at 204-947-6802 or firstname.lastname@example.org, or visit www.traditionlaw.ca.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition July 17, 2013 B5
Having problems with the form?Contact Us Directly
That empty (nest) feeling
Long wait over for odd-couple cop show
PC leader keeps far from flood fight's crucial front lines
Fringe flap gets ugly
Dungy would deny Sam the opportunity he was given
Council ripe for third-party rule?
PST court challenge was risky political ruse
'I could have texted all night': Selfie a modern My Fair Lady
Good idea to leave town to escape ex-girlfriend
Wiener dog a wonder at weight loss
Peacock network regains top spot
I say, they've noticed our potential in London
Blowing up bad music an explosive idea
Proposed daily limits, labelling rules to give consumers better handle on sugar intake
Ease daughter's friend out of your bed, home
Keep your hands off hunk you supervise
Call inquiry into city hall's rotten, fetid mess
Fringe festival has revolutionary roots
A century-old love story
Inspecting crops with drones? It will happen
Couple struggles to cope with disability
Your weekend weather
Breeding population just ducky on Prairies
Help mom expand her social life outside of family
Whipping exposes abundant flaws
Going ape over motion capture
The globetrotter's portfolio: Canadian investors should seek returns beyond their own backyard
Ta-ta, traditional TV
Feel free to ignore the Gris
Canadians show more apathy than hostility toward organized religion
Lacklustre Blue didn't help their bottom line
The dog and his noisy duck are quack-ers
Some rare good news from CRA
Whether friend was assaulted or not, she needs help to deal with problem
Flood recovery initiatives need better oversight
O-line a disaster area
Dream bike stolen
Kudrow is Comeback kid