Winnipeg Free Press - PRINT EDITION
Focus on crime, not statistics
Lies, damn lies and statistics.
The old line about how easy it is to manipulate statistics came to mind again this week as yet another critic of Statistics Canada took aim at the agency's data on crime rates.
Statistics Canada has been reporting falling rates of overall crime and violent crime for some time, a stance that is at odds with the federal Conservative government's efforts to toughen criminal laws and build new prisons.
There are exceptions to the overall trend. For example, Manitoba's violent crime rate increased by 10 per cent in 2009, primarily due to a 25 per cent increase in robberies. But Statscan data show national rates of crime reported to police dropping.
Conservatives argue the statistics are wrong and do not reflect all criminal activity. Critics say the Harper government is pandering to fears about personal safety.
The Macdonald-Laurier Institute added to the Conservative argument with a report that says crime is increasing and Statistics Canada's methods are suspect. Among the criticisms: the agency's reporting on crime rates does not account for unreported crime, even as other Statistics Canada data show people are increasingly not reporting crimes such as break-ins.
In my reporting life I covered police, courts -- even the Supreme Court of Canada -- and the work that Statistics Canada does.
What I learned was simple: The first thing you should do in any debate about tackling crime is forget about most crime statistics.
It is easy to criticize crime statistics.
One key problem with studies on police-reported crime is that they measures criminal charges, not convictions.
Thus the main thing that the most widely quoted crime statistics measure is police activity -- what offences they pursue, what charges they lay and even what resources they have.
A prime example of this happened last Christmas in Winnipeg. Take a look at the statistics and they seem to show drunk driving increased dramatically. What really happened is that police targeted locations, such as bars, that are more likely to produce impaired drivers, so they laid more charges.
Police themselves said it is unlikely that the prevalence of drunk driving changed in a single year. In fact, the new enforcement strategy could end up reducing impaired driving in the longer term by acting as a more effective deterrent.
I learned this as a young reporter looking at Winnipeg police statistics one year that appeared to show the logically impossible scenario of increased drug sales and decreased drug use.
Drug trafficking charges had shot up; simple possession charges had dropped. The reason had nothing to do with drug use, but was due to police changing enforcement tactics to focus on bigger drug investigations and catch bigger fish in the illegal drug chain, with the goal of ultimately reducing the drug supply.
Perhaps the only truly reliable crime statistic is the homicide rate. Killing, and how it's defined, has not changed that much over the years. All police forces can identify almost all culpable killings and there is a very high rate of laying charges.
Take a look at the homicide rate and you'll see it has been pretty steady for the past two decades. The 2009 rate was 1.8 victims per 100,000 population in Canada. In 1961 it was 1.3.
Again, Manitoba has bucked the trend here, with the 2009 rate of 4.66 per 100,000 tops among provinces and higher than in the 1990s, a fact often attributed to gang activity.
Those numbers highlight the fact that criminal activities and the ways to reduce them are not simple. In Manitoba it is gang activity, and not the overall homicide rate, that we should be worrying about.
Winnipeg learned this dealing with car thefts.
The city got rid of its unwanted title as Car Theft Capital of Canada with a comprehensive auto theft suppression strategy that involved players from the police, justice and social welfare systems, and even the vehicle insurance corporation.
In all areas of crime, we would do better if we focused on discussion on how to curb illegal activities, rather than whether the statistics are accurate.
Bob Cox is publisher of the Winnipeg Free Press.
Republished from the Winnipeg Free Press print edition February 11, 2011 A13
More Columnists
- Back to Top
- Return to Columnists
About Bob Cox
Bob Cox was named publisher of the Winnipeg Free Press in November 2007. He joined the newspaper as editor in May 2005.
"Rejoined" is a better word for it, because Bob first worked at the newspaper as a reporter in January 1984. He covered crime and courts for three years before getting restless and moving on to other journalism jobs.
Since then, his career has spanned four provinces and five cities. Highlights include working in Ottawa for the Canadian Press covering Prime Minister Jean Chrétien during his first term in office, and five years at the Globe and Mail in Toronto, first as national editor and later as night editor.
Bob grew up on a farm in southwestern Ontario, but has spent most of his adult life in Western Canada in Winnipeg, Regina and Edmonton.
bob.cox@freepress.mb.ca
Poll
Most Popular Columnists
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Big Blue will have one helluva punter
- 'Most hated man' in Senate
- He's been taking funny seriously for 60 years
- Can't lose when ends justify means
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- Feds trim the beef from research
- Tick season means pets at risk of Lyme disease
- Tell your dad what you think
- Katz bogeys again
- Katz bogeys again
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- Tell husband you're not talking to her... maybe tell him why
- Burke will be back; he's just that good
- Mount Carmel Clinic: An oasis of acceptance in a judgmental world
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Cancer doesn't care who it may kill
- When money talks, it says, 'End fighting in the NHL'
- Jolie's mastectomy choice a game-changer
- Goodbye, Susan; a privilege to know you
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Beloved piece of Winnipeg's music history deserves better
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- Katz bogeys again
- Dugouts could change the game
- Winter is coming
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Tick season means pets at risk of Lyme disease
- Political opportunity knocks to abolish Senate
- A new mom's booze-fuelled hell
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Late deal in workplace sex-harassment case
- 3D printers will make outsourcing so yesterday
- Explore Desire seminars to 'push the boundaries'
- Going gluten-free doesn't mean giving up foods you love
- Cancer doesn't care who it may kill
- Mount Carmel Clinic: An oasis of acceptance in a judgmental world
- Katz bogeys again
- Tick season means pets at risk of Lyme disease
- Twins are theirs, but province doesn't agree
- 'It's a beautiful story': There's not always a tomorrow to say you're sorry or make things right
- Bun Brouhaha: Kitchen staff's snap firing worthy of reality TV
- Dugouts could change the game
- Happily selling shoes at age 89
- Facebook pokes Manitoba
- White sucker right for Manitoba
- New Blue stadium lives up to the hype; now it's up to you
- Selinger's ability to sell case weak link in tax-hike plan
- Emotional roller-coaster
Ads by Google












You can comment on most stories on winnipegfreepress.com. You can also agree or disagree with other comments. All you need to do is register and/or login and you can join the conversation and give your feedback.
Have Your Say
New to commenting? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions.
The Winnipeg Free Press does not necessarily endorse any of the views posted. By submitting your comment, you agree to our Terms and Conditions. These terms were revised effective April 16, 2010.